Interconexión Eléctrica S.A. E.S.P.
Interconexión Eléctrica S.A. E.S.P. IESFY Peers
See (IESFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESFY | $127.28 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 7.77 | $15.50 | +5.97% |
| NGGTF | $15.24 | +0.01% | 71.7B | 18.06 | $0.81 | +4.20% |
| ELEZY | $15.92 | +0.00% | 33.8B | 13.40 | $1.19 | +2.94% |
| ELEZF | $31.02 | +0.00% | 29.1B | 11.65 | $2.36 | +4.63% |
| NSARO | $76.60 | +0.00% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.11% |
| NSARP | $69.00 | -2.82% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.12% |
| CLPHY | $8.47 | +0.00% | 21.6B | 14.46 | $0.59 | +4.44% |
| CLPHF | $8.41 | +0.00% | 21.4B | 14.37 | $0.59 | +4.77% |
| HRNNF | $35.55 | -0.50% | 21.3B | 24.02 | $1.48 | +3.09% |
| TEZNY | $30.84 | +0.00% | 20.7B | 17.30 | $1.79 | +2.77% |
Stock Comparison
IESFY vs NGGTF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while NGGTF trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs ELEZY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while ELEZY trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs ELEZF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while ELEZF trades at $31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and ELEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs NSARO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while NSARO trades at $76.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs NSARP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while NSARP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CLPHY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CLPHY trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs CLPHF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CLPHF trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HRNNF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HRNNF trades at $35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs TEZNY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while TEZNY trades at $30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs TNABY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while TNABY trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and TNABY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs TERRF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while TERRF trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and TERRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs TNABF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while TNABF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and TNABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs AILIO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while AILIO trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and AILIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CKISF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CKISF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CKISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CKISY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CKISY trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CKISY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs EMRAF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while EMRAF trades at $45.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs RDEIY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while RDEIY trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs ELIAF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and ELIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs UEPCO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while UEPCO trades at $97.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and UEPCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs MAEOY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while MAEOY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and MAEOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs EQUEY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while EQUEY trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and EQUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HPIFF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs FTRSF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while FTRSF trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and FTRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs UEPCN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs UEPEP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while UEPEP trades at $73.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and UEPEP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs FORFF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while FORFF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and FORFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs UEPEO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while UEPEO trades at $71.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs UEPCP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while UEPCP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and UEPCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HPIFY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HPIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs EGIEY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while EGIEY trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs UEPEM Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while UEPEM trades at $65.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs UEPEN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while UEPEN trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and UEPEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HKVTY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HKVTY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HKVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HKCVF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CPWIF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CPWIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs ABZPF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while ABZPF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and ABZPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs ABOIF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while ABOIF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and ABOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs WELPM Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs PGPKY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while PGPKY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and PGPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs WELPP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while WELPP trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and WELPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs AILLM Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while AILLM trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs AILLN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while AILLN trades at $76.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs AILIN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while AILIN trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and AILIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs AILLP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while AILLP trades at $65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs RGPCF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and RGPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs FPHHF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CUPUF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 556.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CUPUF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs RELFF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs ABTZY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while ABTZY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CNLPL Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNLPL trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CNLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CNTHP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNTHP trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CNTHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs ABZPY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and ABZPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CNTHO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNTHO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CNTHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CNTHN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNTHN trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CNTHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CNLHP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNLHP trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CNLHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CNLTP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNLTP trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs CNLHO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNLHO trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs CNLPM Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNLPM trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs CNLTN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNLTN trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CNLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CNLHN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNLHN trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and CNLHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs CNLTL Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while CNLTL trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs EDCFF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and EDCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs NZWFF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs SUME Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while SUME trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and SUME have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs EUSP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while EUSP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and EUSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs MCPB Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and MCPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HAWEL Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 774.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HAWEL trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HAWEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HAWLI Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 737.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HAWLI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HAWLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HAWLM Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 725K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HAWLM trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs HAWLN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 725K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HAWLN trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HAWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HAWEM Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 724.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HAWEM trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HAWEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs HAWLL Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 723.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HAWLL trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs HAWEN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 700.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while HAWEN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and HAWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs RIGH Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and RIGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs USWF Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs EPGRQ Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs RENU Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and RENU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs IPWLP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs BANGN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs IPWLG Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs AILIP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while AILIP trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and AILIP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs PNMXO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while PNMXO trades at $75.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and PNMXO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs NMPWP Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while NMPWP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and NMPWP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs IPWLO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs ENIAY Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs EVSO Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IESFY.
IESFY vs NEWEN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while NEWEN trades at $96.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and NEWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IESFY vs IPWLN Comparison
IESFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IESFY stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IESFY is priced at $127.28, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IESFY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IESFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IESFY and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).