Infineon Technologies AG
Infineon Technologies AG IFNNF Peers
See (IFNNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFNNF | $41.53 | +2.92% | 54B | 38.10 | $1.09 | +0.88% |
| ASMLF | $800.72 | +0.30% | 314.9B | 31.20 | $25.66 | +0.88% |
| TOELY | $96.13 | +0.24% | 87.9B | 23.57 | $4.07 | +1.26% |
| SLEGF | $188.10 | +0.00% | 72.3B | 376.19 | $0.50 | N/A |
| IFNNY | $42.58 | +2.23% | 55.3B | 39.04 | $1.09 | +0.58% |
| ATEYY | $73.96 | -0.24% | 54B | 48.70 | $1.51 | +0.25% |
| ADTTF | $71.31 | +27.57% | 52.3B | 47.54 | $1.50 | +0.37% |
| RNECY | $6.14 | +0.00% | 44.2B | 19.84 | $0.31 | +0.91% |
| DSCSY | $29.52 | -0.34% | 32.1B | 37.96 | $0.78 | +0.77% |
| ASMIY | $642.71 | +1.28% | 31.5B | 57.04 | $11.23 | +0.52% |
Stock Comparison
IFNNF vs ASMLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ASMLF has a market cap of 314.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ASMLF trades at $800.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ASMLF's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMLF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ASMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs TOELY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, TOELY has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while TOELY trades at $96.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas TOELY's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOELY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to TOELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLEGF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SLEGF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SLEGF trades at $188.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SLEGF's P/E ratio is 376.19. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs IFNNY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, IFNNY has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while IFNNY trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas IFNNY's P/E ratio is 39.04. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFNNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to IFNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ATEYY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ATEYY has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ATEYY trades at $73.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ATEYY's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATEYY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ATEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ADTTF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ADTTF has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ADTTF trades at $71.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ADTTF's P/E ratio is 47.54. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ADTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNECY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, RNECY has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while RNECY trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas RNECY's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNECY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RNECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs DSCSY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, DSCSY has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while DSCSY trades at $29.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DSCSY's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSCSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to DSCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ASMIY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ASMIY trades at $642.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ASMIY's P/E ratio is 57.04. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ASMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ASMXF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ASMXF trades at $636.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ASMXF's P/E ratio is 56.19. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMXF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ASMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs STMEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, STMEF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while STMEF trades at $28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas STMEF's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STMEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to STMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNECF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, RNECF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while RNECF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas RNECF's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNECF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to RNECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs DISPF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, DISPF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while DISPF trades at $181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DISPF's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DISPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to DISPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs LSRCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, LSRCF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while LSRCF trades at $135.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas LSRCF's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSRCF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to LSRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs LSRCY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, LSRCY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while LSRCY trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas LSRCY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSRCY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to LSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs BESIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, BESIY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while BESIY trades at $150.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BESIY's P/E ratio is 57.60. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BESIY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to BESIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs BESVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, BESVF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while BESVF trades at $142.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BESVF's P/E ratio is 54.37. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BESVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to BESVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs HHUSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, HHUSF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while HHUSF trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas HHUSF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HHUSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to HHUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs DINRF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, DINRF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while DINRF trades at $75.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas DINRF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DINRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to DINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ROHCY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ROHCY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ROHCY trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ROHCY's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROHCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ROHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ASMVF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ASMVF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ASMVF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ASMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ROHCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ROHCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ROHCF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ROHCF's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ROHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SUMCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SUMCF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SUMCF trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SUMCF's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SUMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SUOPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SUOPY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SUOPY trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SUOPY's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUOPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SUOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AMSSY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, AMSSY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while AMSSY trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas AMSSY's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMSSY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to AMSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NDCVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, NDCVF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while NDCVF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NDCVF's P/E ratio is -221.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDCVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to NDCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MLXSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, MLXSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while MLXSF trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MLXSF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLXSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to MLXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NRSDY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, NRSDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while NRSDY trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NRSDY's P/E ratio is -192.50. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRSDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to NRSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLOIF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SLOIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SLOIF trades at $60.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SLOIF's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLOIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SLOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AIXXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, AIXXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while AIXXF trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas AIXXF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIXXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to AIXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SLOIY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SLOIY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SLOIY trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SLOIY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLOIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SLOIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AWEVF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, AWEVF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while AWEVF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas AWEVF's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AWEVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to AWEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs OXINF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, OXINF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while OXINF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas OXINF's P/E ratio is 43.11. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OXINF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to OXINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AIIXY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, AIIXY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while AIIXY trades at $34.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas AIIXY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIIXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to AIIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SSLLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SSLLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SSLLF trades at $46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SSLLF's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SSLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs FUJXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, FUJXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while FUJXF trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas FUJXF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUJXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to FUJXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs XFABF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, XFABF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while XFABF trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas XFABF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XFABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to XFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SANJF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SANJF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SANJF trades at $41.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SANJF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANJF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SANJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ASMVY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ASMVY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ASMVY trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ASMVY's P/E ratio is 68.63. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASMVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ASMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SESMF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SESMF has a market cap of 955.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SESMF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SESMF's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SESMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SESMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs AUKUF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, AUKUF has a market cap of 890.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while AUKUF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas AUKUF's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUKUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to AUKUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PVLYL Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, PVLYL has a market cap of 691.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while PVLYL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PVLYL's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PVLYL's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to PVLYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SILXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SILXF has a market cap of 685.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SILXF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SILXF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SILXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SILXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SILXY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SILXY has a market cap of 678.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SILXY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SILXY's P/E ratio is -33.93. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SILXY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SILXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MITNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, MITNF has a market cap of 507.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while MITNF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MITNF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to MITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SFDMY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SFDMY has a market cap of 409.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SFDMY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SFDMY's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFDMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SFDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs THPTF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, THPTF has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while THPTF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas THPTF's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THPTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to THPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs BRCHF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, BRCHF has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while BRCHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BRCHF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to BRCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs QNCCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, QNCCF has a market cap of 236.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while QNCCF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas QNCCF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QNCCF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to QNCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs WBTNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, WBTNF has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while WBTNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas WBTNF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBTNF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to WBTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NLST Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, NLST has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while NLST trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NLST's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLST's ROE of +6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to NLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MCRNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, MCRNF has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while MCRNF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MCRNF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCRNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to MCRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs IQEPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, IQEPY has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while IQEPY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas IQEPY's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IQEPY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to IQEPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs IQEPF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, IQEPF has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while IQEPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas IQEPF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IQEPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to IQEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs FRDSF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, FRDSF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while FRDSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas FRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRDSF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to FRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNWEY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, RNWEY has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while RNWEY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas RNWEY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNWEY's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to RNWEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RNWEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, RNWEF has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while RNWEF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas RNWEF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNWEF's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to RNWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs BUGLF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, BUGLF has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while BUGLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BUGLF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BUGLF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to BUGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PAGDF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, PAGDF has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while PAGDF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PAGDF's P/E ratio is -56.40. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to PAGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs CYBL Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, CYBL has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while CYBL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CYBL's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYBL's ROE of -23.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to CYBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ARRXF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ARRXF has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ARRXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ARRXF's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARRXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to ARRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs OBDCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, OBDCF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while OBDCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas OBDCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OBDCF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to OBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SODI Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SODI has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SODI trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SODI's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SODI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PRKR Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, PRKR has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while PRKR trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PRKR's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRKR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to PRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MYBUF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, MYBUF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while MYBUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MYBUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MYBUF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to MYBUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MMTIF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, MMTIF has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while MMTIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MMTIF's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMTIF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to MMTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NXTBF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, NXTBF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while NXTBF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NXTBF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NXTBF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to NXTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NNOCF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, NNOCF has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while NNOCF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NNOCF's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNOCF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to NNOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SCIA Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SCIA has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SCIA trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SCIA's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCIA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SCIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs WSKEF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, WSKEF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while WSKEF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas WSKEF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSKEF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to WSKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs GUER Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, GUER has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while GUER trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas GUER's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GUER's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to GUER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs BCHPY Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, BCHPY has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while BCHPY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas BCHPY's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCHPY's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to BCHPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs PSFT Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, PSFT has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while PSFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas PSFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to PSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs RBCN Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, RBCN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while RBCN trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas RBCN's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RBCN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to RBCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MANZF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, MANZF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while MANZF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MANZF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to MANZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SPVNF Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SPVNF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SPVNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SPVNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPVNF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is less volatile compared to SPVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs NMGC Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, NMGC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while NMGC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas NMGC's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMGC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to NMGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs STRI Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, STRI has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while STRI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas STRI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to STRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ITCJ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ITCJ has a market cap of 335K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ITCJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ITCJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITCJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ITCJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs ODII Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, ODII has a market cap of 292K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while ODII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas ODII's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ODII's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to ODII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs CXCQ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, CXCQ has a market cap of 165K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while CXCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas CXCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to CXCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs GSTX Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, GSTX has a market cap of 113.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while GSTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas GSTX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to GSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs TXCCQ Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, TXCCQ has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while TXCCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas TXCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TXCCQ's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to TXCCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs MTNX Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, MTNX has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while MTNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas MTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTNX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to MTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs STRB Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, STRB has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while STRB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas STRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to STRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs SRII Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, SRII has a market cap of 350. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while SRII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas SRII's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to SRII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.
IFNNF vs HSCO Comparison
IFNNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFNNF stands at 54B. In comparison, HSCO has a market cap of 200. Regarding current trading prices, IFNNF is priced at $41.53, while HSCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.10, whereas HSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFNNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HSCO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IFNNF is more volatile compared to HSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFNNF.