Heavitree Brewery Plc

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HXW.L has a market cap of 67.29B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 0HXW.L trades at $49.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HXW.L's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HXW.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0HXW.L has daily volatility of 4.92.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CPG.L has a market cap of 44.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while CPG.L trades at $2,605.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPG.L's P/E ratio is 42.02. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPG.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and CPG.L has daily volatility of 1.11.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VFA.L has a market cap of 42.68B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 0VFA.L trades at $94.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VFA.L's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0VFA.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0VFA.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QKI.L has a market cap of 26.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 0QKI.L trades at $516.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QKI.L's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QKI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0QKI.L has daily volatility of 0.19.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0I77.L has a market cap of 23.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 0I77.L trades at $197.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0I77.L's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0I77.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0I77.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0M30.L has a market cap of 16.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 0M30.L trades at $44.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0M30.L's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0M30.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0M30.L has daily volatility of 1.66.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MAB.L has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while MAB.L trades at $267.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAB.L's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and MAB.L has daily volatility of 2.26.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SSPG.L has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while SSPG.L trades at $161.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSPG.L's P/E ratio is 53.77. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSPG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and SSPG.L has daily volatility of 3.31.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DOM.L has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while DOM.L trades at $265.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOM.L's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DOM.L's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and DOM.L has daily volatility of 2.80.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JDW.L has a market cap of 801.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while JDW.L trades at $725.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDW.L's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JDW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and JDW.L has daily volatility of 1.94.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, YNGA.L has a market cap of 505.53M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while YNGA.L trades at $953.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNGA.L's P/E ratio is 45.38. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YNGA.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and YNGA.L has daily volatility of 1.80.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, YNGN.L has a market cap of 502.88M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while YNGN.L trades at $628.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNGN.L's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YNGN.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and YNGN.L has daily volatility of 1.17.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RTN.L has a market cap of 499.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while RTN.L trades at $64.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTN.L's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTN.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and RTN.L has daily volatility of N/A.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KT6.L has a market cap of 380.04M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 0KT6.L trades at $42.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KT6.L's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KT6.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0KT6.L has daily volatility of 1.22.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LGRS.L has a market cap of 352.48M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while LGRS.L trades at $324.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGRS.L's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGRS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and LGRS.L has daily volatility of 0.77.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 53GW.L has a market cap of 320.66M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 53GW.L trades at $88.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 53GW.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 53GW.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 53GW.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FSTA.L has a market cap of 307.88M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while FSTA.L trades at $578.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTA.L's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSTA.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and FSTA.L has daily volatility of 4.40.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DPEU.L has a market cap of 287.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while DPEU.L trades at $190.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPEU.L's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPEU.L's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and DPEU.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MARS.L has a market cap of 259.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while MARS.L trades at $40.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARS.L's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MARS.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and MARS.L has daily volatility of 3.19.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CPC.L has a market cap of 153.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while CPC.L trades at $139.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPC.L's P/E ratio is 139.00. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and CPC.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FUL.L has a market cap of 89.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while FUL.L trades at $14.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUL.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and FUL.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DPP.L has a market cap of 84.80M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while DPP.L trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPP.L's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPP.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and DPP.L has daily volatility of 7.08.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 54GW.L has a market cap of 63.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 54GW.L trades at $104.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 54GW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 54GW.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 54GW.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, VARE.L has a market cap of 23.63M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while VARE.L trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VARE.L's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VARE.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and VARE.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MEX.L has a market cap of 13.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while MEX.L trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEX.L's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEX.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and MEX.L has daily volatility of 5.56.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RBG.L has a market cap of 11.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while RBG.L trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBG.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBG.L's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and RBG.L has daily volatility of 18.18.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HVTA.L has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while HVTA.L trades at $175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVTA.L's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HVTA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and HVTA.L has daily volatility of 1.73.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HVT.L has a market cap of 8.11M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while HVT.L trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT.L's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HVT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and HVT.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NGHT.L has a market cap of 6.71M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while NGHT.L trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGHT.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGHT.L's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and NGHT.L has daily volatility of 31.24.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PIER.L has a market cap of 4.29M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while PIER.L trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIER.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PIER.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and PIER.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, COM.L has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while COM.L trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COM.L's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COM.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and COM.L has daily volatility of 11.89.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TAST.L has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while TAST.L trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAST.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAST.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and TAST.L has daily volatility of 0.80.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DVT.L has a market cap of 567375.00. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while DVT.L trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVT.L's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVT.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and DVT.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MORE.L has a market cap of 195497.00. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while MORE.L trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORE.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MORE.L's ROE of -16.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and MORE.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RR0.L has a market cap of 122506.00. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 0RR0.L trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RR0.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RR0.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 0RR0.L has daily volatility of 0.00.

HVTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HVTB.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 92IP.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HVTB.L is priced at N/A, while 92IP.L trades at $95.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HVTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 92IP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVTB.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 92IP.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A and 92IP.L has daily volatility of 0.00.