iMining Technologies Inc.
iMining Technologies Inc. IBKKF Peers
See (IBKKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKKF | $0.04 | N/A | 112.14B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.51B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +16.48% |
| CIIHY | $28.03 | +4.98% | 56.34B | 13.48 | $2.08 | +3.76% |
| MQBKY | $140.03 | +3.05% | 53.92B | 19.50 | $7.18 | +3.17% |
| CIIHF | $2.55 | +41.67% | 49.70B | 12.14 | $0.21 | +3.93% |
| MCQEF | $123.04 | +7.29% | 44.86B | 17.11 | $7.19 | +4.02% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | N/A | 37.92B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +6.12% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | N/A | 18.56B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +27.28% |
| NRSCF | $6.00 | -0.83% | 17.74B | 7.79 | $0.77 | +0.04% |
| HUATF | $1.25 | N/A | 15.68B | 5.21 | $0.24 | +7.07% |
Stock Comparison
IBKKF vs HAITY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CIIHY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 56.34B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CIIHY trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs MQBKY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 53.92B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while MQBKY trades at $140.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CIIHF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 49.70B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs MCQEF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 44.86B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while MCQEF trades at $123.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs GUOSF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 37.92B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs HTNGF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs NRSCF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs HUATF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CMSQY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CMSQY trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CMSQF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CMSQF trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CNICF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.95B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs DSECF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while DSECF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs DSEEY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while DSEEY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs WSOUF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BRPHF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BRPHF trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs IVTJF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs IGGHY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while IGGHY trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs IVTJY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs IGGRF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CLPE Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CGXYY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CGXYY trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 193.64. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs LTSAP Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while LTSAP trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs PLSQF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs TCAPF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs LTSA Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs FNNTF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs DEFTF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while DEFTF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -45.56. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs MAUSY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs NHMAF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs MNXBF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CFNCF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs LKADF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.68M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CBGPY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 683.21M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CBGPY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CCORF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 663.36M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CCORF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs PHIG Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 595.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while PHIG trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs PHIGW Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 582.23M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CBGPF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 525.22M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CBGPF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CYFRF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 456.61M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CYFRF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 99.38. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs NAGGF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 446.98M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CNSRF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 430.87M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CNSRF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CESTY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.83M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs ABGSF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.37M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CESTF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.14M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs APPCF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.24M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs OSHDF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs ABIT Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 218.26M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CSCHF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 205.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs PROP Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 188.52M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while PROP trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs NPPTF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 175.22M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while NPPTF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs OZFRY Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 172.90M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while OZFRY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs PNPFF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 155.28M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while PNPFF trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CAGPF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs STGC Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CURN Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 91.74M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CURN trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 39.56. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs GEVI Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 91.66M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while GEVI trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs DGTLF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 80.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs XAUMF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 78.29M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while XAUMF trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs DYNA Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.51M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while DYNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs HAFG Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 71.25M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while HAFG trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs ARCNF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 54.95M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs UFFRF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs DMGGF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 37.67M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while DMGGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CMZZF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.91M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BBKCF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 29.27M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CRMZ Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 27.66M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CRMZ trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CFLSF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CBTTF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 26.06M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CBTTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs EBML Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs ARBKF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 22.82M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs SMURF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BULT Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 18.15M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BULT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BCNWF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 16.54M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs FWAV Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs MATEF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 14.07M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while MATEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs FDCT Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 12.68M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while FDCT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs AVFCF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs DPXCF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs ABSOF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs IHLDF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 8.09M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while IHLDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs ITEX Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while ITEX trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs FFTTF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 6.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BTCWF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BTCWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BLVDF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CCPUF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CSTXF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs AAMTF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5.04M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BIDCF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 5.01M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BIDCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs PHIL Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs HYHDF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 4.29M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while HYHDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BZRD Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs CRKR Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs TRAA Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 3.18M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while TRAA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TRAA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BKBLF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3.00M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs GBCHF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs DBKSF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while DBKSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs PIHG Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while PIHG trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs BKLIF Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.
IBKKF vs NSAV Comparison
IBKKF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBKKF stands at 112.14B. In comparison, NSAV has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, IBKKF is priced at $0.04, while NSAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBKKF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBKKF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NSAV's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IBKKF is more volatile compared to NSAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBKKF.