GreenFirst Forest Products Inc.
GreenFirst Forest Products Inc. ICLTF Peers
See (ICLTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLTF | $2.70 | +0.00% | 61M | -3.14 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| KLBAY | $6.72 | +0.01% | 22.2B | 66.27 | $0.11 | +6.15% |
| UPMMY | $28.43 | +4.12% | 14.3B | 40.48 | $0.67 | +6.37% |
| UPMKF | $27.83 | +0.00% | 14.1B | 40.44 | $0.66 | +5.82% |
| SEOJF | $8.56 | +0.00% | 10.8B | -90.93 | -$0.15 | +1.89% |
| SVCBF | $13.35 | +0.04% | 9.6B | 24.76 | $0.55 | +2.20% |
| SEOAY | $10.82 | +0.00% | 8.6B | -72.27 | -$0.15 | +2.26% |
| SCABY | $14.30 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 23.73 | $0.55 | +2.26% |
| MONDF | $18.53 | +5.14% | 8.2B | 9.70 | $1.91 | N/A |
| MONDY | $33.56 | +1.94% | 7.5B | 29.64 | $1.13 | +4.96% |
Stock Comparison
ICLTF vs KLBAY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while KLBAY trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 66.27. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is less volatile compared to KLBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs UPMMY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while UPMMY trades at $28.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 40.48. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs UPMKF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while UPMKF trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to UPMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs SEOJF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while SEOJF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is -90.93. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs SVCBF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while SVCBF trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to SVCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs SEOAY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while SEOAY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is -72.27. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is less volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs SCABY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while SCABY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to SCABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs MONDF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while MONDF trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MONDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to MONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs MONDY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while MONDY trades at $33.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs HLMNY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, HLMNY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while HLMNY trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas HLMNY's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HLMNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to HLMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs OJIPF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while OJIPF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to OJIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs OJIPY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while OJIPY trades at $48.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to OJIPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs POELF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while POELF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to POELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs STLJF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while STLJF trades at $56.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs BLRDF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while BLRDF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to BLRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs NDGPY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while NDGPY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to NDGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs PIKQF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while PIKQF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to PIKQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs NDGPF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while NDGPF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to NDGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs LMPMF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while LMPMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to LMPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs CFPZF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while CFPZF trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs LMPMY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while LMPMY trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to LMPMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs SPPJY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while SPPJY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to SPPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs NIJPF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 811.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while NIJPF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to NIJPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs TKFTF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to TKFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs IFSPF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 481.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while IFSPF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs PKNOF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 319.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while PKNOF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to PKNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs ACAZF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while ACAZF trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs RTTNY Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to RTTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs ACSYF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while ACSYF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to ACSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs RTERF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while RTERF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RTERF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to RTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs WFSTF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while WFSTF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to WFSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs GFELF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while GFELF trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to GFELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs KEWL Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while KEWL trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to KEWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs CFPUF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while CFPUF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to CFPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs RUBNF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while RUBNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to RUBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs BRGSF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to BRGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs TCOR Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while TCOR trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to TCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs SUPBF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to SUPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs CFXTF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while CFXTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to CFXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs WBNEF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs SGTM Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while SGTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs HMTC Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while HMTC trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to HMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs BSTO Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while BSTO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to BSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs BMSPF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 655.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to BMSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs SGMD Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while SGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to SGMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs EXRG Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while EXRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EXRG's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs ZMGD Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs BPMI Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while BPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to BPMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs HAIPF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, HAIPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to HAIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs KPCM Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, KPCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while KPCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to KPCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.
ICLTF vs VRDSF Comparison
ICLTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICLTF stands at 61M. In comparison, VRDSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICLTF is priced at $2.70, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.14, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICLTF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICLTF is more volatile compared to VRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICLTF.