Hybrid Software Group PLC
Hybrid Software Group PLC HYSG.BR Peers
See (HYSG.BR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYSG.BR | $3.60 | N/A | 118.25M | -45.00 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| DSY.PA | $33.59 | -1.21% | 44.12B | 37.74 | $0.89 | +0.68% |
| ALTTU.PA | $5.45 | N/A | 4.48B | -545.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| VU.PA | $217.00 | +9.32% | 3.48B | -79.78 | -$2.72 | +0.14% |
| ALESK.PA | $277.40 | N/A | 1.65B | 100.14 | $2.77 | +0.23% |
| LSS.PA | $23.70 | +0.42% | 895.80M | 29.62 | $0.80 | +1.69% |
| ESI.PA | $154.00 | -0.32% | 879.49M | -700.00 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| AXW.PA | $27.50 | N/A | 800.49M | 19.10 | $1.44 | N/A |
| TOM2.AS | $4.76 | -2.50% | 585.78M | -59.52 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| QDT.PA | $16.42 | -2.26% | 553.84M | 8.42 | $1.95 | +3.96% |
Stock Comparison
HYSG.BR vs DSY.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, DSY.PA has a market cap of 44.12B. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while DSY.PA trades at $33.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas DSY.PA's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DSY.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to DSY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALTTU.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALTTU.PA has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALTTU.PA trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALTTU.PA's P/E ratio is -545.00. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTTU.PA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALTTU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs VU.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, VU.PA has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while VU.PA trades at $217.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas VU.PA's P/E ratio is -79.78. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VU.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to VU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALESK.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALESK.PA has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALESK.PA trades at $277.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALESK.PA's P/E ratio is 100.14. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALESK.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to ALESK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs LSS.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, LSS.PA has a market cap of 895.80M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while LSS.PA trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas LSS.PA's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LSS.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to LSS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ESI.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ESI.PA has a market cap of 879.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ESI.PA trades at $154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ESI.PA's P/E ratio is -700.00. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESI.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ESI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs AXW.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, AXW.PA has a market cap of 800.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while AXW.PA trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas AXW.PA's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AXW.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to AXW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs TOM2.AS Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, TOM2.AS has a market cap of 585.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while TOM2.AS trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas TOM2.AS's P/E ratio is -59.52. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TOM2.AS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to TOM2.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs QDT.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, QDT.PA has a market cap of 553.84M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while QDT.PA trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas QDT.PA's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QDT.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to QDT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALBFR.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALBFR.PA has a market cap of 364.27M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALBFR.PA trades at $258.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALBFR.PA's P/E ratio is 49.43. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALBFR.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to ALBFR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs LIN.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, LIN.PA has a market cap of 351.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while LIN.PA trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas LIN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LIN.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to LIN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALTBG.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALTBG.PA has a market cap of 310.61M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALTBG.PA trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALTBG.PA's P/E ratio is 146.50. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTBG.PA's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to ALTBG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs SWP.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, SWP.PA has a market cap of 308.55M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while SWP.PA trades at $32.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas SWP.PA's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWP.PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to SWP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs CMCOM.AS Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, CMCOM.AS has a market cap of 217.89M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while CMCOM.AS trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas CMCOM.AS's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMCOM.AS's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to CMCOM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs MTRK.AS Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, MTRK.AS has a market cap of 203.77M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while MTRK.AS trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas MTRK.AS's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTRK.AS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to MTRK.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALVIV.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALVIV.PA has a market cap of 170.12M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALVIV.PA trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALVIV.PA's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALVIV.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALVIV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs CLA.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, CLA.PA has a market cap of 161.18M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while CLA.PA trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas CLA.PA's P/E ratio is -56.40. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLA.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to CLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs UPG.BR Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, UPG.BR has a market cap of 131.45M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while UPG.BR trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas UPG.BR's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UPG.BR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to UPG.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALSTW.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALSTW.PA has a market cap of 97.29M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALSTW.PA trades at $36.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALSTW.PA's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALSTW.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALSTW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALPRO.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALPRO.PA has a market cap of 87.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALPRO.PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALPRO.PA's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALPRO.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to ALPRO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs DLE.IR Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, DLE.IR has a market cap of 63.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while DLE.IR trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas DLE.IR's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DLE.IR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to DLE.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs TIE.AS Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, TIE.AS has a market cap of 62.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while TIE.AS trades at $31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas TIE.AS's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TIE.AS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to TIE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALPHI.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALPHI.PA has a market cap of 60.88M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALPHI.PA trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALPHI.PA's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALPHI.PA's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALPHI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs COH.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, COH.PA has a market cap of 45.14M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while COH.PA trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas COH.PA's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COH.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to COH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALTTI.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALTTI.PA has a market cap of 26.77M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALTTI.PA trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALTTI.PA's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTTI.PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALTTI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALWED.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALWED.PA has a market cap of 26.31M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALWED.PA trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALWED.PA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALWED.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALWED.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALPRG.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALPRG.PA has a market cap of 24.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALPRG.PA trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALPRG.PA's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALPRG.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to ALPRG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs MLMCA.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, MLMCA.PA has a market cap of 22.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while MLMCA.PA trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas MLMCA.PA's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLMCA.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to MLMCA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs EXR.IR Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, EXR.IR has a market cap of 20.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while EXR.IR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas EXR.IR's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EXR.IR's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to EXR.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALVGO.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALVGO.PA has a market cap of 14.74M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALVGO.PA trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALVGO.PA's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALVGO.PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALVGO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALNRG.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALNRG.PA has a market cap of 10.41M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALNRG.PA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALNRG.PA's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALNRG.PA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to ALNRG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs PROAC.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, PROAC.PA has a market cap of 7.52M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while PROAC.PA trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas PROAC.PA's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PROAC.PA's ROE of -28.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to PROAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs NEDSE.AS Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, NEDSE.AS has a market cap of 6.15M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while NEDSE.AS trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas NEDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEDSE.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to NEDSE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs MLPAC.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, MLPAC.PA has a market cap of 5.02M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while MLPAC.PA trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas MLPAC.PA's P/E ratio is -31.61. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLPAC.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to MLPAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs GOJXN.AS Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, GOJXN.AS has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while GOJXN.AS trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas GOJXN.AS's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GOJXN.AS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to GOJXN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs MLTV.BR Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, MLTV.BR has a market cap of 3.91M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while MLTV.BR trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas MLTV.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLTV.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to MLTV.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALSIM.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALSIM.PA has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALSIM.PA trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALSIM.PA's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALSIM.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALSIM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs EOS.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, EOS.PA has a market cap of 3.60M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while EOS.PA trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas EOS.PA's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EOS.PA's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to EOS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs MLDAM.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, MLDAM.PA has a market cap of 2.64M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while MLDAM.PA trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas MLDAM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLDAM.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to MLDAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALIMR.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALIMR.PA has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALIMR.PA trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALIMR.PA's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALIMR.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALIMR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs MLIDS.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, MLIDS.PA has a market cap of 1.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while MLIDS.PA trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas MLIDS.PA's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLIDS.PA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to MLIDS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ALNMR.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ALNMR.PA has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ALNMR.PA trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ALNMR.PA's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALNMR.PA's ROE of +5.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ALNMR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs MLMGL.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, MLMGL.PA has a market cap of 253025.00. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while MLMGL.PA trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas MLMGL.PA's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLMGL.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to MLMGL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs ICT.AS Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, ICT.AS has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while ICT.AS trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ICT.AS's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICT.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to ICT.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs 6VR.IR Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, 6VR.IR has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while 6VR.IR trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas 6VR.IR's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6VR.IR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to 6VR.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs GENX.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, GENX.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while GENX.PA trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas GENX.PA's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GENX.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to GENX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs CAS.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, CAS.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while CAS.PA trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas CAS.PA's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CAS.PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is more volatile compared to CAS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs PROL.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, PROL.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while PROL.PA trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas PROL.PA's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PROL.PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to PROL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.
HYSG.BR vs IGE.PA Comparison
HYSG.BR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYSG.BR stands at 118.25M. In comparison, IGE.PA has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HYSG.BR is priced at $3.60, while IGE.PA trades at $210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYSG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas IGE.PA's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, HYSG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IGE.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HYSG.BR is less volatile compared to IGE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYSG.BR.