Informa plc
Informa plc (IFJPY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IFJPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFJPY | $23.27 | +0.56% | 14.9B | 153.93 | $0.15 | +2.23% |
| IDWM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 108B | -61.11 | -$0.72 | N/A |
| RLXXF | $51.75 | -1.89% | 95.8B | 37.68 | $1.39 | +1.59% |
| IFPJF | $11.58 | +0.00% | 15B | 165.43 | $0.07 | +2.21% |
| PSORF | $14.35 | +1.56% | 9.7B | 16.88 | $0.85 | +2.16% |
| SBSNY | $39.71 | +1.17% | 8.3B | 12.89 | $3.08 | +2.85% |
| SBBTF | $32.99 | +0.00% | 7.8B | 10.78 | $3.06 | +3.10% |
| SBSNF | $27.37 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 26.57 | $1.03 | +3.84% |
| KDKWF | $26.98 | +0.00% | 4B | 77.09 | $0.35 | +0.75% |
| SHXWF | $1.08 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 6.00 | $0.18 | +7.74% |
Stock Comparison
IFJPY vs IDWM Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while IDWM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -61.11. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to IDWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check IDWM's competition here
IFJPY vs RLXXF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RLXXF has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while RLXXF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas RLXXF's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RLXXF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to RLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check RLXXF's competition here
IFJPY vs IFPJF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while IFPJF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 165.43. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to IFPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check IFPJF's competition here
IFJPY vs PSORF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while PSORF trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to PSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check PSORF's competition here
IFJPY vs SBSNY Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while SBSNY trades at $39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to SBSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check SBSNY's competition here
IFJPY vs SBBTF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while SBBTF trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to SBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check SBBTF's competition here
IFJPY vs SBSNF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check SBSNF's competition here
IFJPY vs KDKWF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while KDKWF trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 77.09. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to KDKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check KDKWF's competition here
IFJPY vs SHXWF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to SHXWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check SHXWF's competition here
IFJPY vs CNGO Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CNGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while CNGO trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas CNGO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNGO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to CNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check CNGO's competition here
IFJPY vs FRNWF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FRNWF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while FRNWF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas FRNWF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRNWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to FRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check FRNWF's competition here
IFJPY vs RZSMF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 620.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while RZSMF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to RZSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check RZSMF's competition here
IFJPY vs MDDCF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDDCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to MDDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check MDDCF's competition here
IFJPY vs GPOPF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to GPOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check GPOPF's competition here
IFJPY vs STRYF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while STRYF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check STRYF's competition here
IFJPY vs TOCOF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to TOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check TOCOF's competition here
IFJPY vs GWOX Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 191.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while GWOX trades at $419.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to GWOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check GWOX's competition here
IFJPY vs PCDAF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check PCDAF's competition here
IFJPY vs YLWDF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, YLWDF has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while YLWDF trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas YLWDF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YLWDF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to YLWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check YLWDF's competition here
IFJPY vs CMTX Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while CMTX trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check CMTX's competition here
IFJPY vs SMWPY Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check SMWPY's competition here
IFJPY vs HKGEF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while HKGEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check HKGEF's competition here
IFJPY vs STAOF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while STAOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to STAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check STAOF's competition here
IFJPY vs SADL Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while SADL trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check SADL's competition here
IFJPY vs GLMFF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while GLMFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to GLMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check GLMFF's competition here
IFJPY vs XLMDF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while XLMDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to XLMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check XLMDF's competition here
IFJPY vs DTRL Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while DTRL trades at $295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to DTRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check DTRL's competition here
IFJPY vs FPNUF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check FPNUF's competition here
IFJPY vs FMPR Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while FMPR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check FMPR's competition here
IFJPY vs LEBGF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while LEBGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to LEBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check LEBGF's competition here
IFJPY vs PEDH Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 44.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while PEDH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to PEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check PEDH's competition here
IFJPY vs PDOS Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while PDOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDOS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check PDOS's competition here
IFJPY vs BKMP Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while BKMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BKMP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to BKMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check BKMP's competition here
IFJPY vs DIGI Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while DIGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to DIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check DIGI's competition here
IFJPY vs HRDIL Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRDIL's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to HRDIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check HRDIL's competition here
IFJPY vs HRDI Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while HRDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRDI's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to HRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check HRDI's competition here
IFJPY vs ACNI Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 439. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while ACNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check ACNI's competition here
IFJPY vs MAHI Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MAHI has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while MAHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas MAHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAHI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to MAHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check MAHI's competition here
IFJPY vs SALN Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while SALN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SALN's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check SALN's competition here
IFJPY vs YLWWF Comparison August 2025
IFJPY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFJPY stands at 14.9B. In comparison, YLWWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IFJPY is priced at $23.27, while YLWWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 153.93, whereas YLWWF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, IFJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YLWWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFJPY is more volatile compared to YLWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFJPY.Check YLWWF's competition here