IA Clarington Floating Rate Income Fund
IA Clarington Floating Rate Income Fund IFRF.TO Peers
See (IFRF.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRF.TO | CA$7.96 | -0.13% | 197.6M | N/A | N/A | +7.54% |
| BNC.TO | CA$29.20 | +0.41% | 8.8B | 14.38 | CA$2.03 | +9.46% |
| EIT-UN.TO | CA$15.57 | +0.71% | 2.8B | 6.77 | CA$2.30 | +8.83% |
| NUBF.TO | CA$21.45 | +0.66% | 2.5B | 14.78 | CA$1.45 | +4.41% |
| NREA.TO | CA$23.90 | -1.69% | 1.3B | 20.90 | CA$1.14 | +1.90% |
| PFIA.TO | CA$10.11 | +0.10% | 1.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.50% |
| AD-UN.TO | CA$19.13 | -0.57% | 870.2M | 4.75 | CA$4.03 | +7.10% |
| FIE.TO | CA$8.74 | +0.46% | 828.6M | 13.91 | CA$0.63 | +5.65% |
| MKB.TO | CA$19.27 | +0.31% | 817.3M | N/A | N/A | +3.98% |
| HDIF.TO | CA$8.45 | -0.35% | 411.9M | 19.99 | CA$0.42 | +11.16% |
Stock Comparison
IFRF.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while BNC.TO trades at CA$29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while EIT-UN.TO trades at CA$15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs NUBF.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while NUBF.TO trades at CA$21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while NREA.TO trades at CA$23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while PFIA.TO trades at CA$10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and PFIA.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs AD-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, AD-UN.TO has a market cap of 870.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while AD-UN.TO trades at CA$19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AD-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AD-UN.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to AD-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs FIE.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 828.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while FIE.TO trades at CA$8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs MKB.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 817.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while MKB.TO trades at CA$19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs HDIF.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 411.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while HDIF.TO trades at CA$8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs XTR.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 352.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while XTR.TO trades at CA$11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs CIC.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while CIC.TO trades at CA$12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs VCIP.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while VCIP.TO trades at CA$26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs CCOR.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while CCOR.TO trades at CA$17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and CCOR.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs ZMI.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while ZMI.TO trades at CA$17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs PBY-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while PBY-UN.TO trades at CA$15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs HUBL.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 118.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while HUBL.TO trades at CA$13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to HUBL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs MGB.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 117.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while MGB.TO trades at CA$16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to MGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs FAP.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 107.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while FAP.TO trades at CA$2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs PIC-A.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while PIC-A.TO trades at CA$6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs PLDI.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while PLDI.TO trades at CA$18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and PLDI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs BGI-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while BGI-UN.TO trades at CA$6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs BMAX.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while BMAX.TO trades at CA$14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs TLF.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while TLF.TO trades at CA$25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 38.15. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to TLF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs HTAE.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while HTAE.TO trades at CA$16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs XINC.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while XINC.TO trades at CA$20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to XINC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs FFI-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while FFI-UN.TO trades at CA$12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs MID-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while MID-UN.TO trades at CA$7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to MID-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs RBN-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while RBN-UN.TO trades at CA$8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and RBN-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs XSC.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while XSC.TO trades at CA$17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and XSC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs HGR.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while HGR.TO trades at CA$5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs HHLE.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while HHLE.TO trades at CA$8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs XSI.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, XSI.TO has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while XSI.TO trades at CA$17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and XSI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs SKG-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while SKG-UN.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs FCGI.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while FCGI.TO trades at CA$14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and FCGI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs RIFI.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while RIFI.TO trades at CA$17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and RIFI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs INC-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while INC-UN.TO trades at CA$8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to INC-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs EARN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while EARN.TO trades at CA$49.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and EARN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs PIN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while PIN.TO trades at CA$18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and PIN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs PHR.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while PHR.TO trades at CA$19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and PHR.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs ZWQT.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while ZWQT.TO trades at CA$16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs ETP.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, ETP.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while ETP.TO trades at CA$17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETP.TO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and ETP.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs FGX.NE Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while FGX.NE trades at CA$4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and FGX.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs BSO-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while BSO-UN.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs CIQ-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and CIQ-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs TPAY.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, TPAY.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while TPAY.TO trades at CA$21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPAY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPAY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to TPAY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs FCMI.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while FCMI.TO trades at CA$13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and FCMI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs ENI-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, ENI-UN.TO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while ENI-UN.TO trades at CA$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to ENI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs CES.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, CES.TO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while CES.TO trades at CA$24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CES.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CES.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to CES.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs HID.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while HID.TO trades at CA$21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs HBFE.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while HBFE.TO trades at CA$10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs REIT.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while REIT.TO trades at CA$21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and REIT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs BLB-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, BLB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while BLB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to BLB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs PGI-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, PGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while PGI-UN.TO trades at CA$7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to PGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs IGLB.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, IGLB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while IGLB.TO trades at CA$10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and IGLB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs PMB-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, PMB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while PMB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and PMB-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs GDG-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, GDG-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while GDG-UN.TO trades at CA$13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and GDG-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRF.TO vs HBL-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, HBL-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while HBL-UN.TO trades at CA$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBL-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBL-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO is less volatile compared to HBL-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRF.TO.
IFRF.TO vs BUA-UN.TO Comparison
IFRF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRF.TO stands at 197.6M. In comparison, BUA-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRF.TO is priced at CA$7.96, while BUA-UN.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUA-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUA-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRF.TO and BUA-UN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).