HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF IE00B4K6B022.SG Peers
See (IE00B4K6B022.SG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IE00B4K6B022.SG | $57.66 | +1.44% | 1.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.67% |
| 0P00000MO4.F | $348.12 | -1.65% | 2.9T | 16.44 | $21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | $301.51 | -1.65% | 2.5T | 16.44 | $18.34 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | $286.98 | +0.92% | 2.4T | 14.32 | $20.04 | N/A |
| FRCJ.DE | $23.53 | +1.23% | 826.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.03% |
| 3SUR.DE | $1,805.20 | +1.21% | 487.9B | N/A | N/A | +1.12% |
| BBN1.F | $119.78 | -0.28% | 145.6B | 41.02 | $2.92 | +3.45% |
| BLQA.DE | $845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | $36.10 | +1.37% |
| ZPDW.DE | $71.54 | +1.56% | 112.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| U1FB.DE | $23.30 | +1.66% | 105.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at $348.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at $301.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at $286.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs FRCJ.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FRCJ.DE has a market cap of 826.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while FRCJ.DE trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRCJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRCJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to FRCJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs 3SUR.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 3SUR.DE has a market cap of 487.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while 3SUR.DE trades at $1,805.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SUR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3SUR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to 3SUR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs BBN1.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while BBN1.F trades at $119.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs BLQA.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while BLQA.DE trades at $845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs ZPDW.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 112.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while ZPDW.DE trades at $71.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs U1FB.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while U1FB.DE trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SXR8.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SXR8.DE trades at $549.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EUNL.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EUNL.DE trades at $98.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs VUSA.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while VUSA.DE trades at $97.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs VUAA.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while VUAA.DE trades at $98.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SXRZ.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SXRZ.DE trades at $233.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XJSE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XJSE.DE trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs VGWL.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while VGWL.DE trades at $126.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs E500.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while E500.DE trades at $45.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs P500.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while P500.DE trades at $1,022.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs D500.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while D500.DE trades at $47.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs VWCE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while VWCE.DE trades at $128.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs VGWL.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while VGWL.F trades at $102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs A4S.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while A4S.DE trades at $275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at $1,021.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SPPE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SPPE.DE trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs AW1Q.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while AW1Q.DE trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IBC3.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IBC3.F trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IS3N.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IS3N.DE trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SPY5.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SPY5.DE trades at $516.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IBC3.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IBC3.DE trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs PPFB.SG Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while PPFB.SG trades at $56.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs LYP2.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while LYP2.DE trades at $290.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs 6TVM.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while 6TVM.DE trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XDWD.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XDWD.DE trades at $108.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs TR1.DU Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while TR1.DU trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XDWL.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XDWL.DE trades at $90.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs LYPS.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while LYPS.DE trades at $53.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IUSA.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IUSA.DE trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IUSZ.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IUSZ.DE trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SXRV.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SXRV.DE trades at $1,066.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IUSQ.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IUSQ.DE trades at $81.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs JUHE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while JUHE.DE trades at $47.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EQQQ.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EQQQ.DE trades at $455.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SPPW.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SPPW.DE trades at $36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XDEE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XDEE.DE trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XDEW.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XDEW.DE trades at $84.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EUN5.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EUN5.DE trades at $120.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SGAS.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SGAS.DE trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs JRUD.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while JRUD.DE trades at $47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs JREU.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while JREU.DE trades at $51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EUNK.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EUNK.DE trades at $86.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs DWS.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while DWS.DE trades at $49.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs QDVE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while QDVE.DE trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs OM3L.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while OM3L.DE trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EGV2.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EGV2.DE trades at $101.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at $33.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while H4ZJ.DE trades at $33.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IQQY.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IQQY.DE trades at $34.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs STXH.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while STXH.DE trades at $141.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs LYYA.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while LYYA.DE trades at $337.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs LYP6.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while LYP6.DE trades at $263.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EXS1.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EXS1.DE trades at $199.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EXIC.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EXIC.DE trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XD9U.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XD9U.DE trades at $151.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XD9E.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XD9E.DE trades at $119.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XD9D.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XD9D.DE trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XS5E.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XS5E.DE trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs D5BM.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while D5BM.DE trades at $102.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EXW1.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EXW1.DE trades at $55.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EXIE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EXIE.DE trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EXSA.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EXSA.DE trades at $55.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at $61.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs VGVF.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while VGVF.DE trades at $101.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs VGVE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while VGVE.DE trades at $97.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IQQW.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IQQW.DE trades at $72.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XWEH.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XWEH.DE trades at $41.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs DBXE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while DBXE.DE trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EDMU.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EDMU.DE trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs VGWD.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while VGWD.DE trades at $64.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs 2B7K.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while 2B7K.DE trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs DBXW.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while DBXW.DE trades at $106.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs LCUW.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while LCUW.DE trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs EXIC.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while EXIC.F trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs DBXD.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while DBXD.DE trades at $225.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs H4ZF.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while H4ZF.DE trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XMME.F Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XMME.F trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs TCC4.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while TCC4.DE trades at $223.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs DECR.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while DECR.DE trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IBCF.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IBCF.DE trades at $122.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs DBXU.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while DBXU.DE trades at $173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XZMU.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XZMU.DE trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs H1D5.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while H1D5.DE trades at $141.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs AUM5.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while AUM5.DE trades at $101.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XIEE.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XIEE.DE trades at $78.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SPP1.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SPP1.DE trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs XMME.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while XMME.DE trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs AEMD.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AEMD.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while AEMD.DE trades at $51.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEMD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEMD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to AEMD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.
IE00B4K6B022.SG vs SC0J.DE Comparison
IE00B4K6B022.SG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE00B4K6B022.SG stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE00B4K6B022.SG is priced at $57.66, while SC0J.DE trades at $106.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE00B4K6B022.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE00B4K6B022.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE00B4K6B022.SG is more volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE00B4K6B022.SG.