International Business Machines Corporation
International Business Machines Corporation IBM.L Peers
See (IBM.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM.L | $118.95 | N/A | 192.56B | 17.34 | $6.86 | +2.81% |
| WISE.L | $1,039.00 | -0.19% | 10.65B | 25.34 | $0.41 | N/A |
| 0RV0.L | $126.08 | N/A | 4.72B | 31.26 | $4.03 | +0.63% |
| 0GNK.L | $292.60 | N/A | 3.89B | 22.01 | $13.29 | +2.67% |
| SCT.L | $1,791.00 | -0.50% | 3.57B | 28.89 | $0.62 | +1.66% |
| CCC.L | $2,560.00 | +0.23% | 2.68B | 16.73 | $1.53 | +2.76% |
| 0O1S.L | $124.20 | +0.22% | 2.62B | 20.60 | $6.03 | +1.98% |
| NETW.L | $399.40 | +0.10% | 2.13B | 44.38 | $0.09 | N/A |
| 0K45.L | $11.08 | +5.67% | 1.53B | 86.52 | $0.13 | N/A |
| 0A6Y.L | $5.64 | +1.95% | 709.25M | -1.73 | -$3.26 | +15.56% |
Stock Comparison
IBM.L vs WISE.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, WISE.L has a market cap of 10.65B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while WISE.L trades at $1,039.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WISE.L's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WISE.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to WISE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0RV0.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, 0RV0.L has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while 0RV0.L trades at $126.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0RV0.L's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0RV0.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0RV0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0GNK.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, 0GNK.L has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while 0GNK.L trades at $292.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0GNK.L's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0GNK.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0GNK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs SCT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, SCT.L has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while SCT.L trades at $1,791.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SCT.L's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SCT.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to SCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs CCC.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, CCC.L has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while CCC.L trades at $2,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CCC.L's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CCC.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to CCC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0O1S.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, 0O1S.L has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while 0O1S.L trades at $124.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0O1S.L's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0O1S.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0O1S.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs NETW.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, NETW.L has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while NETW.L trades at $399.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas NETW.L's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NETW.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and NETW.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs 0K45.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, 0K45.L has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while 0K45.L trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0K45.L's P/E ratio is 86.52. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0K45.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0K45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0A6Y.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, 0A6Y.L has a market cap of 709.25M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while 0A6Y.L trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0A6Y.L's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0A6Y.L's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0A6Y.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs FDP.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, FDP.L has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while FDP.L trades at $2,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas FDP.L's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FDP.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to FDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0RIW.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, 0RIW.L has a market cap of 442.86M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while 0RIW.L trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0RIW.L's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0RIW.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0RIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs USY.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, USY.L has a market cap of 433.35M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while USY.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas USY.L's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to USY.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to USY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs FDM.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, FDM.L has a market cap of 260.19M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while FDM.L trades at $238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas FDM.L's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FDM.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to FDM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs KCT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, KCT.L has a market cap of 224.91M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while KCT.L trades at $129.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KCT.L's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KCT.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to KCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs RCN.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, RCN.L has a market cap of 202.12M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while RCN.L trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas RCN.L's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RCN.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to RCN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs ECK.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, ECK.L has a market cap of 168.40M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while ECK.L trades at $53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ECK.L's P/E ratio is 53.80. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ECK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to ECK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs IBPO.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, IBPO.L has a market cap of 113.70M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while IBPO.L trades at $59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas IBPO.L's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IBPO.L's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and IBPO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs 0CHZ.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, 0CHZ.L has a market cap of 113.37M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while 0CHZ.L trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0CHZ.L's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0CHZ.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0CHZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs TRD.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, TRD.L has a market cap of 50.87M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while TRD.L trades at $292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas TRD.L's P/E ratio is 73.00. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TRD.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and TRD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs MTEC.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, MTEC.L has a market cap of 40.68M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while MTEC.L trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas MTEC.L's P/E ratio is -27.25. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MTEC.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to MTEC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs KBT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, KBT.L has a market cap of 38.69M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while KBT.L trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KBT.L's P/E ratio is -17.30. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KBT.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to KBT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs GST.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, GST.L has a market cap of 25.44M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while GST.L trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas GST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GST.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to GST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs CSFS.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, CSFS.L has a market cap of 22.97M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while CSFS.L trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CSFS.L's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CSFS.L's ROE of +2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and CSFS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs TPX.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, TPX.L has a market cap of 21.78M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while TPX.L trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas TPX.L's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to TPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs TIA.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, TIA.L has a market cap of 19.01M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while TIA.L trades at $77.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas TIA.L's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TIA.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to TIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs GRC.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, GRC.L has a market cap of 8.09M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while GRC.L trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas GRC.L's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GRC.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to GRC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs MRIT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, MRIT.L has a market cap of 5.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while MRIT.L trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas MRIT.L's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MRIT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to MRIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs ACT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, ACT.L has a market cap of 983664.00. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while ACT.L trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ACT.L's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ACT.L's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and ACT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs PTY.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.56B. In comparison, PTY.L has a market cap of 850377.00. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at $118.95, while PTY.L trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas PTY.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PTY.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and PTY.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).