Harworth Group plc
Harworth Group plc HWG.L Peers
See (HWG.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWG.L | $173.50 | -2.25% | 562.37M | 10.21 | $0.17 | +0.93% |
| HKLD.L | $7.41 | N/A | 16.32B | -11.76 | -$0.63 | +4.58% |
| HKLB.L | $7.41 | N/A | 10.82B | -49.40 | -$0.15 | +4.58% |
| HKLJ.L | $7.41 | N/A | 10.82B | -49.40 | -$0.15 | +4.58% |
| DAR.L | $8.35 | +3.09% | 1.50B | 104.38 | $0.08 | N/A |
| 0QN6.L | $96.20 | -0.21% | 323.13M | 7.96 | $12.09 | +3.83% |
| MOH.L | $27.50 | N/A | 78.31M | -27.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ROAD.L | $31.00 | -1.29% | 44.54M | -7.75 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| ASPL.L | $0.08 | N/A | 19.91M | -2.06 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| INLZ.L | $54.10 | +1.12% | 11.89M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HWG.L vs HKLD.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, HKLD.L has a market cap of 16.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while HKLD.L trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas HKLD.L's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKLD.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to HKLD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs HKLB.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, HKLB.L has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while HKLB.L trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas HKLB.L's P/E ratio is -49.40. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKLB.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to HKLB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs HKLJ.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, HKLJ.L has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while HKLJ.L trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas HKLJ.L's P/E ratio is -49.40. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKLJ.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to HKLJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs DAR.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, DAR.L has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while DAR.L trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas DAR.L's P/E ratio is 104.38. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is less volatile compared to DAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs 0QN6.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, 0QN6.L has a market cap of 323.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while 0QN6.L trades at $96.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas 0QN6.L's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QN6.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0QN6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs MOH.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, MOH.L has a market cap of 78.31M. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while MOH.L trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas MOH.L's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOH.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to MOH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs ROAD.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, ROAD.L has a market cap of 44.54M. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while ROAD.L trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas ROAD.L's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROAD.L's ROE of +5.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is less volatile compared to ROAD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs ASPL.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, ASPL.L has a market cap of 19.91M. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while ASPL.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas ASPL.L's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASPL.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to ASPL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs INLZ.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, INLZ.L has a market cap of 11.89M. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while INLZ.L trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas INLZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INLZ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to INLZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs INL.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, INL.L has a market cap of 5.52M. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while INL.L trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas INL.L's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to INL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs 0RFZ.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, 0RFZ.L has a market cap of 2.77M. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while 0RFZ.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas 0RFZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RFZ.L's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0RFZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs PLAZ.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, PLAZ.L has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while PLAZ.L trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas PLAZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLAZ.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to PLAZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs OHG.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, OHG.L has a market cap of 796773.00. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while OHG.L trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas OHG.L's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OHG.L's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to OHG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.
HWG.L vs TRAF.L Comparison
HWG.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWG.L stands at 562.37M. In comparison, TRAF.L has a market cap of 329757.00. Regarding current trading prices, HWG.L is priced at $173.50, while TRAF.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.21, whereas TRAF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWG.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRAF.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HWG.L is more volatile compared to TRAF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWG.L.