Integrated Cyber Solutions Inc
Integrated Cyber Solutions Inc (ICS.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICS.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICS.CN | CA$0.22 | -6.38% | 13.6M | -7.33 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| MSFT.NE | CA$38.41 | +3.95% | 5.7T | 39.62 | CA$0.97 | +0.60% |
| PANW.NE | CA$20.90 | -5.26% | 166.9B | 99.52 | CA$0.21 | N/A |
| NVEI.TO | CA$47.61 | N/A | 6.8B | 216.41 | CA$0.22 | +0.58% |
| BB.TO | CA$5.10 | -1.35% | 3B | 170.00 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| TIXT.TO | CA$5.23 | -1.88% | 1.5B | -7.92 | -CA$0.66 | N/A |
| CPLF.TO | CA$11.99 | +0.08% | 943.5M | -49.96 | -CA$0.24 | N/A |
| CVO.TO | CA$9.02 | +0.67% | 882.8M | -47.47 | -CA$0.19 | N/A |
| DND.TO | CA$11.19 | -3.37% | 752.2M | -4.59 | -CA$2.44 | +0.65% |
| TC.TO | CA$23.94 | -6.88% | 264.7M | -1.94 | -CA$12.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ICS.CN vs MSFT.NE Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while MSFT.NE trades at CA$38.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 39.62. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check MSFT.NE's competition here
ICS.CN vs PANW.NE Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 166.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while PANW.NE trades at CA$20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 99.52. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PANW.NE's competition here
ICS.CN vs NVEI.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while NVEI.TO trades at CA$47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check NVEI.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs BB.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, BB.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while BB.TO trades at CA$5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas BB.TO's P/E ratio is 170.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to BB.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to BB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check BB.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs TIXT.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while TIXT.TO trades at CA$5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check TIXT.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs CPLF.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while CPLF.TO trades at CA$11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check CPLF.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs CVO.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 882.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while CVO.TO trades at CA$9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -47.47. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check CVO.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs DND.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 752.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while DND.TO trades at CA$11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check DND.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs TC.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 264.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while TC.TO trades at CA$23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check TC.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs STC.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 263M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while STC.TO trades at CA$7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -27.07. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check STC.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs PAY.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while PAY.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PAY.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs GIVX.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while GIVX.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check GIVX.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs HAI.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while HAI.TO trades at CA$4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is -124.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check HAI.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs RAIL.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while RAIL.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -8.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check RAIL.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs NC.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while NC.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check NC.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs MOGO.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while MOGO.TO trades at CA$2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check MOGO.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs BVCI.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check BVCI.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs SCPE.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while SCPE.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check SCPE.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs PACT.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while PACT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PACT.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs HANK.V Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while HANK.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check HANK.V's competition here
ICS.CN vs EONX.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while EONX.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check EONX.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs CYBT.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while CYBT.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check CYBT.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs IP.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while IP.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check IP.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs NFTX.NE Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while NFTX.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +52.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check NFTX.NE's competition here
ICS.CN vs VPN.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, VPN.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while VPN.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas VPN.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to VPN.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is less volatile compared to VPN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check VPN.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs PKK.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while PKK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PKK.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs PERK.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while PERK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PERK.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs OPT.TO Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while OPT.TO trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check OPT.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs SCYB.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while SCYB.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check SCYB.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs MBLM.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while MBLM.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check MBLM.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs DSAI.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while DSAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check DSAI.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs HRO.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while HRO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check HRO.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs APP.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while APP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check APP.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs BYND.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while BYND.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check BYND.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs AMPD.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while AMPD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check AMPD.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs SQID.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while SQID.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check SQID.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs TAAL.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, TAAL.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while TAAL.CN trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ICS.CN has daily volatility of 9.09 and TAAL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check TAAL.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs EAP.CN Comparison August 2025
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 13.6M. In comparison, EAP.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.22, while EAP.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.33, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ICS.CN has daily volatility of 9.09 and EAP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check EAP.CN's competition here