iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IH2O.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IH2O.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IH2O.L | £5,550.50 | +0.92% | 175.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.13% |
| INRG.L | £586.25 | -0.42% | 160.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.26% |
| PRIW.L | £3,008.63 | +1.36% | 116.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JMRE.L | £2,703.00 | -0.11% | 115.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BCHS.L | £10,809.00 | +1.12% | 59.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XGSD.L | £2,648.00 | -0.56% | 58.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.85% |
| LGGG.L | £1,717.40 | +0.33% | 54.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ROBG.L | £1,913.75 | +0.49% | 52.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XSGI.L | £5,304.50 | -0.09% | 27.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GGRG.L | £3,227.00 | -0.09% | 24.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IH2O.L vs INRG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, INRG.L has a market cap of 160.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while INRG.L trades at £586.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INRG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to INRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check INRG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs PRIW.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, PRIW.L has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while PRIW.L trades at £3,008.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIW.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to PRIW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check PRIW.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs JMRE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, JMRE.L has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while JMRE.L trades at £2,703.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to JMRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check JMRE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs BCHS.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, BCHS.L has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while BCHS.L trades at £10,809.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to BCHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check BCHS.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs XGSD.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, XGSD.L has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while XGSD.L trades at £2,648.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to XGSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check XGSD.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs LGGG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, LGGG.L has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while LGGG.L trades at £1,717.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to LGGG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check LGGG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs ROBG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, ROBG.L has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while ROBG.L trades at £1,913.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to ROBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check ROBG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs XSGI.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, XSGI.L has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while XSGI.L trades at £5,304.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSGI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to XSGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check XSGI.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GGRG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GGRG.L has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GGRG.L trades at £3,227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to GGRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GGRG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs PRIG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, PRIG.L has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while PRIG.L trades at £1,458.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to PRIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check PRIG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs JREG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, JREG.L has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while JREG.L trades at £55.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.L's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to JREG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check JREG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs CECL.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, CECL.L has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while CECL.L trades at £1,648.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CECL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to CECL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check CECL.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs JGRE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, JGRE.L has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while JGRE.L trades at £4,205.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to JGRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check JGRE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs SBUY.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, SBUY.L has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while SBUY.L trades at £4,696.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBUY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBUY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to SBUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check SBUY.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs FCSG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, FCSG.L has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while FCSG.L trades at £3,222.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to FCSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check FCSG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GLAB.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GLAB.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GLAB.L trades at £28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GLAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GLAB.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GGOV.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GGOV.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GGOV.L trades at £3,926.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGOV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGOV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GGOV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GGOV.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs RBE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, RBE.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while RBE.L trades at £63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to RBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check RBE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GAGU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GAGU.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GAGU.L trades at £55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAGU.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GAGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GAGU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs DH2O.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, DH2O.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while DH2O.L trades at £73.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DH2O.L's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DH2O.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to DH2O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check DH2O.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GGRA.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GGRA.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GGRA.L trades at £42.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRA.L's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to GGRA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GGRA.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs HVPE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, HVPE.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while HVPE.L trades at £2,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVPE.L's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HVPE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to HVPE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check HVPE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs IDIN.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, IDIN.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while IDIN.L trades at £34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDIN.L's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDIN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to IDIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check IDIN.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs IGSU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, IGSU.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while IGSU.L trades at £82.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSU.L's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to IGSU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check IGSU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs JREM.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, JREM.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while JREM.L trades at £35.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREM.L's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to JREM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check JREM.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs MAGI.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, MAGI.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while MAGI.L trades at £35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAGI.L's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAGI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to MAGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check MAGI.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs PRWU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, PRWU.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while PRWU.L trades at £33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRWU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRWU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to PRWU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check PRWU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs IQSA.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, IQSA.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while IQSA.L trades at £86.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSA.L's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to IQSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check IQSA.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GLDV.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GLDV.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GLDV.L trades at £35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GLDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GLDV.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs JPCT.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, JPCT.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while JPCT.L trades at £45.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPCT.L's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPCT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to JPCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check JPCT.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs V3AL.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, V3AL.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while V3AL.L trades at £6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AL.L's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to V3AL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check V3AL.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs V3AA.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, V3AA.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while V3AA.L trades at £7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AA.L's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to V3AA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check V3AA.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs V3AB.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, V3AB.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while V3AB.L trades at £5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to V3AB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check V3AB.