Impact Fusion International, Inc.
Impact Fusion International, Inc. IFUS Peers
See (IFUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFUS | $0.05 | +15.61% | 29.7M | -4.41 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PGPEF | $109.25 | +0.00% | 27.4B | 14.28 | $7.65 | N/A |
| PUBGY | $27.30 | -1.43% | 27.4B | 14.44 | $1.89 | +0.21% |
| WPPGF | $7.43 | -0.93% | 8B | 11.26 | $0.66 | +6.78% |
| DNTUY | $22.00 | -1.96% | 5.8B | -4.40 | -$5.01 | +2.93% |
| DNTUF | $21.85 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -4.36 | -$5.01 | +2.11% |
| CYGIY | $4.81 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 32.07 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $8.08 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 27.86 | $0.29 | +1.39% |
| JCDXY | $8.87 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 12.49 | $0.71 | +3.51% |
| SOTDF | $60.63 | +0.00% | 3.4B | 20.98 | $2.89 | +4.45% |
Stock Comparison
IFUS vs PGPEF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while PGPEF trades at $109.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs PUBGY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while PUBGY trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs WPPGF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while WPPGF trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs DNTUY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while DNTUY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs DNTUF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while DNTUF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CYGIY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CYGIY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CYAGF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs JCDXY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while JCDXY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to JCDXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs SOTDF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while SOTDF trades at $60.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs JCDXF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while JCDXF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs HKUOF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while HKUOF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs HKUOY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while HKUOY trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs FRRFF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while FRRFF trades at $65.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs AIAPF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs NXFNF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 504.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while NXFNF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs SPIDY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to SPIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs YUGVF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 411M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while YUGVF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 351.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs MCCLF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to MCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs TTTPF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs PROM Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while PROM trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to PROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs PTMEY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while PTMEY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs SCPPF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while SCPPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs KLTI Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to KLTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs VCCLF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs PCOFF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs GTNLF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to GTNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs OPESF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while OPESF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CAUUF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CAUUF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to CAUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs GMGZ Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while GMGZ trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs EZOO Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.71. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs NHLPF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while NHLPF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs ACHN Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CNFN Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CNFN trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs SNIPF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while SNIPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs SPTY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while SPTY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs INEOF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while INEOF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs TGNT Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while TGNT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs AATV Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while AATV trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs UCPA Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs VYBE Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to VYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs MMDDF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to MMDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs BYOC Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs DBMM Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs FBOP Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs MMND Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CEENF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to CEENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs LIGA Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 895.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while LIGA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs PVSP Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 755.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CMGO Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 614.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to CMGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs DMSL Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs GOOLF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 293.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs ATXMF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 277K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CYPXF Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 174K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CYPXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs WWIO Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 139K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs ACTL Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs NXMR Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to NXMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs TRBO Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to TRBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs ITKH Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs PRKI Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to PRKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs NBDR Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to NBDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs EPGC Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CMGR Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 16.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to CMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs SNPW Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 15.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while SNPW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs RFII Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs GBXI Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to GBXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs NWCN Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs PSYC Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs CYGT Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to CYGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs GTRL Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while GTRL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs ISML Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs BXNG Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to BXNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs BWAV Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 585. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs ADST Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs WGEE Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 97. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs LOGX Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to LOGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs VPSN Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs ADTY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to ADTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs ZULU Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs LTMP Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.
IFUS vs MYRY Comparison
IFUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFUS stands at 29.7M. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFUS is priced at $0.05, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IFUS's ROE is +2.39%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFUS is more volatile compared to MYRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFUS.