Invinity Energy Systems plc
Invinity Energy Systems plc IES.L Peers
See (IES.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IES.L | $13.00 | +1.85% | 57.27M | -1.44 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| 0R3I.L | $100.05 | +0.41% | 11.35B | -20.66 | -$4.84 | N/A |
| DRX.L | $616.00 | +0.33% | 2.19B | 4.56 | $1.35 | +4.22% |
| 0QOH.L | $31.10 | -2.51% | 1.03B | 13.90 | $2.24 | N/A |
| GRP.L | $0.73 | -1.08% | 815.11M | 14.64 | $0.05 | +9.23% |
| 0E9V.L | $43.85 | -5.70% | 634.41M | 17.40 | $2.52 | +2.74% |
| 0EIB.L | $1.06 | N/A | 464.02M | 211.20 | $0.01 | +2.17% |
| 0GHX.L | $4.30 | N/A | 128.65M | -1.60 | -$2.69 | N/A |
| GOOD.L | $489.00 | +0.51% | 90.50M | 19.56 | $0.25 | +0.69% |
| 0QQT.L | $54.00 | +0.93% | 49.55M | 12.41 | $4.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IES.L vs 0R3I.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, 0R3I.L has a market cap of 11.35B. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while 0R3I.L trades at $100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas 0R3I.L's P/E ratio is -20.66. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to 0R3I.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to 0R3I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs DRX.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, DRX.L has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while DRX.L trades at $616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas DRX.L's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DRX.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to DRX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs 0QOH.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, 0QOH.L has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while 0QOH.L trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas 0QOH.L's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to 0QOH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to 0QOH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs GRP.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, GRP.L has a market cap of 815.11M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while GRP.L trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas GRP.L's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GRP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to GRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs 0E9V.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, 0E9V.L has a market cap of 634.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while 0E9V.L trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas 0E9V.L's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to 0E9V.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to 0E9V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs 0EIB.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, 0EIB.L has a market cap of 464.02M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while 0EIB.L trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas 0EIB.L's P/E ratio is 211.20. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to 0EIB.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is less volatile compared to 0EIB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs 0GHX.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, 0GHX.L has a market cap of 128.65M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while 0GHX.L trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas 0GHX.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to 0GHX.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to 0GHX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs GOOD.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, GOOD.L has a market cap of 90.50M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while GOOD.L trades at $489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas GOOD.L's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GOOD.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to GOOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs 0QQT.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, 0QQT.L has a market cap of 49.55M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while 0QQT.L trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas 0QQT.L's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to 0QQT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to 0QQT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs 0QQG.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, 0QQG.L has a market cap of 45.07M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while 0QQG.L trades at $43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas 0QQG.L's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to 0QQG.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to 0QQG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs PHE.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, PHE.L has a market cap of 22.58M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while PHE.L trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas PHE.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PHE.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to PHE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs CPH2.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, CPH2.L has a market cap of 22.15M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while CPH2.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas CPH2.L's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CPH2.L's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is less volatile compared to CPH2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs ATOM.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, ATOM.L has a market cap of 19.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while ATOM.L trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas ATOM.L's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ATOM.L's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is less volatile compared to ATOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs SAE.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, SAE.L has a market cap of 16.62M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while SAE.L trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas SAE.L's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SAE.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is less volatile compared to SAE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs PNPL.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, PNPL.L has a market cap of 2.28M. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while PNPL.L trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas PNPL.L's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PNPL.L's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to PNPL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs MAST.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, MAST.L has a market cap of 980614.00. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while MAST.L trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas MAST.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MAST.L's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is less volatile compared to MAST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs NZI.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, NZI.L has a market cap of 819450.00. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while NZI.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas NZI.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NZI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to NZI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.
IES.L vs CODX.L Comparison
IES.L plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IES.L stands at 57.27M. In comparison, CODX.L has a market cap of 467500.00. Regarding current trading prices, IES.L is priced at $13.00, while CODX.L trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IES.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.44, whereas CODX.L's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, IES.L's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CODX.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IES.L is more volatile compared to CODX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IES.L.