Infineon Technologies AG
Infineon Technologies AG IFNNF Peers
See (IFNNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFNNF | $37.55 | +4.19% | 48.78B | 35.42 | $1.06 | +0.97% |
ASMLF | $744.36 | -1.74% | 292.74B | 30.32 | $24.55 | +0.93% |
TOELY | $80.70 | -2.69% | 73.94B | 20.18 | $4.00 | +0.78% |
SLEGF | $188.10 | +300.00% | 72.30B | 376.19 | $0.50 | N/A |
IFNNY | $37.39 | -0.95% | 48.58B | 35.27 | $1.06 | +0.66% |
RNECY | $6.27 | -2.49% | 45.07B | 20.23 | $0.31 | +0.89% |
ATEYY | $50.10 | -1.46% | 36.81B | 34.08 | $1.47 | +0.36% |
ADTTF | $47.90 | +14.05% | 35.15B | 32.59 | $1.47 | +0.55% |
ASMIY | $545.77 | -0.71% | 26.80B | 51.20 | $10.66 | +0.54% |
ASMXF | $535.95 | -7.01% | 26.32B | 49.21 | $10.89 | +0.56% |
Stock Comparison
IFNNF vs ASMLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ASMLF has a market cap of 292.74B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ASMLF trades at $744.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ASMLF's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMLF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs TOELY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, TOELY has a market cap of 73.94B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while TOELY trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas TOELY's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOELY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to TOELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLEGF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SLEGF has a market cap of 72.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SLEGF trades at $188.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SLEGF's P/E ratio is 376.19. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SLEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs IFNNY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, IFNNY has a market cap of 48.58B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while IFNNY trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas IFNNY's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFNNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to IFNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNECY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, RNECY has a market cap of 45.07B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while RNECY trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas RNECY's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNECY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RNECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ATEYY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ATEYY has a market cap of 36.81B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ATEYY trades at $50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ATEYY's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATEYY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ATEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ADTTF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ADTTF has a market cap of 35.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ADTTF trades at $47.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ADTTF's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ADTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ASMIY has a market cap of 26.80B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ASMIY trades at $545.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ASMIY's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ASMXF has a market cap of 26.32B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ASMXF trades at $535.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ASMXF's P/E ratio is 49.21. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMXF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and ASMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs DSCSY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, DSCSY has a market cap of 26.22B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while DSCSY trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas DSCSY's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSCSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to DSCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNECF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, RNECF has a market cap of 22.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while RNECF trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas RNECF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNECF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and RNECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs STMEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, STMEF has a market cap of 21.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while STMEF trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas STMEF's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STMEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to STMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs DISPF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, DISPF has a market cap of 19.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while DISPF trades at $181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas DISPF's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DISPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and DISPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs BESIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, BESIY has a market cap of 10.29B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while BESIY trades at $129.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas BESIY's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BESIY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to BESIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs LSRCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, LSRCF has a market cap of 9.96B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while LSRCF trades at $110.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas LSRCF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSRCF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to LSRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs HHUSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, HHUSF has a market cap of 9.72B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while HHUSF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas HHUSF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HHUSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and HHUSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs BESVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, BESVF has a market cap of 9.47B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while BESVF trades at $119.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas BESVF's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BESVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to BESVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs LSRCY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, LSRCY has a market cap of 9.21B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while LSRCY trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas LSRCY's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSRCY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to LSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs DINRF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, DINRF has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while DINRF trades at $63.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas DINRF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DINRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to DINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ASMVF has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ASMVF trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ASMVF's P/E ratio is 84.28. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ROHCY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ROHCY has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ROHCY trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ROHCY's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROHCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ROHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ROHCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ROHCF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ROHCF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ROHCF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ROHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SUMCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SUMCF has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SUMCF trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SUMCF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SUMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SUOPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SUOPY has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SUOPY trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SUOPY's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUOPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SUOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MLXSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, MLXSF has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while MLXSF trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas MLXSF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLXSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MLXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NDCVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, NDCVF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while NDCVF trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas NDCVF's P/E ratio is -201.83. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDCVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to NDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NRSDY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, NRSDY has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while NRSDY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas NRSDY's P/E ratio is -186.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRSDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to NRSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLOIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SLOIY has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SLOIY trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SLOIY's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLOIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SLOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AMSSY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, AMSSY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while AMSSY trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas AMSSY's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMSSY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AMSSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLOIF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SLOIF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SLOIF trades at $48.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SLOIF's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLOIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SLOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AIXXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, AIXXF has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while AIXXF trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas AIXXF's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIXXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and AIXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs AWEVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, AWEVF has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while AWEVF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas AWEVF's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AWEVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AWEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AIIXY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, AIIXY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while AIIXY trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas AIIXY's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIIXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AIIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs OXINF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, OXINF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while OXINF trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas OXINF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OXINF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to OXINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SSLLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SSLLF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SSLLF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SSLLF's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SSLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs FUJXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, FUJXF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while FUJXF trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas FUJXF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUJXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to FUJXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SANJF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SANJF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SANJF trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SANJF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANJF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SANJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMVY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ASMVY has a market cap of 988.12M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ASMVY trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ASMVY's P/E ratio is 66.73. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SESMF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SESMF has a market cap of 837.76M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SESMF trades at $43.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SESMF's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SESMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SESMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs XFABF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, XFABF has a market cap of 770.73M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while XFABF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas XFABF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XFABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to XFABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AUKUF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, AUKUF has a market cap of 746.88M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while AUKUF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas AUKUF's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUKUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AUKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PVLYL Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, PVLYL has a market cap of 691.54M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while PVLYL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas PVLYL's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PVLYL's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and PVLYL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SILXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SILXF has a market cap of 596.08M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SILXF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SILXF's P/E ratio is -41.83. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SILXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SILXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SILXY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SILXY has a market cap of 594.18M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SILXY trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SILXY's P/E ratio is -41.70. