China Intelligence Information Systems, Inc.
China Intelligence Information Systems, Inc. (IICN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IICN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IICN | $0.00 | +0.00% | 143.9K | 0.01 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FOJCY | $3.63 | +0.69% | 81.3B | 12.95 | $0.28 | +11.87% |
| CZAVF | $60.10 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 23.12 | $2.60 | +3.69% |
| OEZVF | $78.47 | +0.00% | 27.3B | 13.32 | $5.89 | +4.05% |
| OEZVY | $15.45 | +0.39% | 26.5B | 12.98 | $1.19 | +4.01% |
| DOGEF | $47.58 | -0.72% | 20B | 116.04 | $0.41 | N/A |
| TKECY | $4.00 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 18.18 | $0.22 | N/A |
| DNNGY | $15.67 | -0.82% | 19.7B | 111.79 | $0.14 | N/A |
| CEZYY | $18.00 | -0.28% | 19.3B | 15.65 | $1.15 | N/A |
| FOJCF | $17.96 | -6.94% | 16.1B | 13.11 | $1.37 | +11.31% |
Stock Comparison
IICN vs FOJCY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, FOJCY has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while FOJCY trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FOJCY's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOJCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to FOJCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check FOJCY's competition here
IICN vs CZAVF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CZAVF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CZAVF trades at $60.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CZAVF's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CZAVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CZAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CZAVF's competition here
IICN vs OEZVF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, OEZVF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while OEZVF trades at $78.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OEZVF's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OEZVF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to OEZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check OEZVF's competition here
IICN vs OEZVY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, OEZVY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while OEZVY trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OEZVY's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OEZVY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to OEZVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check OEZVY's competition here
IICN vs DOGEF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, DOGEF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while DOGEF trades at $47.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DOGEF's P/E ratio is 116.04. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOGEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to DOGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check DOGEF's competition here
IICN vs TKECY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TKECY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TKECY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TKECY's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKECY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TKECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TKECY's competition here
IICN vs DNNGY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, DNNGY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while DNNGY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DNNGY's P/E ratio is 111.79. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNNGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to DNNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check DNNGY's competition here
IICN vs CEZYY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CEZYY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CEZYY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CEZYY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEZYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CEZYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CEZYY's competition here
IICN vs FOJCF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, FOJCF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while FOJCF trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FOJCF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOJCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to FOJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check FOJCF's competition here
IICN vs CLPXF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CLPXF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CLPXF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CLPXF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CLPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CLPXF's competition here
IICN vs KAEPF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, KAEPF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while KAEPF trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KAEPF's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAEPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to KAEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check KAEPF's competition here
IICN vs KAEPY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, KAEPY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while KAEPY trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KAEPY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAEPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to KAEPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check KAEPY's competition here
IICN vs EDRVF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, EDRVF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while EDRVF trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas EDRVF's P/E ratio is -18.59. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EDRVF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to EDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check EDRVF's competition here
IICN vs MDDNF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, MDDNF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while MDDNF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MDDNF's P/E ratio is 114.26. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to MDDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check MDDNF's competition here
IICN vs CLPXY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CLPXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CLPXY trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CLPXY's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CLPXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CLPXY's competition here
IICN vs BRENF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, BRENF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while BRENF trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BRENF's P/E ratio is -34.11. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRENF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to BRENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check BRENF's competition here
IICN vs NOSPF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, NOSPF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while NOSPF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NOSPF's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOSPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to NOSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check NOSPF's competition here
IICN vs COENF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, COENF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while COENF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas COENF's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COENF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to COENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check COENF's competition here
IICN vs TKECF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TKECF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TKECF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TKECF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKECF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TKECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TKECF's competition here
IICN vs MGHTF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, MGHTF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while MGHTF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MGHTF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to MGHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check MGHTF's competition here
IICN vs IFUUF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, IFUUF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while IFUUF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas IFUUF's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFUUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to IFUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check IFUUF's competition here
IICN vs TEPCF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TEPCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TEPCF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TEPCF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEPCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TEPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TEPCF's competition here
IICN vs AGQPF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, AGQPF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while AGQPF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas AGQPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGQPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to AGQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check AGQPF's competition here
IICN vs PUPOF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, PUPOF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while PUPOF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PUPOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUPOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to PUPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check PUPOF's competition here
IICN vs NPIFF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, NPIFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while NPIFF trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NPIFF's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPIFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to NPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check NPIFF's competition here
IICN vs DRXGY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, DRXGY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while DRXGY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DRXGY's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRXGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to DRXGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check DRXGY's competition here
IICN vs DRXGF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, DRXGF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while DRXGF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DRXGF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRXGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to DRXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check DRXGF's competition here
IICN vs TEPCY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TEPCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TEPCY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TEPCY's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEPCY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TEPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TEPCY's competition here
IICN vs EDRWY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, EDRWY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while EDRWY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas EDRWY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EDRWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to EDRWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check EDRWY's competition here
IICN vs CPOIF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CPOIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CPOIF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CPOIF's P/E ratio is 459.09. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPOIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CPOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CPOIF's competition here
IICN vs EPWDF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, EPWDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while EPWDF trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas EPWDF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPWDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to EPWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check EPWDF's competition here
IICN vs TREAY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TREAY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TREAY trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TREAY's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TREAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TREAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TREAY's competition here
