Invinity Energy Systems plc

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, FOJCY has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while FOJCY trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas FOJCY's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FOJCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to FOJCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, OEZVF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while OEZVF trades at $76.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas OEZVF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OEZVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to OEZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, OEZVY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while OEZVY trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas OEZVY's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OEZVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to OEZVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CZAVF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CZAVF trades at $60.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CZAVF's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CZAVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CZAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CEZYY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CEZYY trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CEZYY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CEZYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CEZYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, DNNGY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while DNNGY trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas DNNGY's P/E ratio is 105.79. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DNNGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to DNNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, DOGEF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while DOGEF trades at $43.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas DOGEF's P/E ratio is 105.52. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DOGEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to DOGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CLPXF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CLPXF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CLPXF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CLPXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CLPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, KAEPY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while KAEPY trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas KAEPY's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KAEPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to KAEPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, FOJCF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while FOJCF trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas FOJCF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FOJCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to FOJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, KAEPF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while KAEPF trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas KAEPF's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KAEPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to KAEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, EDRVF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while EDRVF trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas EDRVF's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EDRVF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to EDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, MDDNF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while MDDNF trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas MDDNF's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MDDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to MDDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, BRENF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while BRENF trades at $17.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas BRENF's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BRENF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to BRENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, NOSPF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while NOSPF trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas NOSPF's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NOSPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to NOSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TKECF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TKECF trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TKECF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TKECF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TKECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, MGHTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while MGHTF trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas MGHTF's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MGHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to MGHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TKECY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TKECY trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TKECY's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TKECY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TKECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, IFUUF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while IFUUF trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas IFUUF's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IFUUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to IFUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, AGQPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while AGQPF trades at $14.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas AGQPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AGQPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to AGQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TEPCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TEPCF trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TEPCF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TEPCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TEPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, NPIFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while NPIFF trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas NPIFF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NPIFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to NPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, COENF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while COENF trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas COENF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to COENF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to COENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TEPCY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TEPCY trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TEPCY's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TEPCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TEPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, EPWDF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while EPWDF trades at $15.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas EPWDF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EPWDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to EPWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, DRXGF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while DRXGF trades at $9.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas DRXGF's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DRXGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to DRXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, PUPOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while PUPOF trades at $11.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas PUPOF's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PUPOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to PUPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, EDRWY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while EDRWY trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas EDRWY's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EDRWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to EDRWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CPOIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CPOIF trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CPOIF's P/E ratio is 459.09. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CPOIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to CPOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, STECF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while STECF trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas STECF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to STECF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to STECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CLPXY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CLPXY trades at $8.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CLPXY's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CLPXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CLPXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, DRXGY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while DRXGY trades at $18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas DRXGY's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DRXGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to DRXGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TREAY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TREAY trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TREAY's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TREAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TREAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TRSWF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TRSWF trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TRSWF's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TRSWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TRSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, BRLXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while BRLXF trades at $23.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas BRLXF's P/E ratio is 292.17. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BRLXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to BRLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CGKEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CGKEF trades at $6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CGKEF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CGKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CGKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, INGXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while INGXF trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas INGXF's P/E ratio is 69.71. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to INGXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to INGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TREAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TREAF trades at $13.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TREAF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TREAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TREAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CGKEY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CGKEY trades at $9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CGKEY's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CGKEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CGKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ALRCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ALRCF trades at $27.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ALRCF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALRCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ALRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ENGDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ENGDF trades at $36.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ENGDF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ENGDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ENGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, FSGCY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while FSGCY trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas FSGCY's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FSGCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to FSGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, SEYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while SEYMF trades at $7.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas SEYMF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SEYMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to SEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, VLTAF has a market cap of 903.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while VLTAF trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas VLTAF's P/E ratio is -38.33. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VLTAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to VLTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ERXCF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ERXCF trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ERXCF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ERXCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ERXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, LGSXY has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while LGSXY trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas LGSXY's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LGSXY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to LGSXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CWPWF has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CWPWF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CWPWF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CWPWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CWPWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, OKEPF has a market cap of 353M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while OKEPF trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas OKEPF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OKEPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to OKEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ENLTF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ENLTF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ENLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ENLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to ENLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ATRWF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ATRWF trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ATRWF's P/E ratio is -425.00. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ATRWF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ATRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, SMTLD has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while SMTLD trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas SMTLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMTLD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to SMTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, RAMPF has a market cap of 183M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while RAMPF trades at $8.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas RAMPF's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RAMPF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to RAMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, SVMRF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while SVMRF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas SVMRF's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SVMRF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to SVMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, PHNGF has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while PHNGF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas PHNGF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PHNGF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to PHNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, PVLTF has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while PVLTF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas PVLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PVLTF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to PVLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TDWRF has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TDWRF trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TDWRF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TDWRF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TDWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, SKPGF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while SKPGF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas SKPGF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SKPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to SKPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, GIPIF has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while GIPIF trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas GIPIF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GIPIF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to GIPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, SMTLF has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while SMTLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas SMTLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMTLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to SMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, WEGYF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while WEGYF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas WEGYF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WEGYF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to WEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, SMAYF has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while SMAYF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas SMAYF's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMAYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to SMAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, AZREF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while AZREF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas AZREF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AZREF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to AZREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, WNDW has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while WNDW trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas WNDW's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WNDW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to WNDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CLMOF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CLMOF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CLMOF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CLMOF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CLMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CLNV has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CLNV trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CLNV's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CLNV's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to CLNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CWGYF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CWGYF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CWGYF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CWGYF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to CWGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, PHIXF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while PHIXF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas PHIXF's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to PHIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, RROYF has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while RROYF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas RROYF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RROYF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to RROYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, AZLOF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while AZLOF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas AZLOF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AZLOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to AZLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, AWSL has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while AWSL trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas AWSL's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AWSL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to AWSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, GEBRF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while GEBRF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas GEBRF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GEBRF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to GEBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, SHUNF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while SHUNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas SHUNF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SHUNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to SHUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, MOTNF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while MOTNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas MOTNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MOTNF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to MOTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, FNEC has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while FNEC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas FNEC's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FNEC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to FNEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, PWCO has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while PWCO trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas PWCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PWCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to PWCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, NKWFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while NKWFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas NKWFF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NKWFF's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to NKWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, VGREF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while VGREF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas VGREF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VGREF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to VGREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ASRE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ASRE trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ASRE's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ASRE's ROE of -7.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to ASRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, PRHL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while PRHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas PRHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PRHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to PRHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TNSTF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TNSTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TNSTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TNSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TNSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, VXIT has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while VXIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas VXIT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VXIT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to VXIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ALKHF has a market cap of 966.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ALKHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ALKHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALKHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ALKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, NEVE has a market cap of 746.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while NEVE trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas NEVE's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NEVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to NEVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ENCVF has a market cap of 630.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ENCVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ENCVF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ENCVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ENCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, MMMW has a market cap of 487.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while MMMW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas MMMW's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MMMW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to MMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CPWR has a market cap of 184.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CPWR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CPWR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CPWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, IICN has a market cap of 143.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while IICN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas IICN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IICN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to IICN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, VSPC has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while VSPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas VSPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VSPC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to VSPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, PSPW has a market cap of 82.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while PSPW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas PSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PSPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is less volatile compared to PSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ETRXF has a market cap of 66.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ETRXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ETRXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ETRXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ETRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, GEECF has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while GEECF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas GEECF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GEECF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to GEECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, TPII has a market cap of 37.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while TPII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas TPII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TPII's ROE of -22.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to TPII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ARSC has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ARSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ARSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ARSC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ARSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, QSPW has a market cap of 15.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while QSPW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas QSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to QSPW's ROE of -96.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to QSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, ZHYLF has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while ZHYLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas ZHYLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZHYLF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to ZHYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, VENG has a market cap of 12.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while VENG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas VENG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VENG's ROE of -8.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to VENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, VCII has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while VCII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas VCII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VCII's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to VCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, CGEI has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while CGEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas CGEI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CGEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to CGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.

IESVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IESVF stands at 147.4M. In comparison, NCEN has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, IESVF is priced at $0.33, while NCEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IESVF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.72, whereas NCEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IESVF's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCEN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IESVF is more volatile compared to NCEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESVF.