Integrated Cyber Solutions Inc
Integrated Cyber Solutions Inc (ICS.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICS.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICS.CN | CA$0.55 | -8.33% | 34.7M | -7.86 | -CA$0.07 | N/A |
| MSFT.NE | CA$26.12 | -0.11% | 3.8T | 26.93 | CA$0.97 | +0.95% |
| PLTR.NE | CA$11.18 | +0.27% | 484.4B | 372.67 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| PANW.NE | CA$19.02 | +0.21% | 149.5B | 100.11 | CA$0.19 | N/A |
| NVEI.TO | CA$47.61 | N/A | 6.8B | 216.41 | CA$0.22 | +0.86% |
| BB.TO | CA$4.68 | +3.77% | 2.8B | 78.00 | CA$0.06 | N/A |
| TIXT.TO | CA$6.07 | +2.36% | 1.7B | -3.11 | -CA$1.95 | N/A |
| CPLF.TO | CA$11.99 | +0.08% | 943.5M | -49.96 | -CA$0.24 | N/A |
| BTQ.NE | CA$3.63 | -1.89% | 508.3M | -33.00 | -CA$0.11 | N/A |
| CVO.TO | CA$4.30 | +1.65% | 412.3M | -8.78 | -CA$0.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ICS.CN vs MSFT.NE Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while MSFT.NE trades at CA$26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check MSFT.NE's competition here
ICS.CN vs PLTR.NE Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, PLTR.NE has a market cap of 484.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while PLTR.NE trades at CA$11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PLTR.NE's P/E ratio is 372.67. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to PLTR.NE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PLTR.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PLTR.NE's competition here
ICS.CN vs PANW.NE Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 149.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while PANW.NE trades at CA$19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 100.11. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PANW.NE's competition here
ICS.CN vs NVEI.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while NVEI.TO trades at CA$47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check NVEI.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs BB.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, BB.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while BB.TO trades at CA$4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas BB.TO's P/E ratio is 78.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to BB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to BB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check BB.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs TIXT.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while TIXT.TO trades at CA$6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check TIXT.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs CPLF.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while CPLF.TO trades at CA$11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check CPLF.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs BTQ.NE Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, BTQ.NE has a market cap of 508.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while BTQ.NE trades at CA$3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas BTQ.NE's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to BTQ.NE's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is less volatile compared to BTQ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check BTQ.NE's competition here
ICS.CN vs CVO.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 412.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while CVO.TO trades at CA$4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check CVO.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs TC.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 268.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while TC.TO trades at CA$24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check TC.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs DND.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 262M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while DND.TO trades at CA$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check DND.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs HAI.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 212.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while HAI.TO trades at CA$7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is 258.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check HAI.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs PAY.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while PAY.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PAY.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs GIVX.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while GIVX.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check GIVX.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs STC.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while STC.TO trades at CA$5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check STC.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs NC.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while NC.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +41.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check NC.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs RAIL.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while RAIL.CN trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check RAIL.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs EONX.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while EONX.CN trades at CA$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check EONX.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs MOGO.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while MOGO.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check MOGO.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs ORIO.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, ORIO.TO has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while ORIO.TO trades at CA$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ORIO.TO's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to ORIO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to ORIO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check ORIO.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs SCPE.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while SCPE.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -7.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check SCPE.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs SCYB.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while SCYB.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check SCYB.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs CYBT.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while CYBT.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check CYBT.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs FTRC.V Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, FTRC.V has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while FTRC.V trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas FTRC.V's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to FTRC.V's ROE of +15.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to FTRC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check FTRC.V's competition here
ICS.CN vs PACT.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while PACT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -46.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PACT.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs BVCI.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is less volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check BVCI.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs HANK.V Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while HANK.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check HANK.V's competition here
ICS.CN vs ENCR.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, ENCR.CN has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while ENCR.CN trades at CA$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ENCR.CN's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to ENCR.CN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to ENCR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check ENCR.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs NFTX.NE Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while NFTX.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +40.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check NFTX.NE's competition here
ICS.CN vs VPN.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VPN.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while VPN.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas VPN.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to VPN.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is less volatile compared to VPN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check VPN.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs PKK.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while PKK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PKK.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs APP.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while APP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check APP.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs PERK.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while PERK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check PERK.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs MBLM.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while MBLM.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check MBLM.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs IP.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while IP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check IP.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs DSAI.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while DSAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check DSAI.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs HRO.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while HRO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check HRO.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs OPT.TO Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while OPT.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check OPT.TO's competition here
ICS.CN vs BYND.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while BYND.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check BYND.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs AMPD.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while AMPD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check AMPD.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs SQID.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while SQID.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICS.CN is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICS.CN.Check SQID.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs TAAL.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, TAAL.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while TAAL.CN trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ICS.CN has daily volatility of 11.97 and TAAL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check TAAL.CN's competition here
ICS.CN vs EAP.CN Comparison April 2026
ICS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICS.CN stands at 34.7M. In comparison, EAP.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICS.CN is priced at CA$0.55, while EAP.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, ICS.CN's ROE is +2.48%, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ICS.CN has daily volatility of 11.97 and EAP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check EAP.CN's competition here