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GGRP.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GGRP.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GGRP.L trades at £2,735.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GGRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GGRP.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs AGT.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, AGT.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while AGT.L trades at £259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGT.L's P/E ratio is 259.00. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGT.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to AGT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check AGT.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs BBGI.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, BBGI.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while BBGI.L trades at £141.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBGI.L's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBGI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to BBGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check BBGI.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GBDV.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GBDV.L has a market cap of 964.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GBDV.L trades at £26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBDV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBDV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GBDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GBDV.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs BCHN.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, BCHN.L has a market cap of 790.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while BCHN.L trades at £143.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHN.L's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCHN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to BCHN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check BCHN.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs APAX.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, APAX.L has a market cap of 785.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while APAX.L trades at £162.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APAX.L's P/E ratio is 162.80. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to APAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check APAX.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GSCT.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GSCT.L has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GSCT.L trades at £166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSCT.L's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSCT.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GSCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GSCT.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs LGGL.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, LGGL.L has a market cap of 717.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while LGGL.L trades at £22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGL.L's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGGL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to LGGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check LGGL.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs ROBO.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, ROBO.L has a market cap of 694.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while ROBO.L trades at £25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBO.L's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROBO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to ROBO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check ROBO.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs XGDD.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, XGDD.L has a market cap of 674.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while XGDD.L trades at £34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGDD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGDD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to XGDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check XGDD.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GDIG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GDIG.L has a market cap of 648.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GDIG.L trades at £36.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDIG.L's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to GDIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GDIG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs PAVE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, PAVE.L has a market cap of 562.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while PAVE.L trades at £42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVE.L's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to PAVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check PAVE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs QYLU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, QYLU.L has a market cap of 547.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while QYLU.L trades at £21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLU.L's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to QYLU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check QYLU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs QYLD.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, QYLD.L has a market cap of 542.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while QYLD.L trades at £15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLD.L's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to QYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check QYLD.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs EPRA.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, EPRA.L has a market cap of 533.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while EPRA.L trades at £5,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPRA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to EPRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check EPRA.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs LUXU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, LUXU.L has a market cap of 481.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while LUXU.L trades at £229.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to LUXU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check LUXU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs SKYU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, SKYU.L has a market cap of 439.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while SKYU.L trades at £52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYU.L's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to SKYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check SKYU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs SDIU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, SDIU.L has a market cap of 433.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while SDIU.L trades at £13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIU.L's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to SDIU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check SDIU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs PAVG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, PAVG.L has a market cap of 427.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while PAVG.L trades at £31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to PAVG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check PAVG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs QYLP.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, QYLP.L has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while QYLP.L trades at £11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to QYLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check QYLP.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs PCGH.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, PCGH.L has a market cap of 403.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while PCGH.L trades at £333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGH.L's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCGH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to PCGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check PCGH.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs SDIP.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, SDIP.L has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while SDIP.L trades at £7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to SDIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check SDIP.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs PCFT.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, PCFT.L has a market cap of 368.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while PCFT.L trades at £216.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCFT.L's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCFT.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to PCFT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check PCFT.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs INFR.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, INFR.L has a market cap of 350.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while INFR.L trades at £2,616.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to INFR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check INFR.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GLRE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GLRE.L has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GLRE.L trades at £33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRE.L's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GLRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GLRE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs TRET.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, TRET.L has a market cap of 311.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while TRET.L trades at £42.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to TRET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check TRET.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GLRA.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GLRA.L has a market cap of 298.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GLRA.L trades at £19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRA.L's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GLRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GLRA.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs URNU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, URNU.L has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while URNU.L trades at £23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URNU.L's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URNU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to URNU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check URNU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GSEO.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GSEO.L has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GSEO.L trades at £63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSEO.L's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSEO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to GSEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GSEO.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GBRE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GBRE.L has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GBRE.L trades at £25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GBRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GBRE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs EGL.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, EGL.L has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while EGL.L trades at £219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGL.L's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGL.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to EGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check EGL.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs URND.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, URND.L has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while URND.L trades at £17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URND.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to URND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check URND.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs JPLG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, JPLG.L has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while JPLG.L trades at £3,223.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPLG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPLG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to JPLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check JPLG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs MNP.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, MNP.L has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while MNP.L trades at £315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNP.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to MNP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check MNP.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs COPX.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, COPX.L has a market cap of 183.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while COPX.L trades at £32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPX.L's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to COPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check COPX.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GENE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GENE.L has a market cap of 181.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GENE.L trades at £1,701.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GENE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GENE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GENE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs JARU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, JARU.L has a market cap of 181.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while JARU.L trades at £1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JARU.L's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JARU.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to JARU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check JARU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs FLXX.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, FLXX.L has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while FLXX.L trades at £28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to FLXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check FLXX.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs FGLR.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, FGLR.L has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while FGLR.L trades at £10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGLR.L's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGLR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to FGLR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check FGLR.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GOGB.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GOGB.L has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GOGB.L trades at £25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GOGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GOGB.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs FGLS.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, FGLS.L has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while FGLS.L trades at £7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGLS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGLS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to FGLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check FGLS.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs CESG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, CESG.L has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while CESG.L trades at £42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESG.L's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to CESG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check CESG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs 0P00018XAR.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, 0P00018XAR.L has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while 0P00018XAR.L trades at £239.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00018XAR.L's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00018XAR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to 0P00018XAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check 0P00018XAR.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs 0P00018XAO.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, 0P00018XAO.L has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while 0P00018XAO.L trades at £208.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00018XAO.L's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00018XAO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to 0P00018XAO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check 0P00018XAO.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs BUG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, BUG.L has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while BUG.L trades at £15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUG.L's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to BUG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check BUG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GEND.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GEND.L has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GEND.L trades at £13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GEND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GEND.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GCED.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GCED.L has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GCED.L trades at £17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCED.L's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCED.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GCED.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GCED.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs PMGR.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, PMGR.L has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while PMGR.L trades at £119.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMGR.L's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to PMGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check PMGR.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GEDV.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GEDV.L has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GEDV.L trades at £20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEDV.L's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to GEDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GEDV.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs FLXG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, FLXG.L has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while FLXG.L trades at £29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to FLXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check FLXG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs FRGE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, FRGE.L has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while FRGE.L trades at £39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRGE.L's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRGE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to FRGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check FRGE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs SKYP.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, SKYP.L has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while SKYP.L trades at £915.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKYP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to SKYP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check SKYP.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs KZG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, KZG.L has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while KZG.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KZG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KZG.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to KZG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check KZG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs AMAL.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, AMAL.L has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while AMAL.L trades at £10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAL.L's P/E ratio is 35.02. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMAL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to AMAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check AMAL.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs METR.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, METR.L has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while METR.L trades at £10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METR.L's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to METR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to METR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check METR.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs HERU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, HERU.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while HERU.L trades at £14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERU.L's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to HERU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check HERU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs 0P000185T5.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, 0P000185T5.L has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while 0P000185T5.L trades at £203.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check 0P000185T5.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs 0P000185T6.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, 0P000185T6.L has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while 0P000185T6.L trades at £172.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check 0P000185T6.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs HBKU.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, HBKU.L has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while HBKU.L trades at £11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBKU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBKU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to HBKU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check HBKU.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GNOM.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GNOM.L has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GNOM.L trades at £6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to GNOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GNOM.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs HERG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, HERG.L has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while HERG.L trades at £11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to HERG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check HERG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs GNOG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, GNOG.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while GNOG.L trades at £4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to GNOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check GNOG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs DRVE.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, DRVE.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while DRVE.L trades at £12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRVE.L's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to DRVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check DRVE.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs FINX.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, FINX.L has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while FINX.L trades at £10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINX.L's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is less volatile compared to FINX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check FINX.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs DRVG.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, DRVG.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while DRVG.L trades at £8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to DRVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check DRVG.L's competition here
IH2O.L vs 0P000185T3.L Comparison August 2025
IH2O.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IH2O.L stands at 175.5B. In comparison, 0P000185T3.L has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IH2O.L is priced at £5,550.50, while 0P000185T3.L trades at £289.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IH2O.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IH2O.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T3.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IH2O.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IH2O.L.Check 0P000185T3.L's competition here