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SILXY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SILXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MITNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, MITNF has a market cap of 509.09M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while MITNF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas MITNF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and MITNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SFDMY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SFDMY has a market cap of 471.51M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SFDMY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SFDMY's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFDMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SFDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs THPTF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, THPTF has a market cap of 369.88M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while THPTF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas THPTF's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THPTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and THPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs BRCHF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, BRCHF has a market cap of 338.29M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while BRCHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas BRCHF's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to BRCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs WBTNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, WBTNF has a market cap of 246.36M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while WBTNF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas WBTNF's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBTNF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and WBTNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs ALMU Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 202.50M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ALMU trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -49.31. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NLST Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, NLST has a market cap of 200.61M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while NLST trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas NLST's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLST's ROE of +6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to NLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MCRNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, MCRNF has a market cap of 182.13M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while MCRNF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas MCRNF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCRNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MCRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs IQEPF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, IQEPF has a market cap of 149.56M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while IQEPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas IQEPF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IQEPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to IQEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs IQEPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, IQEPY has a market cap of 139.85M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while IQEPY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas IQEPY's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IQEPY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to IQEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNWEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, RNWEF has a market cap of 117.78M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while RNWEF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas RNWEF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNWEF's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RNWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs FRDSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, FRDSF has a market cap of 100.12M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while FRDSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas FRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRDSF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and FRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs QNCCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, QNCCF has a market cap of 86.89M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while QNCCF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas QNCCF's P/E ratio is -45.49. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QNCCF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to QNCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNWEY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, RNWEY has a market cap of 75.71M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while RNWEY trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas RNWEY's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNWEY's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RNWEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PAGDF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, PAGDF has a market cap of 67.07M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while PAGDF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas PAGDF's P/E ratio is -56.40. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and PAGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs BUGLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, BUGLF has a market cap of 57.06M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while BUGLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas BUGLF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BUGLF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and BUGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs PRKR Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, PRKR has a market cap of 56.33M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while PRKR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas PRKR's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRKR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to PRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MYBUF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, MYBUF has a market cap of 52.05M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while MYBUF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas MYBUF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MYBUF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MYBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ARRXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ARRXF has a market cap of 44.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ARRXF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ARRXF's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARRXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ARRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs OBDCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, OBDCF has a market cap of 34.74M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while OBDCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas OBDCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OBDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and OBDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SODI Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SODI has a market cap of 33.34M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SODI trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SODI's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SODI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MMTIF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, MMTIF has a market cap of 33.31M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while MMTIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas MMTIF's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMTIF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MMTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NNOCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, NNOCF has a market cap of 33.08M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while NNOCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas NNOCF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNOCF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and NNOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs CYBL Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, CYBL has a market cap of 30.77M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while CYBL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas CYBL's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYBL's ROE of -23.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to CYBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NXTBF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, NXTBF has a market cap of 26.47M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while NXTBF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas NXTBF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NXTBF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and NXTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SCIA Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SCIA has a market cap of 19.87M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SCIA trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SCIA's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCIA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SCIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs GUER Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, GUER has a market cap of 14.46M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while GUER trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas GUER's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GUER's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and GUER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs WSKEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, WSKEF has a market cap of 13.38M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while WSKEF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas WSKEF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSKEF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to WSKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs BCHPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, BCHPY has a market cap of 6.56M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while BCHPY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas BCHPY's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCHPY's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and BCHPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SMTK Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SMTK has a market cap of 5.70M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SMTK trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SMTK's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMTK's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PSFT Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, PSFT has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while PSFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas PSFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and PSFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs RBCN Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, RBCN has a market cap of 4.85M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while RBCN trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas RBCN's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RBCN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RBCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MANZF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, MANZF has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while MANZF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas MANZF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and MANZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs NMGC Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, NMGC has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while NMGC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas NMGC's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMGC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and NMGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SPVNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SPVNF has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SPVNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SPVNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPVNF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SPVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs STRI Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, STRI has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while STRI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas STRI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and STRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs ITCJ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ITCJ has a market cap of 335013.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ITCJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ITCJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITCJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ITCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ODII Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, ODII has a market cap of 292018.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while ODII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas ODII's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ODII's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and ODII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs GSTX Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, GSTX has a market cap of 226112.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while GSTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas GSTX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and GSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs CXCQ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, CXCQ has a market cap of 165000.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while CXCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas CXCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to CXCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs TXCCQ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, TXCCQ has a market cap of 4665.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while TXCCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas TXCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TXCCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and TXCCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs MTNX Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, MTNX has a market cap of 4453.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while MTNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas MTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs STRB Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, STRB has a market cap of 1471.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while STRB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas STRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to STRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SRII Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, SRII has a market cap of 350.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while SRII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas SRII's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SRII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs HSCO Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 48.78B. In comparison, HSCO has a market cap of 200.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $37.55, while HSCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.42, whereas HSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HSCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to HSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.