International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A.
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. ICAGY Peers
See (ICAGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICAGY | $9.34 | -0.21% | 21.8B | 6.85 | $1.36 | +1.48% |
| ANYYY | $13.34 | +1.22% | 200.1B | 88.93 | $0.15 | +8.26% |
| AFLYY | $1.21 | +3.42% | 31.5B | 5.71 | $0.21 | N/A |
| RYAOF | $27.50 | +0.00% | 29.2B | 17.97 | $1.53 | +1.54% |
| BABWF | $4.70 | +0.00% | 22B | 6.91 | $0.68 | +2.16% |
| AIRYY | $15.00 | +11.94% | 18.8B | -250.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| AIPUF | $1.31 | +0.00% | 18.7B | 32.80 | $0.04 | +0.04% |
| SINGY | $11.04 | +0.94% | 16.4B | 8.30 | $1.33 | +6.66% |
| SINGF | $5.24 | +0.00% | 15.7B | 7.94 | $0.66 | +6.86% |
| AICAF | $0.63 | +0.00% | 15.5B | -63.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ICAGY vs ANYYY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ANYYY has a market cap of 200.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ANYYY trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ANYYY's P/E ratio is 88.93. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ANYYY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ANYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AFLYY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AFLYY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AFLYY trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AFLYY's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AFLYY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to AFLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs RYAOF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, RYAOF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while RYAOF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas RYAOF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to RYAOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to RYAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs BABWF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, BABWF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while BABWF trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas BABWF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BABWF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to BABWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AIRYY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AIRYY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AIRYY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AIRYY's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AIRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AIRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AIPUF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AIPUF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AIPUF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AIPUF's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AIPUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to AIPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs SINGY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SINGY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while SINGY trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas SINGY's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SINGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to SINGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs SINGF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SINGF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while SINGF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas SINGF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SINGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to SINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AICAF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AICAF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AICAF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AICAF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AICAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AICAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AIPUY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AIPUY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AIPUY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AIPUY's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AIPUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AIPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs APTPF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, APTPF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while APTPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas APTPF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to APTPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to APTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ARRPY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ARRPY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ARRPY trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ARRPY's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ARRPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ARRPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AEOXF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AEOXF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AEOXF trades at $131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AEOXF's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AEOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AEOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs GPAEF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GPAEF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while GPAEF trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas GPAEF's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GPAEF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to GPAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CHEAF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CHEAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CHEAF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CHEAF's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CHEAF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CHEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs QABSY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, QABSY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while QABSY trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas QABSY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to QABSY's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to QABSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs DLAKY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, DLAKY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while DLAKY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas DLAKY's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DLAKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to DLAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ASRMF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ASRMF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ASRMF trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ASRMF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ASRMF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ASRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs DLAKF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, DLAKF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while DLAKF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas DLAKF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DLAKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to DLAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CPCAF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CPCAF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CPCAF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CPCAF's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CPCAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CPCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ALNPY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ALNPY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ALNPY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ALNPY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ALNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ALNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CHKIF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CHKIF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CHKIF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CHKIF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CHKIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CHKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs QUBSF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, QUBSF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while QUBSF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas QUBSF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to QUBSF's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to QUBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs JAPSY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, JAPSY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while JAPSY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas JAPSY's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JAPSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to JAPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CPCAY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CPCAY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CPCAY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CPCAY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CPCAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CPCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ALNPF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ALNPF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ALNPF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ALNPF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ALNPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ALNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs UZAPF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, UZAPF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while UZAPF trades at $288.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas UZAPF's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to UZAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to UZAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs TKHVY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, TKHVY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while TKHVY trades at $64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas TKHVY's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TKHVY's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to TKHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs FLGZY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FLGZY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while FLGZY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas FLGZY's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FLGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to FLGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ACKDF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ACKDF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ACKDF trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ACKDF's P/E ratio is 166.33. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ACKDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ACKDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs JPNRF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, JPNRF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while JPNRF trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas JPNRF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JPNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to JPNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AUKNY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AUKNY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AUKNY trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AUKNY's P/E ratio is 171.16. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AUKNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AUKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs FPRUY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FPRUY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while FPRUY trades at $37.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas FPRUY's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FPRUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to FPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs FPRUF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FPRUF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while FPRUF trades at $65.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas FPRUF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FPRUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to FPRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ACDVF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ACDVF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ACDVF trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ACDVF's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ACDVF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ACDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ESYJY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ESYJY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ESYJY trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ESYJY's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ESYJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ESYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs EJTTF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, EJTTF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while EJTTF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas EJTTF's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to EJTTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to EJTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ANNSF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ANNSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ANNSF trades at $33.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ANNSF's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ANNSF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ANNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs GAERF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GAERF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while GAERF trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas GAERF's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GAERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to GAERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs FGWLF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FGWLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while FGWLF trades at $56.