International Business Machines Corporation
International Business Machines Corporation IBM.L Peers
See (IBM.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM.L | £118.95 | N/A | 192.6B | 17.34 | £6.86 | +2.81% |
| WISE.L | £1,011.00 | -2.13% | 10.4B | 25.28 | £0.40 | N/A |
| 0RV0.L | £126.08 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 31.26 | £4.03 | +0.83% |
| 0GNK.L | £292.60 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 22.01 | £13.29 | +3.10% |
| SCT.L | £1,617.00 | -1.04% | 3.2B | 26.08 | £0.62 | +1.84% |
| 0O1S.L | £124.20 | +0.22% | 2.5B | 20.60 | £6.03 | +1.99% |
| CCC.L | £2,240.00 | -1.41% | 2.3B | 14.64 | £1.53 | +2.89% |
| NETW.L | £399.40 | +0.10% | 2.1B | 44.38 | £0.09 | N/A |
| 0K45.L | £14.07 | -1.85% | 2B | 113.43 | £0.13 | N/A |
| 0A6Y.L | £5.57 | +6.10% | 704M | -1.72 | -£3.26 | +11.47% |
Stock Comparison
IBM.L vs WISE.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, WISE.L has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while WISE.L trades at £1,011.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas WISE.L's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WISE.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to WISE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0RV0.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 0RV0.L has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while 0RV0.L trades at £126.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0RV0.L's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0RV0.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0RV0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0GNK.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 0GNK.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while 0GNK.L trades at £292.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0GNK.L's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0GNK.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0GNK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs SCT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, SCT.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while SCT.L trades at £1,617.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas SCT.L's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SCT.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to SCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0O1S.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 0O1S.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while 0O1S.L trades at £124.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0O1S.L's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0O1S.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0O1S.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs CCC.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, CCC.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while CCC.L trades at £2,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CCC.L's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CCC.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to CCC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs NETW.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, NETW.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while NETW.L trades at £399.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas NETW.L's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NETW.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and NETW.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs 0K45.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 0K45.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while 0K45.L trades at £14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0K45.L's P/E ratio is 113.43. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0K45.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0K45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0A6Y.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 0A6Y.L has a market cap of 704M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while 0A6Y.L trades at £5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0A6Y.L's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0A6Y.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0A6Y.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0RIW.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 0RIW.L has a market cap of 548.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while 0RIW.L trades at £23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0RIW.L's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0RIW.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0RIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs FDP.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, FDP.L has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while FDP.L trades at £2,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas FDP.L's P/E ratio is -25.52. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FDP.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and FDP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs USY.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, USY.L has a market cap of 433.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while USY.L trades at £6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas USY.L's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to USY.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to USY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs KCT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, KCT.L has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while KCT.L trades at £129.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KCT.L's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KCT.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to KCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs FDM.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, FDM.L has a market cap of 221.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while FDM.L trades at £203.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas FDM.L's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FDM.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to FDM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs RCN.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, RCN.L has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while RCN.L trades at £124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas RCN.L's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RCN.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to RCN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs ECK.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, ECK.L has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while ECK.L trades at £53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ECK.L's P/E ratio is 53.80. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ECK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to ECK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs 0CHZ.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 0CHZ.L has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while 0CHZ.L trades at £0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas 0CHZ.L's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0CHZ.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to 0CHZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs IBPO.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, IBPO.L has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while IBPO.L trades at £59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas IBPO.L's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IBPO.L's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and IBPO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs MTEC.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, MTEC.L has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while MTEC.L trades at £35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas MTEC.L's P/E ratio is -35.25. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MTEC.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to MTEC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs TRD.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, TRD.L has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while TRD.L trades at £300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas TRD.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TRD.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to TRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs KBT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, KBT.L has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while KBT.L trades at £65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas KBT.L's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KBT.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to KBT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs GST.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, GST.L has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while GST.L trades at £1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas GST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GST.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to GST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs CSFS.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, CSFS.L has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while CSFS.L trades at £40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas CSFS.L's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CSFS.L's ROE of +2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and CSFS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs TPX.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, TPX.L has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while TPX.L trades at £22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas TPX.L's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to TPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs TIA.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, TIA.L has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while TIA.L trades at £64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas TIA.L's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TIA.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to TIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs GRC.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, GRC.L has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while GRC.L trades at £7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas GRC.L's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GRC.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to GRC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs MRIT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, MRIT.L has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while MRIT.L trades at £25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas MRIT.L's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MRIT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L is less volatile compared to MRIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBM.L.
IBM.L vs ACT.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, ACT.L has a market cap of 983.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while ACT.L trades at £0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas ACT.L's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ACT.L's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and ACT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs PTY.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, PTY.L has a market cap of 850.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while PTY.L trades at £0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas PTY.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PTY.L's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IBM.L and PTY.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IBM.L vs IDE.L Comparison
IBM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBM.L stands at 192.6B. In comparison, IDE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IBM.L is priced at £118.95, while IDE.L trades at £72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 17.34, whereas IDE.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, IBM.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IDE.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IBM.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and IDE.L has daily volatility of N/A.