IICN vs TRSWF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TRSWF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TRSWF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TRSWF's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRSWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TRSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TRSWF's competition here
IICN vs BRLXF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, BRLXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while BRLXF trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BRLXF's P/E ratio is 295.38. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRLXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to BRLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check BRLXF's competition here
IICN vs CGKEF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CGKEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CGKEF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CGKEF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CGKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CGKEF's competition here
IICN vs INGXF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, INGXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while INGXF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas INGXF's P/E ratio is 72.18. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INGXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to INGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check INGXF's competition here
IICN vs ALRCF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ALRCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ALRCF trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ALRCF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALRCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ALRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ALRCF's competition here
IICN vs CGKEY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CGKEY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CGKEY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CGKEY's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGKEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CGKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CGKEY's competition here
IICN vs TREAF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TREAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TREAF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TREAF's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TREAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TREAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TREAF's competition here
IICN vs STECF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, STECF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while STECF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas STECF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STECF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to STECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check STECF's competition here
IICN vs FSGCY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, FSGCY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while FSGCY trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FSGCY's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSGCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to FSGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check FSGCY's competition here
IICN vs ENGDF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ENGDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ENGDF trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ENGDF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENGDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ENGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ENGDF's competition here
IICN vs SEYMF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, SEYMF has a market cap of 984.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while SEYMF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SEYMF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEYMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to SEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check SEYMF's competition here
IICN vs VLTAF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, VLTAF has a market cap of 924.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while VLTAF trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VLTAF's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLTAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to VLTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check VLTAF's competition here
IICN vs ERXCF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ERXCF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ERXCF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ERXCF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ERXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ERXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ERXCF's competition here
IICN vs CWPWF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CWPWF has a market cap of 397.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CWPWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CWPWF's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWPWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CWPWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CWPWF's competition here
IICN vs LGSXY Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, LGSXY has a market cap of 383.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while LGSXY trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas LGSXY's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGSXY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to LGSXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check LGSXY's competition here
IICN vs PVLTF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, PVLTF has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while PVLTF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PVLTF's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVLTF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is less volatile compared to PVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check PVLTF's competition here
IICN vs OKEPF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, OKEPF has a market cap of 361.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while OKEPF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OKEPF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OKEPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to OKEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check OKEPF's competition here
IICN vs ENLTF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ENLTF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ENLTF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ENLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is less volatile compared to ENLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ENLTF's competition here
IICN vs ATRWF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ATRWF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ATRWF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ATRWF's P/E ratio is -425.00. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATRWF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ATRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ATRWF's competition here
IICN vs SMTLD Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, SMTLD has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while SMTLD trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SMTLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMTLD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to SMTLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check SMTLD's competition here
IICN vs RAMPF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, RAMPF has a market cap of 186M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while RAMPF trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas RAMPF's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAMPF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to RAMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check RAMPF's competition here
IICN vs SVMRF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, SVMRF has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while SVMRF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SVMRF's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVMRF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to SVMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check SVMRF's competition here
IICN vs IESVF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, IESVF has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while IESVF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas IESVF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IESVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to IESVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check IESVF's competition here
IICN vs PHNGF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, PHNGF has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while PHNGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PHNGF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHNGF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to PHNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check PHNGF's competition here
IICN vs TDWRF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TDWRF has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TDWRF trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TDWRF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDWRF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TDWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TDWRF's competition here
IICN vs SMTLF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, SMTLF has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while SMTLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SMTLF's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMTLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to SMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check SMTLF's competition here
IICN vs SKPGF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, SKPGF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while SKPGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SKPGF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to SKPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check SKPGF's competition here
IICN vs AZREF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, AZREF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while AZREF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas AZREF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AZREF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to AZREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check AZREF's competition here
IICN vs WEGYF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, WEGYF has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while WEGYF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WEGYF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEGYF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to WEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check WEGYF's competition here
IICN vs GIPIF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, GIPIF has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while GIPIF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GIPIF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GIPIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to GIPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check GIPIF's competition here
IICN vs SMAYF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, SMAYF has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while SMAYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SMAYF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMAYF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to SMAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check SMAYF's competition here
IICN vs WNDW Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, WNDW has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while WNDW trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WNDW's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WNDW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to WNDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check WNDW's competition here
IICN vs CLMOF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CLMOF has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CLMOF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CLMOF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLMOF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is less volatile compared to CLMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CLMOF's competition here
IICN vs SHUNF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, SHUNF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while SHUNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SHUNF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHUNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to SHUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check SHUNF's competition here
IICN vs CLNV Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CLNV has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CLNV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CLNV's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLNV's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CLNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CLNV's competition here
IICN vs CWGYF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CWGYF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CWGYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CWGYF's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWGYF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CWGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CWGYF's competition here
IICN vs PHIXF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, PHIXF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while PHIXF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PHIXF's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to PHIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check PHIXF's competition here
IICN vs RROYF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, RROYF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while RROYF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas RROYF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RROYF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to RROYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check RROYF's competition here
IICN vs AZLOF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, AZLOF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while AZLOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas AZLOF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AZLOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to AZLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check AZLOF's competition here
IICN vs AWSL Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, AWSL has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while AWSL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas AWSL's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AWSL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to AWSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check AWSL's competition here
IICN vs GEBRF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, GEBRF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while GEBRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GEBRF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEBRF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to GEBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check GEBRF's competition here
IICN vs MOTNF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, MOTNF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while MOTNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MOTNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOTNF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is less volatile compared to MOTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check MOTNF's competition here
IICN vs FNEC Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, FNEC has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while FNEC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FNEC's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNEC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to FNEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check FNEC's competition here
IICN vs ASRE Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ASRE has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ASRE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ASRE's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASRE's ROE of -7.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ASRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ASRE's competition here
IICN vs NKWFF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, NKWFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while NKWFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NKWFF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NKWFF's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to NKWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check NKWFF's competition here
IICN vs VGREF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, VGREF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while VGREF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VGREF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VGREF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to VGREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check VGREF's competition here
IICN vs PRHL Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, PRHL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while PRHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PRHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to PRHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check PRHL's competition here
IICN vs TNSTF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TNSTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TNSTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TNSTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNSTF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TNSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TNSTF's competition here
IICN vs VXIT Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, VXIT has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while VXIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VXIT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VXIT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to VXIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check VXIT's competition here
IICN vs PWCO Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, PWCO has a market cap of 841.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while PWCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PWCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PWCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to PWCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check PWCO's competition here
IICN vs ALKHF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ALKHF has a market cap of 802.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ALKHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ALKHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALKHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ALKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ALKHF's competition here
IICN vs NEVE Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, NEVE has a market cap of 746.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while NEVE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NEVE's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to NEVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check NEVE's competition here
IICN vs GSFI Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, GSFI has a market cap of 654.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while GSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GSFI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSFI's ROE of +7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to GSFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check GSFI's competition here
IICN vs ENCVF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ENCVF has a market cap of 630.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ENCVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ENCVF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENCVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is less volatile compared to ENCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ENCVF's competition here
IICN vs MMMW Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, MMMW has a market cap of 470.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while MMMW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MMMW's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMMW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to MMMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check MMMW's competition here
IICN vs VSPC Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, VSPC has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while VSPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VSPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VSPC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is less volatile compared to VSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check VSPC's competition here
IICN vs GEECF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, GEECF has a market cap of 94.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while GEECF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GEECF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEECF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is less volatile compared to GEECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check GEECF's competition here
IICN vs ETRXF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ETRXF has a market cap of 66.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ETRXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ETRXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ETRXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ETRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ETRXF's competition here
IICN vs PSPW Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, PSPW has a market cap of 54.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while PSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to PSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check PSPW's competition here
IICN vs TPII Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, TPII has a market cap of 37.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while TPII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TPII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPII's ROE of -22.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to TPII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check TPII's competition here
IICN vs CPWR Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CPWR has a market cap of 36.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CPWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CPWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CPWR's competition here
IICN vs ARSC Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ARSC has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ARSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ARSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARSC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ARSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ARSC's competition here
IICN vs QSPW Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, QSPW has a market cap of 15.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while QSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas QSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QSPW's ROE of -96.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is less volatile compared to QSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check QSPW's competition here
IICN vs ZHYLF Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, ZHYLF has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while ZHYLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ZHYLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZHYLF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to ZHYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check ZHYLF's competition here
IICN vs VENG Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, VENG has a market cap of 12.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while VENG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VENG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VENG's ROE of -8.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to VENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check VENG's competition here
IICN vs VCII Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, VCII has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while VCII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VCII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VCII's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to VCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check VCII's competition here
IICN vs CGEI Comparison August 2025
IICN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IICN stands at 143.9K. In comparison, CGEI has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IICN is priced at $0.00, while CGEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IICN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CGEI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IICN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IICN is more volatile compared to CGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IICN.Check CGEI's competition here