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas FGWLF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FGWLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to FGWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ELALF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ELALF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ELALF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ELALF's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ELALF's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ELALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AFRAF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AFRAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AFRAF trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AFRAF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AFRAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AFRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs SEGSF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SEGSF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while SEGSF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas SEGSF's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SEGSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to SEGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs SPASF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SPASF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while SPASF trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas SPASF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SPASF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to SPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs JAIRF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, JAIRF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while JAIRF trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas JAIRF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JAIRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to JAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs JTTRY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, JTTRY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while JTTRY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas JTTRY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JTTRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to JTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs TAVHY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, TAVHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while TAVHY trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas TAVHY's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TAVHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to TAVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs EIFZF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, EIFZF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while EIFZF trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas EIFZF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to EIFZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to EIFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs BJCHY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, BJCHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while BJCHY trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas BJCHY's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BJCHY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to BJCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs BJCHF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, BJCHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while BJCHF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas BJCHF's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BJCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to BJCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs WZZZY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, WZZZY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while WZZZY trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas WZZZY's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WZZZY's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to WZZZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs WZZAF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, WZZAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while WZZAF trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas WZZAF's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WZZAF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to WZZAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs NWARF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NWARF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while NWARF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas NWARF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NWARF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to NWARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AGZNF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AGZNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AGZNF trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AGZNF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AGZNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AGZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs GRPAF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GRPAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while GRPAF trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas GRPAF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GRPAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to GRPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ANZLY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ANZLY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ANZLY trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ANZLY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ANZLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ANZLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ANZFF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ANZFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ANZFF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ANZFF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ANZFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ANZFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs AIABF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AIABF has a market cap of 650.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while AIABF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas AIABF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AIABF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to AIABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs FNNNF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FNNNF has a market cap of 629.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while FNNNF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas FNNNF's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FNNNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to FNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs HMCTF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, HMCTF has a market cap of 624.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while HMCTF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas HMCTF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HMCTF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to HMCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CTTPY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CTTPY has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CTTPY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CTTPY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CTTPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CTTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CHRRF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CHRRF has a market cap of 405.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CHRRF trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CHRRF's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CHRRF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CHRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs NOKFF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NOKFF has a market cap of 354.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while NOKFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas NOKFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NOKFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to NOKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs TAWNF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, TAWNF has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while TAWNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas TAWNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TAWNF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to TAWNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs NRSAF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NRSAF has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while NRSAF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas NRSAF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NRSAF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to NRSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs GOLLQ Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GOLLQ has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while GOLLQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas GOLLQ's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GOLLQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to GOLLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CEBUY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CEBUY has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CEBUY trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CEBUY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CEBUY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CEBUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs JETMF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, JETMF has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while JETMF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas JETMF's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JETMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to JETMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs VIAAY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, VIAAY has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while VIAAY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas VIAAY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VIAAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to VIAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs SASBQ Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SASBQ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while SASBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas SASBQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SASBQ's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to SASBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CAJTF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CAJTF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CAJTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CAJTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CAJTF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CAJTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs HRBR Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, HRBR has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while HRBR trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas HRBR's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HRBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to HRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs LTMAY Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, LTMAY has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while LTMAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas LTMAY's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LTMAY's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to LTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs SKAS Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SKAS has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while SKAS trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas SKAS's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SKAS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to SKAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CEBUF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CEBUF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CEBUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CEBUF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CEBUF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CEBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs ACAVF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ACAVF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while ACAVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas ACAVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ACAVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ACAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs NOKPF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NOKPF has a market cap of 745.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while NOKPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas NOKPF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NOKPF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to NOKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs JETR Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, JETR has a market cap of 648.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while JETR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas JETR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JETR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to JETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs KLMR Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, KLMR has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while KLMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas KLMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to KLMR's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to KLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs PACC Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PACC has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while PACC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas PACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PACC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to PACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs BPOL Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, BPOL has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while BPOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas BPOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BPOL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to BPOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs GLUX Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GLUX has a market cap of 898. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while GLUX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas GLUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GLUX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to GLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs RHWI Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, RHWI has a market cap of 122. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while RHWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas RHWI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to RHWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to RHWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.
ICAGY vs CHHCF Comparison
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CHHCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $9.34, while CHHCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.85, whereas CHHCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CHHCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CHHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.