Infineon Technologies AG
Infineon Technologies AG IFNNF Peers
See (IFNNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFNNF | $40.10 | -1.34% | 52.1B | 37.13 | $1.08 | +0.91% |
| ASMLF | $758.35 | +2.22% | 298.2B | 30.21 | $25.10 | +0.92% |
| TOELY | $82.33 | +1.57% | 76.1B | 20.08 | $4.10 | +0.77% |
| SLEGF | $188.10 | +300.00% | 72.3B | 376.19 | $0.50 | N/A |
| IFNNY | $40.75 | +0.82% | 52.9B | 37.73 | $1.08 | +0.60% |
| RNECY | $6.63 | +2.65% | 47.7B | 20.72 | $0.32 | +0.84% |
| ATEYY | $55.29 | +2.79% | 40.6B | 36.14 | $1.53 | +0.33% |
| ADTTF | $47.90 | N/A | 35.1B | 31.31 | $1.53 | +0.55% |
| ASMIY | $576.50 | +2.83% | 28.3B | 51.66 | $11.16 | +0.58% |
| ASMXF | $564.09 | +2.24% | 27.7B | 51.28 | $11.00 | +0.53% |
Stock Comparison
IFNNF vs ASMLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ASMLF has a market cap of 298.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ASMLF trades at $758.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ASMLF's P/E ratio is 30.21. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMLF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs TOELY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, TOELY has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while TOELY trades at $82.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas TOELY's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOELY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to TOELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLEGF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SLEGF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SLEGF trades at $188.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SLEGF's P/E ratio is 376.19. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SLEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs IFNNY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, IFNNY has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while IFNNY trades at $40.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas IFNNY's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFNNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to IFNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNECY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, RNECY has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while RNECY trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas RNECY's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNECY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RNECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ATEYY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ATEYY has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ATEYY trades at $55.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ATEYY's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATEYY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ATEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ADTTF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ADTTF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ADTTF trades at $47.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ADTTF's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and ADTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs ASMIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ASMIY has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ASMIY trades at $576.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ASMIY's P/E ratio is 51.66. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ASMXF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ASMXF trades at $564.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ASMXF's P/E ratio is 51.28. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMXF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs STMEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, STMEF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while STMEF trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas STMEF's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STMEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and STMEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs DSCSY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, DSCSY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while DSCSY trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas DSCSY's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSCSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to DSCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNECF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, RNECF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while RNECF trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas RNECF's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNECF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and RNECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs DISPF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, DISPF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while DISPF trades at $181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas DISPF's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DISPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and DISPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs BESIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, BESIY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while BESIY trades at $129.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas BESIY's P/E ratio is 50.37. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BESIY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to BESIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs HHUSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, HHUSF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while HHUSF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas HHUSF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HHUSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and HHUSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs BESVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, BESVF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while BESVF trades at $123.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas BESVF's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BESVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to BESVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs LSRCY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, LSRCY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while LSRCY trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas LSRCY's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSRCY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to LSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs LSRCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, LSRCF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while LSRCF trades at $98.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas LSRCF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSRCF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to LSRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs DINRF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, DINRF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while DINRF trades at $75.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas DINRF's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DINRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and DINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs ROHCY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ROHCY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ROHCY trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ROHCY's P/E ratio is -12.63. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROHCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ROHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ASMVF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ASMVF trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ASMVF's P/E ratio is 84.28. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ROHCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ROHCF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ROHCF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ROHCF's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ROHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MLXSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, MLXSF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while MLXSF trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas MLXSF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLXSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MLXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NDCVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, NDCVF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while NDCVF trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas NDCVF's P/E ratio is -218.83. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDCVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and NDCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs NRSDY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, NRSDY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while NRSDY trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas NRSDY's P/E ratio is -210.83. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRSDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and NRSDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SUOPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SUOPY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SUOPY trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SUOPY's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUOPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SUOPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SUMCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SUMCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SUMCF trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SUMCF's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SUMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLOIF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SLOIF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SLOIF trades at $53.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SLOIF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLOIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SLOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs AMSSY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, AMSSY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while AMSSY trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas AMSSY's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMSSY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AMSSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLOIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SLOIY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SLOIY trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SLOIY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLOIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SLOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AIIXY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, AIIXY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while AIIXY trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas AIIXY's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIIXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AIIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AWEVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, AWEVF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while AWEVF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas AWEVF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AWEVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AWEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AIXXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, AIXXF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while AIXXF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas AIXXF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIXXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AIXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs OXINF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, OXINF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while OXINF trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas OXINF's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OXINF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to OXINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SSLLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SSLLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SSLLF trades at $40.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SSLLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SSLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs FUJXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, FUJXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while FUJXF trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas FUJXF's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUJXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to FUJXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SANJF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SANJF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SANJF trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SANJF's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANJF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SANJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMVY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ASMVY has a market cap of 975.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ASMVY trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ASMVY's P/E ratio is 65.86. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SESMF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SESMF has a market cap of 854.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SESMF trades at $44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SESMF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SESMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SESMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs XFABF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, XFABF has a market cap of 827.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while XFABF trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas XFABF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XFABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and XFABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs AUKUF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, AUKUF has a market cap of 746.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while AUKUF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas AUKUF's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUKUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AUKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PVLYL Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, PVLYL has a market cap of 691.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while PVLYL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas PVLYL's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PVLYL's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and PVLYL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SILXY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SILXY has a market cap of 542.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SILXY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SILXY's P/E ratio is -27.14. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SILXY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SILXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SILXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SILXF has a market cap of 535.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SILXF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SILXF's P/E ratio is -28.12. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SILXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SILXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MITNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, MITNF has a market cap of 507.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while MITNF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas MITNF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and MITNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SFDMY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SFDMY has a market cap of 471.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SFDMY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SFDMY's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFDMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SFDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs THPTF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, THPTF has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while THPTF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas THPTF's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THPTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and THPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs BRCHF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, BRCHF has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while BRCHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas BRCHF's P/E ratio is -16.80. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to BRCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs WBTNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, WBTNF has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while WBTNF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas WBTNF's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBTNF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and WBTNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs NLST Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, NLST has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while NLST trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas NLST's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLST's ROE of +6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to NLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs QNCCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, QNCCF has a market cap of 196.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while QNCCF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas QNCCF's P/E ratio is -34.33. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QNCCF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to QNCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MCRNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, MCRNF has a market cap of 164.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while MCRNF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas MCRNF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCRNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MCRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs IQEPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, IQEPY has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while IQEPY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas IQEPY's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IQEPY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to IQEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs IQEPF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, IQEPF has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while IQEPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas IQEPF's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IQEPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to IQEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNWEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, RNWEF has a market cap of 117.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while RNWEF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas RNWEF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNWEF's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RNWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs FRDSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, FRDSF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while FRDSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas FRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRDSF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and FRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs PAGDF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, PAGDF has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while PAGDF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas PAGDF's P/E ratio is -56.40. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and PAGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs BUGLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, BUGLF has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while BUGLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas BUGLF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BUGLF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and BUGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs MYBUF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, MYBUF has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while MYBUF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas MYBUF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MYBUF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and MYBUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs ARRXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ARRXF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ARRXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ARRXF's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARRXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and ARRXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs RNWEY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, RNWEY has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while RNWEY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas RNWEY's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNWEY's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RNWEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PRKR Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, PRKR has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while PRKR trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas PRKR's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRKR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to PRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs OBDCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, OBDCF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while OBDCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas OBDCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OBDCF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and OBDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SODI Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SODI has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SODI trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SODI's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SODI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SODI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs CYBL Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, CYBL has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while CYBL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas CYBL's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYBL's ROE of -23.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to CYBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NNOCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, NNOCF has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while NNOCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas NNOCF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNOCF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to NNOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NXTBF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, NXTBF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while NXTBF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas NXTBF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NXTBF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and NXTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs MMTIF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, MMTIF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while MMTIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas MMTIF's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMTIF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MMTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SCIA Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SCIA has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SCIA trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SCIA's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCIA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SCIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs WSKEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, WSKEF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while WSKEF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas WSKEF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSKEF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to WSKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs GUER Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, GUER has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while GUER trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas GUER's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GUER's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to GUER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs BCHPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, BCHPY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while BCHPY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas BCHPY's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCHPY's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and BCHPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs PSFT Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, PSFT has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while PSFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas PSFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and PSFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs RBCN Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, RBCN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while RBCN trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas RBCN's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RBCN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RBCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MANZF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, MANZF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while MANZF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas MANZF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and MANZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs NMGC Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, NMGC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while NMGC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas NMGC's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMGC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and NMGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs SPVNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SPVNF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SPVNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SPVNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPVNF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SPVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs STRI Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, STRI has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while STRI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas STRI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and STRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs ITCJ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ITCJ has a market cap of 335K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ITCJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ITCJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITCJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ITCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ODII Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, ODII has a market cap of 292K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while ODII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas ODII's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ODII's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and ODII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs CXCQ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, CXCQ has a market cap of 270K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while CXCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas CXCQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to CXCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs GSTX Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, GSTX has a market cap of 113.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while GSTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas GSTX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and GSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs TXCCQ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, TXCCQ has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while TXCCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas TXCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TXCCQ's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to TXCCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MTNX Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, MTNX has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while MTNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas MTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTNX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs STRB Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, STRB has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while STRB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas STRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to STRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SRII Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, SRII has a market cap of 350. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while SRII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas SRII's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF and SRII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IFNNF vs HSCO Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 52.1B. In comparison, HSCO has a market cap of 200. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $40.10, while HSCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.13, whereas HSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HSCO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to HSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.