iShares V PLC - iShares France Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
iShares V PLC - iShares France Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) IFRD.AS Peers
See (IFRD.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRD.AS | €5.04 | +0.12% | 1.1M | N/A | N/A | +2.68% |
| JPSR.AS | €23.20 | +0.02% | 788.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.05% |
| IWDA.AS | €100.15 | +0.00% | 92B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €99.75 | -0.03% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.12% |
| VWRL.AS | €127.45 | -0.02% | 32.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.61% |
| SP5H.PA | €305.95 | +0.00% | 19B | 27.15 | €11.27 | +1.22% |
| SP5C.PA | €378.41 | +0.00% | 18.6B | 26.05 | €14.51 | N/A |
| IUSA.AS | €52.44 | +0.00% | 15.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| ISFA.AS | €9.97 | +0.05% | 14.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.55% |
| AMUN.PA | €68.70 | +0.00% | 13.8B | 10.68 | €6.37 | +5.37% |
Stock Comparison
IFRD.AS vs JPSR.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, JPSR.AS has a market cap of 788.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while JPSR.AS trades at €23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSR.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to JPSR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs IWDA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while IWDA.AS trades at €100.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs VUSA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while VUSA.AS trades at €99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs VWRL.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while VWRL.AS trades at €127.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs SP5H.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while SP5H.PA trades at €305.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs SP5C.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while SP5C.PA trades at €378.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs IUSA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while IUSA.AS trades at €52.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ISFA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ISFA.AS trades at €9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs AMUN.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while AMUN.PA trades at €68.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs HAL.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while HAL.AS trades at €121.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs PSH.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CSH2.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CSH2.PA trades at €106.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs WLDH.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while WLDH.PA trades at €219.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs WLD.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while WLD.PA trades at €341.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs SOF.BR Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while SOF.BR trades at €280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs MEUD.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while MEUD.PA trades at €258.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs IMEU.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while IMEU.AS trades at €33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs GBLB.BR Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while GBLB.BR trades at €72.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 302.71. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs I500.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while I500.AS trades at €10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs I50D.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while I50D.AS trades at €6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs LCWD.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs GOLD.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while GOLD.PA trades at €111.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs IWRD.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while IWRD.AS trades at €72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CC4.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CC4.PA trades at €224.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ECRP.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs VHYL.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while VHYL.AS trades at €63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs 500.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while 500.PA trades at €104.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs AEME.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while AEME.PA trades at €69.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CW8.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CW8.PA trades at €546.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs IJPA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while IJPA.AS trades at €52.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs PHAU.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while PHAU.AS trades at €260.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs REINA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while REINA.AS trades at €27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs UST.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while UST.PA trades at €78.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs S500H.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while S500H.PA trades at €86.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs S500.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while S500.PA trades at €149.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs KBCA.BR Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while KBCA.BR trades at €58.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs VEUR.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while VEUR.AS trades at €41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs USA.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while USA.PA trades at €492.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs 500X.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while 500X.AS trades at €37.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EUEA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EUEA.AS trades at €54.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs IEMM.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while IEMM.AS trades at €40.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs USAC.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while USAC.PA trades at €533.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs RF.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while RF.PA trades at €60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs C50U.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while C50U.PA trades at €162.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ICHN.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ICHD.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ICHD.AS trades at €4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ALLFG.AS trades at €6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -23.86. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs WSRI.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CACC.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CACC.PA trades at €37.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CAC.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CAC.PA trades at €77.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs AUEM.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while AUEM.PA trades at €6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs MF.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while MF.PA trades at €89.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -30.78. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs MSE.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while MSE.PA trades at €58.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CD5.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CD5.PA trades at €85.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs C50.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while C50.PA trades at €138.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs BREB.BR Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while BREB.BR trades at €118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ROLA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ROLA.AS trades at €63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS and ROLA.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRD.AS vs AEEM.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while AEEM.PA trades at €5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs WESE.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while WESE.PA trades at €71.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs TKO.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while TKO.PA trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs VERX.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while VERX.AS trades at €42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CB3.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CB3.PA trades at €220.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs SEMD.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while SEMD.AS trades at €5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS and SEMD.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFRD.AS vs EEUE.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EEUE.PA trades at €16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EHYA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ESE.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ESE.PA trades at €26.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs GEMU.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EUSRI.PA trades at €84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs TNOW.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while TNOW.PA trades at €835.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EPAB.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EPAB.PA trades at €35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EXCH.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EXCH.AS trades at €5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ANX.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ANX.PA trades at €219.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs TDIV.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while TDIV.AS trades at €42.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs USRI.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ANTIN.PA trades at €11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs PABW.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while PABW.PA trades at €76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ACWI.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ACWI.PA trades at €473.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CMUD.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CMUD.PA trades at €66.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs PEUG.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while PEUG.PA trades at €73.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs BNKE.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while BNKE.PA trades at €242.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EGOV.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EGOV.PA trades at €49.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs MUSD.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while MUSD.AS trades at €8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs PHAG.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while PHAG.AS trades at €28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs WAT.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while WAT.PA trades at €67.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs GIMB.BR Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while GIMB.BR trades at €41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EMPA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EMPA.AS trades at €6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs MPAB.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while MPAB.AS trades at €5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs AASI.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while AASI.PA trades at €39.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EGRI.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EGRI.PA trades at €45.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs LWCR.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while LWCR.PA trades at €498.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs BNK.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while BNK.PA trades at €45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs INR.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while INR.PA trades at €28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs CG1.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while CG1.PA trades at €424.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs TFG.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while TFG.AS trades at €16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs EXA1.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while EXA1.AS trades at €12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs WQDA.AS Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while WQDA.AS trades at €9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs DAX.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while DAX.PA trades at €218.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ESGH.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ESGH.PA trades at €25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.
IFRD.AS vs ESGE.PA Comparison
IFRD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRD.AS stands at 1.1M. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRD.AS is priced at €5.04, while ESGE.PA trades at €34.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, IFRD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRD.AS is less volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRD.AS.