iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF IEML.L Peers
See (IEML.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEML.L | £46.31 | +0.48% | 8B | 1.39 | £33.40 | +5.36% |
| CE31.L | £9,860.00 | +0.39% | 179.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MTXX.L | £4,241.75 | +0.41% | 149.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CE01.L | £13,068.00 | +0.41% | 74.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EHYB.L | £3,368.25 | +0.42% | 19.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.15% |
| IB01.L | £116.34 | +0.02% | 15.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AT1D.L | £1,380.00 | +0.23% | 15.1B | N/A | N/A | +6.51% |
| UB82.L | £2,844.00 | +0.18% | 11.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.04% |
| GBP5.L | £978.60 | +0.31% | 10.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.19% |
| IGBE.L | £3,298.00 | -0.27% | 7.6B | N/A | N/A | +4.79% |
Stock Comparison
IEML.L vs CE31.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, CE31.L has a market cap of 179.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while CE31.L trades at £9,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas CE31.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE31.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to CE31.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs MTXX.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, MTXX.L has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while MTXX.L trades at £4,241.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas MTXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to MTXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs CE01.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, CE01.L has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while CE01.L trades at £13,068.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas CE01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to CE01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs EHYB.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, EHYB.L has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while EHYB.L trades at £3,368.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas EHYB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to EHYB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IB01.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IB01.L has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IB01.L trades at £116.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IB01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IB01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IB01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs AT1D.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, AT1D.L has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while AT1D.L trades at £1,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas AT1D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1D.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to AT1D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs UB82.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, UB82.L has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while UB82.L trades at £2,844.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas UB82.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB82.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to UB82.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GBP5.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GBP5.L has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GBP5.L trades at £978.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GBP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBP5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to GBP5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IGBE.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IGBE.L has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IGBE.L trades at £3,298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IGBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGBE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IGBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GILI.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GILI.L has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GILI.L trades at £13,331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GILI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to GILI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs CBU7.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, CBU7.L has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while CBU7.L trades at £139.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas CBU7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBU7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to CBU7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GLBL.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GLBL.L has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GLBL.L trades at £19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GLBL.L's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLBL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to GLBL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IBTA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IBTA.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IBTA.L trades at £5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IBTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IBTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs SDIA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, SDIA.L has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while SDIA.L trades at £6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas SDIA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to SDIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs SEGA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, SEGA.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while SEGA.L trades at £95.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas SEGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEGA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to SEGA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs SHYG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, SHYG.L has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while SHYG.L trades at £80.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas SHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to SHYG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs CU71.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, CU71.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while CU71.L trades at £10,194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas CU71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to CU71.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GLAD.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GLAD.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GLAD.L trades at £30.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GLAD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to GLAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GLAU.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GLAU.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GLAU.L trades at £30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GLAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to GLAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GLAG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GLAG.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GLAG.L trades at £26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GLAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to GLAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VECA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VECA.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VECA.L trades at £45.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VECA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VECA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VECP.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VECP.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VECP.L trades at £41.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VECP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to VECP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDPA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDPA.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDPA.L trades at £59.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VDPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDCP.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDCP.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDCP.L trades at £47.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDCP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VDCP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IUAA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IUAA.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IUAA.L trades at £5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IUAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to IUAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XBLC.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XBLC.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XBLC.L trades at £160.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XBLC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBLC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XBLC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IE15.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IE15.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IE15.L trades at £108.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IEMB.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IEMB.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IEMB.L trades at £89.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IEMB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs SUOE.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, SUOE.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while SUOE.L trades at £4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas SUOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to SUOE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IDTM.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IDTM.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IDTM.L trades at £173.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IDTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IDTM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VAGS.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VAGS.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VAGS.L trades at £25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VAGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to VAGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VAGP.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VAGP.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VAGP.L trades at £22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VAGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to VAGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XT0D.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XT0D.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XT0D.L trades at £61.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XT0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XT0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs LQDA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, LQDA.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while LQDA.L trades at £6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas LQDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to LQDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs LQDE.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, LQDE.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while LQDE.L trades at £101.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas LQDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to LQDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs ERNE.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, ERNE.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while ERNE.L trades at £100.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas ERNE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to ERNE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs BBIL.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, BBIL.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while BBIL.L trades at £115.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas BBIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to BBIL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XGLE.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XGLE.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XGLE.L trades at £222.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XGLE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGLE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XGLE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GOVG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GOVG.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GOVG.L trades at £4,432.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GOVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to GOVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs SE15.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, SE15.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while SE15.L trades at £93.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas SE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to SE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VETA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VETA.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VETA.L trades at £20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VETA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VETA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VETY.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VETY.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VETY.L trades at £19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VETY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to VETY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VGPA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VGPA.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VGPA.L trades at £48.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VGPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGPA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VGPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VCPA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VCPA.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VCPA.L trades at £43.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VCPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VCPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs ERN1.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, ERN1.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while ERN1.L trades at £86.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas ERN1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERN1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to ERN1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IHYU.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IHYU.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IHYU.L trades at £95.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IHYU.L's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L and IHYU.L have similar daily volatility (0.65).
IEML.L vs FLOA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, FLOA.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while FLOA.L trades at £6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas FLOA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to FLOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs EMGA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, EMGA.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while EMGA.L trades at £5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas EMGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMGA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to EMGA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs SEMB.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, SEMB.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while SEMB.L trades at £6,538.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas SEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to SEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IDBT.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IDBT.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IDBT.L trades at £129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IDBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDBT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IDBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XGGB.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XGGB.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XGGB.L trades at £241.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XGGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to XGGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDTA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDTA.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDTA.L trades at £26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VDTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDTY.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDTY.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDTY.L trades at £21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VDTY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IBTM.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IBTM.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IBTM.L trades at £126.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IBTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IBTM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XGSI.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XGSI.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XGSI.L trades at £13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XGSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XGSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XT01.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XT01.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XT01.L trades at £44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XT01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XT01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs LQDS.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, LQDS.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while LQDS.L trades at £7,432.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas LQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to LQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDCA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDCA.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDCA.L trades at £59.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to VDCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDUC.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDUC.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDUC.L trades at £49.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDUC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDUC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VDUC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IHYA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IHYA.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IHYA.L trades at £7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IHYA.L's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IHYA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs 0GGH.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, 0GGH.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while 0GGH.L trades at £4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas 0GGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to 0GGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs DTLA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, DTLA.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while DTLA.L trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas DTLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to DTLA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IBGX.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IBGX.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IBGX.L trades at £139.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IBGX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IBGX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs SEML.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, SEML.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while SEML.L trades at £33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas SEML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to SEML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IBTS.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IBTS.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IBTS.L trades at £94.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IBTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IBTS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDTS.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDTS.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDTS.L trades at £21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VDTS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VUTY.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VUTY.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VUTY.L trades at £15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VUTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VUTY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XGSG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XGSG.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XGSG.L trades at £2,405.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs MDBG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, MDBG.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while MDBG.L trades at £1,046.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas MDBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to MDBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs AGGG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, AGGG.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while AGGG.L trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas AGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to AGGG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VSCA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VSCA.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VSCA.L trades at £43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VUSC.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VUSC.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VUSC.L trades at £36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VUSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VUSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IBGS.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IBGS.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IBGS.L trades at £122.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IBGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IBGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs CORP.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, CORP.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while CORP.L trades at £90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas CORP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to CORP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XHYG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XHYG.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XHYG.L trades at £16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XHYG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs ERNA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, ERNA.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while ERNA.L trades at £6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas ERNA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to ERNA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs SDIG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, SDIG.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while SDIG.L trades at £100.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas SDIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to SDIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GCVB.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GCVB.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GCVB.L trades at £54.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GCVB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCVB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to GCVB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs ERNS.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, ERNS.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while ERNS.L trades at £100.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas ERNS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to ERNS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs EMSA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, EMSA.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while EMSA.L trades at £5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas EMSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to EMSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs TREX.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, TREX.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while TREX.L trades at £35.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas TREX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TREX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to TREX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IDTL.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IDTL.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IDTL.L trades at £3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IDTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IDTL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs EMCA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, EMCA.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while EMCA.L trades at £6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas EMCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to EMCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XDGU.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XDGU.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XDGU.L trades at £12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XDGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XDGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs EMDL.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, EMDL.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while EMDL.L trades at £43.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas EMDL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMDL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to EMDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs V3GU.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, V3GU.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while V3GU.L trades at £5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas V3GU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3GU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to V3GU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs XZE5.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, XZE5.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while XZE5.L trades at £40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas XZE5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZE5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to XZE5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDEA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDEA.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDEA.L trades at £59.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VDEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VDET.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VDET.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VDET.L trades at £42.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VDET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VDET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IBCI.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IBCI.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IBCI.L trades at £198.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IBCI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IBCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs AT1.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, AT1.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while AT1.L trades at £28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas AT1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to AT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs CRPS.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, CRPS.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while CRPS.L trades at £66.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas CRPS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to CRPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs GLCB.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, GLCB.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while GLCB.L trades at £39.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas GLCB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLCB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to GLCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs VUTA.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, VUTA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while VUTA.L trades at £19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas VUTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to VUTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IGLO.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IGLO.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IGLO.L trades at £92.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IGLO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IUAG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IUAG.L has a market cap of 995.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IUAG.L trades at £93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to IUAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs IBTL.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, IBTL.L has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while IBTL.L trades at £235.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas IBTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to IBTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs TRXG.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, TRXG.L has a market cap of 970.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while TRXG.L trades at £2,604.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas TRXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is more volatile compared to TRXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.
IEML.L vs HYLD.L Comparison
IEML.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEML.L stands at 8B. In comparison, HYLD.L has a market cap of 964.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEML.L is priced at £46.31, while HYLD.L trades at £91.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEML.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.39, whereas HYLD.L's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, IEML.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEML.L is less volatile compared to HYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEML.L.