Icon Energy Limited

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while WOPEF trades at $15.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PEXNY trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, RGRLF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while RGRLF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGRLF's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RGRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to RGRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while TRMLF trades at $47.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while DETNF trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while IPXHY trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while SSLZY trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while STOSF trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while IPXHF trades at $13.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while AETUF trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while SPGYF trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PTRRY trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while DKDRF trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while MEGEF trades at $18.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while VSOGF trades at $47.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PREKF trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PMOIF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while DLKGF trades at $210.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while HBRIY trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -26.30. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while DELKY trades at $20.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while OASPW trades at $55.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PEYUF trades at $13.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while EERGF trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PRMRF trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while NUVSF trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while ATHOF trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while BCHEY trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while BEPTF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while IPCFF trades at $16.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while JPTXF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while FRHLF trades at $9.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while BIREF trades at $5.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while AAVVF trades at $8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -65.69. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while DTNOF trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while CDDRF trades at $4.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while KELTF trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while KRNGF trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PARXF trades at $10.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PQEFF has a market cap of 974.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PQEFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PQEFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PQEFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PQEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 884.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while SQZZF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 826.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while AOIFF trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 794.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while CRLFF trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 774.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while BWEFF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 658.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while KWTEF trades at $15.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 562.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while DALXF trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while SHASF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 488.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while GUKYF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 462.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PTALF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 445.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while ZPTAF trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while RCKHF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 403.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while ATUUF trades at $14.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -44.52. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PTHRF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -33.84. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while FECCF trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while COPJF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 359.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while KRNGY trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 334.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while CEIEF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -31.46. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while OILSF trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 283.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while TUWLF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PESAF trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while TUWOY trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while EXCE trades at $11.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 220.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while ZNOG trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -20.02. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while GEGYF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while EEGUF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while SEUSF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while IPOOF trades at $6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while GASXF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PIFYF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while RECWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while HZNFF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 161.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while ALVOF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while LNDNF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while SVNNF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to SVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.

ICNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICNOF stands at 3M. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICNOF is priced at $0.00, while RUBLF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICNOF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, ICNOF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICNOF is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICNOF.