ICBS, Ltd.
ICBS, Ltd. (ICBT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICBT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICBT | $0.00 | +900.00% | 885.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HTHIF | $31.64 | +4.41% | 144.9B | 36.36 | $0.87 | +0.95% |
| MTSUY | $19.98 | -2.68% | 79.6B | 12.42 | $1.61 | +2.74% |
| MSBHF | $19.80 | -3.56% | 79B | 12.33 | $1.61 | +3.39% |
| ITOCY | $104.97 | -1.80% | 74.6B | 12.49 | $8.41 | N/A |
| ITOCF | $54.35 | +1.64% | 73.5B | 12.35 | $4.20 | +2.62% |
| HTHIY | $29.85 | -4.48% | 68.4B | 34.29 | $0.87 | +0.70% |
| MITSF | $20.50 | -5.98% | 60B | 9.99 | $2.09 | +3.25% |
| MITSY | $413.37 | -3.06% | 59.7B | 9.89 | $41.87 | +2.31% |
| CTPCY | $7.00 | +7.03% | 40.7B | 5.07 | $1.38 | +5.21% |
Stock Comparison
ICBT vs HTHIF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while HTHIF trades at $31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check HTHIF's competition here
ICBT vs MTSUY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MTSUY trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MTSUY's competition here
ICBT vs MSBHF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MSBHF trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MSBHF's competition here
ICBT vs ITOCY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while ITOCY trades at $104.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check ITOCY's competition here
ICBT vs ITOCF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while ITOCF trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check ITOCF's competition here
ICBT vs HTHIY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while HTHIY trades at $29.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check HTHIY's competition here
ICBT vs MITSF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MITSF trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MITSF's competition here
ICBT vs MITSY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MITSY trades at $413.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MITSY's competition here
ICBT vs CTPCY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while CTPCY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check CTPCY's competition here
ICBT vs CTPCF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while CTPCF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check CTPCF's competition here
ICBT vs MARUF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MARUF trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MARUF's competition here
ICBT vs MARUY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MARUY trades at $204.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MARUY's competition here
ICBT vs SSUMF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SSUMF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SSUMF's competition here
ICBT vs SSUMY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SSUMY trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SSUMY's competition here
ICBT vs CKHUF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while CKHUF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check CKHUF's competition here
ICBT vs CKHUY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while CKHUY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check CKHUY's competition here
ICBT vs SEIBF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SEIBF trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 62.67. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SEIBF's competition here
ICBT vs TYHOF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check TYHOF's competition here
ICBT vs PITAF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while PITAF trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check PITAF's competition here
ICBT vs JMHLY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while JMHLY trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -34.95. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check JMHLY's competition here
ICBT vs GPOVF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while GPOVF trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check GPOVF's competition here
ICBT vs HLMAF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while HLMAF trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 41.01. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check HLMAF's competition here
ICBT vs HALMY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while HALMY trades at $86.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check HALMY's competition here
ICBT vs JARLF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while JARLF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -34.22. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check JARLF's competition here
ICBT vs GPOVY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check GPOVY's competition here
ICBT vs SWRBF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SWRBF trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SWRBF's competition here
ICBT vs SWRAY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SWRAY trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SWRAY's competition here
ICBT vs KPELY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KPELY trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KPELY's competition here
ICBT vs SWRAF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SWRAF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SWRAF's competition here
ICBT vs KHOLY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KHOLY trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -145.18. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KHOLY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KHOLY's competition here
ICBT vs KPELF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KPELF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KPELF's competition here
ICBT vs MYTHY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MYTHY trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MYTHY's competition here
ICBT vs SCRPF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SCRPF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SCRPF's competition here
ICBT vs SCVPF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SCVPF's competition here
ICBT vs SKSUY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SKSUY trades at $85.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SKSUY's competition here
ICBT vs AYALY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while AYALY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check AYALY's competition here
ICBT vs JGSHF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while JGSHF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check JGSHF's competition here
ICBT vs FCODF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while FCODF trades at $1,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 104.66. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check FCODF's competition here
ICBT vs HYUHF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check HYUHF's competition here
ICBT vs AYYLF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while AYYLF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check AYYLF's competition here
ICBT vs FOSUY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while FOSUY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check FOSUY's competition here
ICBT vs MYTHF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MYTHF trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MYTHF's competition here
ICBT vs AKAAF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while AKAAF trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check AKAAF's competition here
ICBT vs FOSUF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while FOSUF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check FOSUF's competition here
ICBT vs BDVSY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while BDVSY trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check BDVSY's competition here
ICBT vs SZHFF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SZHFF's competition here
ICBT vs KHEXF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KHEXF's competition here
ICBT vs BDVSF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while BDVSF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check BDVSF's competition here
ICBT vs ALFFF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while ALFFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check ALFFF's competition here
ICBT vs BJINF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while BJINF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check BJINF's competition here
ICBT vs KTERF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KTERF trades at $35.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 47.45. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KTERF's competition here
ICBT vs KINUF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KINUF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KINUF's competition here
ICBT vs SMGBF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SMGBF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SMGBF's competition here
ICBT vs KBDCY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KBDCY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KBDCY's competition here
ICBT vs GULRF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while GULRF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check GULRF's competition here
ICBT vs BLJZY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check BLJZY's competition here
ICBT vs KBDCF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KBDCF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KBDCF's competition here
ICBT vs GULRY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while GULRY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check GULRY's competition here
ICBT vs IWTNF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check IWTNF's competition here
ICBT vs SWRBY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SWRBY's competition here
ICBT vs MMSMY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MMSMY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MMSMY's competition here
ICBT vs TINLF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check TINLF's competition here
ICBT vs XZJCF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while XZJCF trades at $31.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -25.04. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check XZJCF's competition here
ICBT vs NARRF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while NARRF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check NARRF's competition here
ICBT vs TINLY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while TINLY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check TINLY's competition here
ICBT vs SGHIF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SGHIF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SGHIF's competition here
ICBT vs NLTBF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while NLTBF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check NLTBF's competition here
ICBT vs SGHIY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SGHIY's competition here
ICBT vs CHCLY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while CHCLY trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check CHCLY's competition here
ICBT vs ALGGF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while ALGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check ALGGF's competition here
ICBT vs NICFF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check NICFF's competition here
ICBT vs MPCFF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MPCFF's competition here
ICBT vs ALGGY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while ALGGY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check ALGGY's competition here
ICBT vs NSHBY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while NSHBY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check NSHBY's competition here
ICBT vs GRGCF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while GRGCF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check GRGCF's competition here
ICBT vs BRYAF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 890.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while BRYAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check BRYAF's competition here
ICBT vs BNHUF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 829.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while BNHUF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check BNHUF's competition here
ICBT vs SHMWF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 793.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SHMWF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SHMWF's competition here
ICBT vs KKRAF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check KKRAF's competition here
ICBT vs MTLZF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while MTLZF trades at $1,203.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check MTLZF's competition here
ICBT vs INDHF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 532.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while INDHF trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check INDHF's competition here
ICBT vs SBOX Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SBOX's competition here
ICBT vs CVVIF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check CVVIF's competition here
ICBT vs BEVFF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 369.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while BEVFF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check BEVFF's competition here
ICBT vs THAFF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while THAFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check THAFF's competition here
ICBT vs CEEIF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check CEEIF's competition here
ICBT vs TJSCF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check TJSCF's competition here
ICBT vs YMAIF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while YMAIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check YMAIF's competition here
ICBT vs HGRVF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while HGRVF trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check HGRVF's competition here
ICBT vs DMCHY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check DMCHY's competition here
ICBT vs JGSMY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while JGSMY trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check JGSMY's competition here
ICBT vs NOBGF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check NOBGF's competition here
ICBT vs APTL Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while APTL trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check APTL's competition here
ICBT vs RSDEF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check RSDEF's competition here
ICBT vs ECSL Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check ECSL's competition here
ICBT vs GTII Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while GTII trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check GTII's competition here
ICBT vs CIBY Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while CIBY trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -122.50. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check CIBY's competition here
ICBT vs SUNTF Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, SUNTF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while SUNTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNTF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to SUNTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to SUNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check SUNTF's competition here
ICBT vs PRTT Comparison July 2025
ICBT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICBT stands at 885.7M. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICBT is priced at $0.00, while PRTT trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICBT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, ICBT's ROE is N/A, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICBT is more volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICBT.Check PRTT's competition here