Hut 8 Mining Corp.
Hut 8 Mining Corp. (HUT.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUT.TO | CA$65.24 | +9.61% | 7.2B | -22.12 | -CA$2.95 | N/A |
| GS.NE | CA$40.55 | +4.30% | 333.8B | 16.42 | CA$2.47 | +1.86% |
| GLXY.TO | CA$28.26 | -4.69% | 11B | -33.64 | -CA$0.84 | N/A |
| BITF.TO | CA$2.73 | +6.64% | 1.5B | -15.17 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| CF.TO | CA$11.91 | +3.12% | 1.2B | -5.46 | -CA$2.18 | +2.86% |
| CF-PC.TO | CA$24.60 | +0.41% | 1.1B | 11.39 | CA$2.16 | +2.86% |
| DEFI.NE | CA$0.79 | +9.72% | 257.3M | 79.00 | CA$0.01 | N/A |
| XAU.TO | CA$16.13 | +0.06% | 203.6M | 4.84 | CA$3.33 | N/A |
| CXI.TO | CA$24.96 | +0.89% | 149.4M | 7.73 | CA$3.23 | N/A |
| RICH.CN | CA$2.85 | +0.00% | 142.7M | -28.50 | -CA$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUT.TO vs GS.NE Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 333.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while GS.NE trades at CA$40.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check GS.NE's competition here
HUT.TO vs GLXY.TO Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while GLXY.TO trades at CA$28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is -33.64. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check GLXY.TO's competition here
HUT.TO vs BITF.TO Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while BITF.TO trades at CA$2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check BITF.TO's competition here
HUT.TO vs CF.TO Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while CF.TO trades at CA$11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check CF.TO's competition here
HUT.TO vs CF-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while CF-PC.TO trades at CA$24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check CF-PC.TO's competition here
HUT.TO vs DEFI.NE Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while DEFI.NE trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is 79.00. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check DEFI.NE's competition here
HUT.TO vs XAU.TO Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while XAU.TO trades at CA$16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check XAU.TO's competition here
HUT.TO vs CXI.TO Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while CXI.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check CXI.TO's competition here
HUT.TO vs RICH.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while RICH.CN trades at CA$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to RICH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check RICH.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs PNP.TO Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while PNP.TO trades at CA$8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check PNP.TO's competition here
HUT.TO vs BIGG.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while BIGG.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check BIGG.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs HODL.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while HODL.CN trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check HODL.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs BIGG.V Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BIGG.V has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while BIGG.V trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas BIGG.V's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BIGG.V's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is less volatile compared to BIGG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check BIGG.V's competition here
HUT.TO vs FRNT.V Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while FRNT.V trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is less volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check FRNT.V's competition here
HUT.TO vs BTC.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while BTC.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is less volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check BTC.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs SATO.V Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SATO.V has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while SATO.V trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas SATO.V's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SATO.V's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to SATO.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check SATO.V's competition here
HUT.TO vs MATA.V Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MATA.V has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while MATA.V trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas MATA.V's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MATA.V's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to MATA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check MATA.V's competition here
HUT.TO vs HOLD.NE Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while HOLD.NE trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is less volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check HOLD.NE's competition here
HUT.TO vs SIX.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SIX.CN has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while SIX.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to SIX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check SIX.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs ARM.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while ARM.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to ARM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check ARM.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs CODE.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while CODE.CN trades at CA$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to CODE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check CODE.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs GBC.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while GBC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to GBC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check GBC.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs SPIR.CN Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while SPIR.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +33.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check SPIR.CN's competition here
HUT.TO vs BKMT.V Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BKMT.V has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while BKMT.V trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas BKMT.V's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BKMT.V's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is less volatile compared to BKMT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check BKMT.V's competition here
HUT.TO vs FXC.TO Comparison April 2026
HUT.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUT.TO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FXC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUT.TO is priced at CA$65.24, while FXC.TO trades at CA$5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.12, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, HUT.TO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUT.TO is more volatile compared to FXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUT.TO.Check FXC.TO's competition here