Iconic Labs Plc
Iconic Labs Plc ICON.L Peers
See (ICON.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICON.L | £2.50 | -9.09% | 381.8K | -0.62 | -£0.04 | N/A |
| WPP.L | £516.20 | +1.98% | 5.6B | 10.53 | £0.49 | +6.42% |
| ASCL.L | £567.50 | +0.09% | 1.2B | 47.29 | £0.12 | N/A |
| FOUR.L | £3,725.00 | +3.04% | 1B | 12.21 | £3.05 | +4.57% |
| NFC.L | £799.00 | -3.03% | 787M | -9.74 | -£0.82 | N/A |
| YOU.L | £374.50 | +4.61% | 438.5M | 374.50 | £0.01 | +2.40% |
| TRMR.L | £201.20 | +1.82% | 293.1M | -18.29 | -£0.11 | N/A |
| NEXN.L | £403.00 | +4.00% | 257.2M | 28.79 | £0.14 | N/A |
| NFG.L | £240.00 | +15.38% | 242.2M | 6.32 | £0.38 | +6.40% |
| 0N7I.L | £1.80 | +0.00% | 241.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ICON.L vs WPP.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, WPP.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while WPP.L trades at £516.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas WPP.L's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPP.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to WPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs ASCL.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, ASCL.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while ASCL.L trades at £567.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas ASCL.L's P/E ratio is 47.29. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASCL.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to ASCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs FOUR.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, FOUR.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while FOUR.L trades at £3,725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas FOUR.L's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOUR.L's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to FOUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs NFC.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, NFC.L has a market cap of 787M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while NFC.L trades at £799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NFC.L's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NFC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to NFC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs YOU.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, YOU.L has a market cap of 438.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while YOU.L trades at £374.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas YOU.L's P/E ratio is 374.50. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YOU.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to YOU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs TRMR.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, TRMR.L has a market cap of 293.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while TRMR.L trades at £201.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TRMR.L's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRMR.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to TRMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs NEXN.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, NEXN.L has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while NEXN.L trades at £403.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NEXN.L's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEXN.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to NEXN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs NFG.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, NFG.L has a market cap of 242.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while NFG.L trades at £240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NFG.L's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NFG.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to NFG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs 0N7I.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, 0N7I.L has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while 0N7I.L trades at £1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas 0N7I.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0N7I.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to 0N7I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs SAA.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, SAA.L has a market cap of 229.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while SAA.L trades at £189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SAA.L's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAA.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to SAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs SFOR.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, SFOR.L has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while SFOR.L trades at £26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SFOR.L's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFOR.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to SFOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs PEBB.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, PEBB.L has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while PEBB.L trades at £50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas PEBB.L's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEBB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to PEBB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs SYS1.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, SYS1.L has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while SYS1.L trades at £425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SYS1.L's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYS1.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to SYS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs CAU.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, CAU.L has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while CAU.L trades at £32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas CAU.L's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAU.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to CAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs EBQ.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, EBQ.L has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while EBQ.L trades at £23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas EBQ.L's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EBQ.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to EBQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs TMG.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, TMG.L has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while TMG.L trades at £25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas TMG.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to TMG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs NAH.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, NAH.L has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while NAH.L trades at £42.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas NAH.L's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAH.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to NAH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs DNM.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, DNM.L has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while DNM.L trades at £26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas DNM.L's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNM.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to DNM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs SBDS.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, SBDS.L has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while SBDS.L trades at £29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SBDS.L's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBDS.L's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to SBDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs SAL.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, SAL.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while SAL.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas SAL.L's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAL.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to SAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs MIRI.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, MIRI.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while MIRI.L trades at £0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MIRI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIRI.L's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to MIRI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs MDZ.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, MDZ.L has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while MDZ.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas MDZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDZ.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to MDZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs GVMH.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, GVMH.L has a market cap of 938.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while GVMH.L trades at £0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas GVMH.L's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GVMH.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to GVMH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs JWNG.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, JWNG.L has a market cap of 396.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while JWNG.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas JWNG.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JWNG.L's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to JWNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.
ICON.L vs OOUT.L Comparison
ICON.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON.L stands at 381.8K. In comparison, OOUT.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICON.L is priced at £2.50, while OOUT.L trades at £10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.62, whereas OOUT.L's P/E ratio is -15.09. In terms of profitability, ICON.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OOUT.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON.L is more volatile compared to OOUT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.L.