VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (Hedged) ETF
VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (Hedged) ETF IFRA.AX Peers
See (IFRA.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA.AX | A$22.58 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 20.36 | A$1.10 | +3.12% |
| IOO.AX | A$164.21 | +0.00% | 6.7B | 24.91 | A$6.49 | +1.14% |
| IXJ.AX | A$131.07 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 23.80 | A$5.45 | +1.65% |
| ETHI.AX | A$15.90 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 21.26 | A$0.73 | +2.45% |
| IXI.AX | A$99.56 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 23.00 | A$4.29 | +2.47% |
| PGF.AX | A$2.63 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 8.53 | A$0.30 | +4.30% |
| HACK.AX | A$15.67 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 31.55 | A$0.48 | +0.52% |
| WGB.AX | A$2.50 | +0.00% | 900M | 7.41 | A$0.34 | +4.96% |
| NGI.AX | A$1.70 | +0.00% | 830.7M | 3.46 | A$0.49 | +2.63% |
| VVLU.AX | A$74.70 | +0.00% | 732.5M | N/A | N/A | +8.48% |
Stock Comparison
IFRA.AX vs IOO.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IOO.AX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while IOO.AX trades at A$164.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas IOO.AX's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to IOO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs IXJ.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IXJ.AX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while IXJ.AX trades at A$131.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas IXJ.AX's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to IXJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs ETHI.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ETHI.AX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while ETHI.AX trades at A$15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas ETHI.AX's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETHI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to ETHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs IXI.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IXI.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while IXI.AX trades at A$99.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas IXI.AX's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXI.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to IXI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs PGF.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PGF.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while PGF.AX trades at A$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas PGF.AX's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGF.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to PGF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs HACK.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HACK.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while HACK.AX trades at A$15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas HACK.AX's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HACK.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to HACK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs WGB.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WGB.AX has a market cap of 900M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while WGB.AX trades at A$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas WGB.AX's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGB.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to WGB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs NGI.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NGI.AX has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while NGI.AX trades at A$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas NGI.AX's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGI.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to NGI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs VVLU.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VVLU.AX has a market cap of 732.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while VVLU.AX trades at A$74.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas VVLU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVLU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to VVLU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs QLTY.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QLTY.AX has a market cap of 721.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while QLTY.AX trades at A$32.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas QLTY.AX's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QLTY.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to QLTY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs FGG.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FGG.AX has a market cap of 600.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while FGG.AX trades at A$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas FGG.AX's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGG.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to FGG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs IHOO.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IHOO.AX has a market cap of 477.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while IHOO.AX trades at A$194.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas IHOO.AX's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHOO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX and IHOO.AX have similar daily volatility (0.84).
IFRA.AX vs VBLD.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VBLD.AX has a market cap of 455.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while VBLD.AX trades at A$72.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas VBLD.AX's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBLD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to VBLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs DJRE.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DJRE.AX has a market cap of 427.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while DJRE.AX trades at A$21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas DJRE.AX's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DJRE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to DJRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs ALI.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALI.AX has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while ALI.AX trades at A$2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas ALI.AX's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALI.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to ALI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs WCMQ.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WCMQ.AX has a market cap of 369.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while WCMQ.AX trades at A$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas WCMQ.AX's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WCMQ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to WCMQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs WDIV.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WDIV.AX has a market cap of 281.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while WDIV.AX trades at A$20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas WDIV.AX's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDIV.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to WDIV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs RBTZ.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RBTZ.AX has a market cap of 261.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while RBTZ.AX trades at A$14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas RBTZ.AX's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTZ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to RBTZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs GVF.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GVF.AX has a market cap of 256.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while GVF.AX trades at A$1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas GVF.AX's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GVF.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to GVF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs ESTX.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESTX.AX has a market cap of 236.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while ESTX.AX trades at A$105.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas ESTX.AX's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESTX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to ESTX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs FEMX.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FEMX.AX has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while FEMX.AX trades at A$6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas FEMX.AX's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMX.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to FEMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs TGF.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TGF.AX has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while TGF.AX trades at A$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas TGF.AX's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGF.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to TGF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs FUEL.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FUEL.AX has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while FUEL.AX trades at A$6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas FUEL.AX's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUEL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to FUEL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs GDC.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GDC.AX has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while GDC.AX trades at A$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas GDC.AX's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDC.AX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to GDC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs MNRS.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MNRS.AX has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while MNRS.AX trades at A$9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas MNRS.AX's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNRS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to MNRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs BNKS.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BNKS.AX has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while BNKS.AX trades at A$9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas BNKS.AX's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to BNKS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs ZYAU.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZYAU.AX has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while ZYAU.AX trades at A$8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas ZYAU.AX's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZYAU.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to ZYAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs ZYUS.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZYUS.AX has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while ZYUS.AX trades at A$14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas ZYUS.AX's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZYUS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to ZYUS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs FOOD.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FOOD.AX has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while FOOD.AX trades at A$6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas FOOD.AX's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOOD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to FOOD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs GFL.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GFL.AX has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while GFL.AX trades at A$3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas GFL.AX's P/E ratio is -34.45. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to GFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs UBW.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UBW.AX has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while UBW.AX trades at A$28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas UBW.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBW.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to UBW.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs CURE.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CURE.AX has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while CURE.AX trades at A$43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas CURE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURE.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to CURE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs FPC.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FPC.AX has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while FPC.AX trades at A$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas FPC.AX's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPC.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to FPC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs HGEN.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HGEN.AX has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while HGEN.AX trades at A$4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas HGEN.AX's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGEN.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to HGEN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs GOLD.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOLD.AX has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while GOLD.AX trades at A$46.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas GOLD.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to GOLD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs VMIN.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VMIN.AX has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while VMIN.AX trades at A$64.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas VMIN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMIN.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to VMIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs UBP.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UBP.AX has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while UBP.AX trades at A$28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas UBP.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBP.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to UBP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs APL.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, APL.AX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while APL.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas APL.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APL.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to APL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs UBJ.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UBJ.AX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while UBJ.AX trades at A$23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas UBJ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBJ.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to UBJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs HYGG.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HYGG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while HYGG.AX trades at A$7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas HYGG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYGG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to HYGG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs CGA.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CGA.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while CGA.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas CGA.AX's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGA.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to CGA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs WRLD.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WRLD.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while WRLD.AX trades at A$20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas WRLD.AX's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRLD.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to WRLD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs MGF.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MGF.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while MGF.AX trades at A$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas MGF.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGF.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is less volatile compared to MGF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.
IFRA.AX vs MHG.AX Comparison
IFRA.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFRA.AX stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MHG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFRA.AX is priced at A$22.58, while MHG.AX trades at A$4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFRA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 20.36, whereas MHG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFRA.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFRA.AX is more volatile compared to MHG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFRA.AX.