International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A.
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (ICAGY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICAGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICAGY | $11.60 | -2.36% | 27.1B | 7.62 | $1.53 | +1.72% |
| ANNSF | $31.84 | +0.13% | 48.8B | 12.76 | $2.55 | +3.46% |
| ANYYY | $16.17 | +1.25% | 48.5B | 12.72 | $1.27 | +3.43% |
| RYAOF | $38.00 | +0.00% | 39.9B | 15.08 | $2.52 | +1.29% |
| AFLYY | $1.49 | +4.86% | 39.1B | 3.82 | $0.39 | N/A |
| BABWF | $6.00 | +0.00% | 27.4B | 7.89 | $0.76 | +1.92% |
| AIPUY | $17.93 | +0.73% | 25.6B | 44.83 | $0.40 | +0.99% |
| CHEAF | $0.80 | +0.00% | 23.6B | -80.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AIPUF | $1.58 | +170.04% | 22.6B | 39.50 | $0.04 | +1.62% |
| AICAF | $0.94 | +0.00% | 19.5B | 94.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ICAGY vs ANNSF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ANNSF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ANNSF trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ANNSF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ANNSF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ANNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ANNSF's competition here
ICAGY vs ANYYY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ANYYY has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ANYYY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ANYYY's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ANYYY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ANYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ANYYY's competition here
ICAGY vs RYAOF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, RYAOF has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while RYAOF trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RYAOF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to RYAOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to RYAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check RYAOF's competition here
ICAGY vs AFLYY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AFLYY has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AFLYY trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AFLYY's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AFLYY's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to AFLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AFLYY's competition here
ICAGY vs BABWF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BABWF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while BABWF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BABWF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BABWF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to BABWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check BABWF's competition here
ICAGY vs AIPUY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AIPUY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AIPUY trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AIPUY's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AIPUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AIPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AIPUY's competition here
ICAGY vs CHEAF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CHEAF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CHEAF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CHEAF's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CHEAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CHEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CHEAF's competition here
ICAGY vs AIPUF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AIPUF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AIPUF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AIPUF's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AIPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to AIPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AIPUF's competition here
ICAGY vs AICAF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AICAF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AICAF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AICAF's P/E ratio is 94.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AICAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AICAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AICAF's competition here
ICAGY vs CHKIF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CHKIF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CHKIF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CHKIF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CHKIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CHKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CHKIF's competition here
ICAGY vs SINGY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SINGY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while SINGY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SINGY's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SINGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to SINGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check SINGY's competition here
ICAGY vs SINGF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SINGF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while SINGF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SINGF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SINGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to SINGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check SINGF's competition here
ICAGY vs AIRYY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AIRYY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AIRYY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AIRYY's P/E ratio is 633.33. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AIRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AIRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AIRYY's competition here
ICAGY vs APTPF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, APTPF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while APTPF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas APTPF's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to APTPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to APTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check APTPF's competition here
ICAGY vs GPAEF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GPAEF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while GPAEF trades at $29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GPAEF's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GPAEF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to GPAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check GPAEF's competition here
ICAGY vs AEOXF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AEOXF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AEOXF trades at $143.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AEOXF's P/E ratio is 132.80. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AEOXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AEOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AEOXF's competition here
ICAGY vs ARRPY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ARRPY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ARRPY trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ARRPY's P/E ratio is 122.77. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ARRPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ARRPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ARRPY's competition here
ICAGY vs DLAKY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DLAKY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while DLAKY trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DLAKY's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DLAKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to DLAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check DLAKY's competition here
ICAGY vs DLAKF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DLAKF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while DLAKF trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DLAKF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to DLAKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to DLAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check DLAKF's competition here
ICAGY vs QABSY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, QABSY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while QABSY trades at $37.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas QABSY's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to QABSY's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to QABSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check QABSY's competition here
ICAGY vs CPCAY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CPCAY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CPCAY trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CPCAY's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CPCAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CPCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CPCAY's competition here
ICAGY vs QUBSF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, QUBSF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while QUBSF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas QUBSF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to QUBSF's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to QUBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check QUBSF's competition here
ICAGY vs TKHVY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TKHVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while TKHVY trades at $73.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TKHVY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to TKHVY's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to TKHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check TKHVY's competition here
ICAGY vs CPCAF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CPCAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CPCAF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CPCAF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CPCAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CPCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CPCAF's competition here
ICAGY vs UZAPF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, UZAPF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while UZAPF trades at $348.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas UZAPF's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to UZAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to UZAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check UZAPF's competition here
ICAGY vs ASRMF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ASRMF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ASRMF trades at $37.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ASRMF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ASRMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ASRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ASRMF's competition here
ICAGY vs FLGZY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FLGZY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while FLGZY trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FLGZY's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FLGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to FLGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check FLGZY's competition here
ICAGY vs ALNPY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ALNPY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ALNPY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ALNPY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ALNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ALNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ALNPY's competition here
ICAGY vs ALNPF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ALNPF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ALNPF trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ALNPF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ALNPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ALNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ALNPF's competition here
ICAGY vs AUKNY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AUKNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AUKNY trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AUKNY's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AUKNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to AUKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AUKNY's competition here
ICAGY vs ACKDF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ACKDF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ACKDF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ACKDF's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ACKDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ACKDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ACKDF's competition here
ICAGY vs JAPSY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JAPSY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while JAPSY trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JAPSY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JAPSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to JAPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check JAPSY's competition here
ICAGY vs JPNRF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JPNRF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while JPNRF trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JPNRF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JPNRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to JPNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check JPNRF's competition here
ICAGY vs FPRUF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FPRUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while FPRUF trades at $84.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FPRUF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FPRUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to FPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check FPRUF's competition here
ICAGY vs FPRUY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FPRUY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while FPRUY trades at $40.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FPRUY's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FPRUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to FPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check FPRUY's competition here
ICAGY vs TAWNF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TAWNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while TAWNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TAWNF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to TAWNF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to TAWNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check TAWNF's competition here
ICAGY vs GAERF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GAERF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while GAERF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GAERF's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GAERF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to GAERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check GAERF's competition here
ICAGY vs ESYJY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ESYJY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ESYJY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ESYJY's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ESYJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ESYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ESYJY's competition here
ICAGY vs WZZZY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WZZZY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while WZZZY trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas WZZZY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to WZZZY's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to WZZZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check WZZZY's competition here
ICAGY vs EJTTF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EJTTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while EJTTF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas EJTTF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to EJTTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to EJTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check EJTTF's competition here
ICAGY vs FGWLF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FGWLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while FGWLF trades at $56.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FGWLF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FGWLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to FGWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check FGWLF's competition here
ICAGY vs ACDVF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ACDVF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ACDVF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ACDVF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ACDVF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ACDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ACDVF's competition here
ICAGY vs EIFZF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EIFZF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while EIFZF trades at $72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas EIFZF's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to EIFZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to EIFZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check EIFZF's competition here
ICAGY vs SPASF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SPASF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while SPASF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SPASF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SPASF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to SPASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check SPASF's competition here
ICAGY vs AFRAF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AFRAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AFRAF trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AFRAF's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AFRAF's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to AFRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AFRAF's competition here
ICAGY vs ELALF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ELALF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ELALF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ELALF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ELALF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ELALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ELALF's competition here
ICAGY vs JTTRY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JTTRY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while JTTRY trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JTTRY's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JTTRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to JTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check JTTRY's competition here
ICAGY vs SEGSF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SEGSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while SEGSF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SEGSF's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SEGSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to SEGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check SEGSF's competition here
ICAGY vs TAVHY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TAVHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while TAVHY trades at $29.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TAVHY's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to TAVHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to TAVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check TAVHY's competition here
ICAGY vs JAIRF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JAIRF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while JAIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JAIRF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JAIRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to JAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check JAIRF's competition here
ICAGY vs NWARF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NWARF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while NWARF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NWARF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NWARF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to NWARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check NWARF's competition here
ICAGY vs WZZAF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WZZAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while WZZAF trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas WZZAF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to WZZAF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to WZZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check WZZAF's competition here
ICAGY vs BJCHF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BJCHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while BJCHF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BJCHF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BJCHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to BJCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check BJCHF's competition here
ICAGY vs AGZNF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AGZNF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AGZNF trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AGZNF's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AGZNF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to AGZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AGZNF's competition here
ICAGY vs ANZFF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ANZFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ANZFF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ANZFF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ANZFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ANZFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ANZFF's competition here
ICAGY vs GRPAF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GRPAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while GRPAF trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GRPAF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GRPAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to GRPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check GRPAF's competition here
ICAGY vs BJCHY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BJCHY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while BJCHY trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BJCHY's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BJCHY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to BJCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check BJCHY's competition here
ICAGY vs ANZLY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ANZLY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ANZLY trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ANZLY's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ANZLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to ANZLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ANZLY's competition here
ICAGY vs CEBUF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CEBUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CEBUF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CEBUF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CEBUF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CEBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CEBUF's competition here
ICAGY vs FNNNF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FNNNF has a market cap of 727M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while FNNNF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FNNNF's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to FNNNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to FNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check FNNNF's competition here
ICAGY vs AIABF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AIABF has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while AIABF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AIABF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to AIABF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to AIABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check AIABF's competition here
ICAGY vs HMCTF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HMCTF has a market cap of 572.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while HMCTF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HMCTF's P/E ratio is -20.17. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HMCTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to HMCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check HMCTF's competition here
ICAGY vs CTTPY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CTTPY has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CTTPY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CTTPY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CTTPY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CTTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CTTPY's competition here
ICAGY vs CHRRF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CHRRF has a market cap of 415.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CHRRF trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CHRRF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CHRRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to CHRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CHRRF's competition here
ICAGY vs NOKFF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NOKFF has a market cap of 354.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while NOKFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NOKFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NOKFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to NOKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check NOKFF's competition here
ICAGY vs VIAAY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, VIAAY has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while VIAAY trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VIAAY's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to VIAAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to VIAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check VIAAY's competition here
ICAGY vs NRSAF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NRSAF has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while NRSAF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NRSAF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NRSAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to NRSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check NRSAF's competition here
ICAGY vs HRBR Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HRBR has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while HRBR trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HRBR's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to HRBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to HRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check HRBR's competition here
ICAGY vs GOLLQ Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GOLLQ has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while GOLLQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GOLLQ's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GOLLQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to GOLLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check GOLLQ's competition here
ICAGY vs CEBUY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CEBUY has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CEBUY trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CEBUY's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CEBUY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CEBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CEBUY's competition here
ICAGY vs JETMF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JETMF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while JETMF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JETMF's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JETMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to JETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check JETMF's competition here
ICAGY vs SASBQ Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SASBQ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while SASBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SASBQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SASBQ's ROE of +2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to SASBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check SASBQ's competition here
ICAGY vs CAJTF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CAJTF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CAJTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CAJTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CAJTF's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CAJTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CAJTF's competition here
ICAGY vs NOKPF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NOKPF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while NOKPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NOKPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to NOKPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to NOKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check NOKPF's competition here
ICAGY vs LTMAY Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LTMAY has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while LTMAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas LTMAY's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to LTMAY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to LTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check LTMAY's competition here
ICAGY vs SKAS Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SKAS has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while SKAS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SKAS's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to SKAS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to SKAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check SKAS's competition here
ICAGY vs ACAVF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ACAVF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while ACAVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ACAVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to ACAVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to ACAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check ACAVF's competition here
ICAGY vs JETR Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JETR has a market cap of 402.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while JETR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JETR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to JETR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to JETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check JETR's competition here
ICAGY vs KLMR Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KLMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while KLMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas KLMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to KLMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to KLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check KLMR's competition here
ICAGY vs PACC Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PACC has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while PACC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PACC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to PACC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to PACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check PACC's competition here
ICAGY vs BPOL Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BPOL has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while BPOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BPOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to BPOL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to BPOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check BPOL's competition here
ICAGY vs GLUX Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GLUX has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while GLUX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GLUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to GLUX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to GLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check GLUX's competition here
ICAGY vs RHWI Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, RHWI has a market cap of 122. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while RHWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RHWI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to RHWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is more volatile compared to RHWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check RHWI's competition here
ICAGY vs CHHCF Comparison February 2026
ICAGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICAGY stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CHHCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICAGY is priced at $11.60, while CHHCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICAGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CHHCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICAGY's ROE is +0.54%, compared to CHHCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICAGY is less volatile compared to CHHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICAGY.Check CHHCF's competition here