Hummingbird Resources PLC
Hummingbird Resources PLC HUM.L Peers
See (HUM.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUM.L | £2.70 | -1.82% | 46M | -0.54 | -£0.05 | N/A |
| PLZL.IL | £19,650.50 | +4.07% | 25.7T | 3429.41 | £5.73 | N/A |
| 0R4M.L | £507.55 | -0.29% | 122.4B | 757.53 | £0.67 | +0.32% |
| 0QYZ.L | £229.66 | -0.52% | 44.2B | 45.76 | £5.02 | +0.62% |
| 0R28.L | £52.11 | N/A | 42.3B | 39.39 | £1.32 | +1.70% |
| WPM.L | £6,750.00 | +0.45% | 30.6B | 67.50 | £1.00 | +0.72% |
| EDV.L | £2,320.00 | -0.09% | 5.6B | -74.84 | -£0.31 | +2.42% |
| AUY.L | £475.00 | +1.06% | 4.6B | -5.72 | -£0.83 | N/A |
| GGP.L | £17.00 | -1.64% | 2.2B | -17.00 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| CEY.L | £146.00 | N/A | 1.7B | 24.33 | £0.06 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
HUM.L vs PLZL.IL Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, PLZL.IL has a market cap of 25.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while PLZL.IL trades at £19,650.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PLZL.IL's P/E ratio is 3429.41. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PLZL.IL's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to PLZL.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs 0R4M.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, 0R4M.L has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while 0R4M.L trades at £507.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas 0R4M.L's P/E ratio is 757.53. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to 0R4M.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to 0R4M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs 0QYZ.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, 0QYZ.L has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while 0QYZ.L trades at £229.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas 0QYZ.L's P/E ratio is 45.76. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to 0QYZ.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to 0QYZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs 0R28.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, 0R28.L has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while 0R28.L trades at £52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas 0R28.L's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to 0R28.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to 0R28.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs WPM.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, WPM.L has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while WPM.L trades at £6,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas WPM.L's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WPM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to WPM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs EDV.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, EDV.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while EDV.L trades at £2,320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas EDV.L's P/E ratio is -74.84. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EDV.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to EDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs AUY.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, AUY.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while AUY.L trades at £475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AUY.L's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUY.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to AUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs GGP.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, GGP.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while GGP.L trades at £17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GGP.L's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GGP.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to GGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs CEY.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, CEY.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while CEY.L trades at £146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CEY.L's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CEY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to CEY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs HOC.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, HOC.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while HOC.L trades at £250.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HOC.L's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HOC.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to HOC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs PAF.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, PAF.L has a market cap of 979.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while PAF.L trades at £48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PAF.L's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PAF.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to PAF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs RSG.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, RSG.L has a market cap of 668.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while RSG.L trades at £31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas RSG.L's P/E ratio is -31.40. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to RSG.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to RSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs AMRQ.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, AMRQ.L has a market cap of 334.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while AMRQ.L trades at £83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AMRQ.L's P/E ratio is -27.83. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AMRQ.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to AMRQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs THX.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, THX.L has a market cap of 285.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while THX.L trades at £43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas THX.L's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to THX.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to THX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs MTL.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, MTL.L has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while MTL.L trades at £9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MTL.L's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MTL.L's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to MTL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs CMCL.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, CMCL.L has a market cap of 275M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while CMCL.L trades at £1,425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CMCL.L's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CMCL.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to CMCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs AAZ.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, AAZ.L has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while AAZ.L trades at £168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AAZ.L's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AAZ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to AAZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs SRB.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, SRB.L has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while SRB.L trades at £185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SRB.L's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SRB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to SRB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs SHG.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, SHG.L has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while SHG.L trades at £14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SHG.L's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SHG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to SHG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs ALTN.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, ALTN.L has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while ALTN.L trades at £465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ALTN.L's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALTN.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to ALTN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs CNR.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, CNR.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while CNR.L trades at £32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CNR.L's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to CNR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs KEFI.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, KEFI.L has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while KEFI.L trades at £0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas KEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KEFI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to KEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs CORA.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, CORA.L has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while CORA.L trades at £7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CORA.L's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CORA.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to CORA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs PAT.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, PAT.L has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while PAT.L trades at £12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PAT.L's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PAT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to PAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs OMI.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, OMI.L has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while OMI.L trades at £8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas OMI.L's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to OMI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to OMI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs AAU.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, AAU.L has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while AAU.L trades at £1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to AAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs LEX.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, LEX.L has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while LEX.L trades at £3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas LEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LEX.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to LEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs 0UH8.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, 0UH8.L has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while 0UH8.L trades at £0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas 0UH8.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to 0UH8.L's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to 0UH8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs GDP.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, GDP.L has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while GDP.L trades at £6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GDP.L's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GDP.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to GDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs SGZ.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, SGZ.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while SGZ.L trades at £12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SGZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SGZ.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to SGZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs 0VLY.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, 0VLY.L has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while 0VLY.L trades at £0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas 0VLY.L's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to 0VLY.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to 0VLY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs ORR.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, ORR.L has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while ORR.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ORR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ORR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to ORR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs XTR.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, XTR.L has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while XTR.L trades at £0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas XTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XTR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to XTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs GCAT.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, GCAT.L has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while GCAT.L trades at £0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GCAT.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GCAT.L's ROE of +5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to GCAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs GRL.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, GRL.L has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while GRL.L trades at £0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GRL.L's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GRL.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to GRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs CNG.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, CNG.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while CNG.L trades at £1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CNG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNG.L's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to CNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs GAL.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, GAL.L has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while GAL.L trades at £3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GAL.L's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GAL.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to GAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs ECR.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, ECR.L has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while ECR.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ECR.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ECR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to ECR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs PALM.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, PALM.L has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while PALM.L trades at £54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PALM.L's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PALM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to PALM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs 0V2Y.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, 0V2Y.L has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while 0V2Y.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas 0V2Y.L's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to 0V2Y.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to 0V2Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs WSBN.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, WSBN.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while WSBN.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas WSBN.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WSBN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to WSBN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs CGNR.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, CGNR.L has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while CGNR.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CGNR.L's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CGNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to CGNR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs HAMA.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, HAMA.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while HAMA.L trades at £0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HAMA.L's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HAMA.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to HAMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs 0V9B.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, 0V9B.L has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while 0V9B.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas 0V9B.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to 0V9B.L's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to 0V9B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs CGH.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, CGH.L has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while CGH.L trades at £0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CGH.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CGH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to CGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs KAT.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, KAT.L has a market cap of 947.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while KAT.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas KAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KAT.L's ROE of +11.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to KAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs POG.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, POG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while POG.L trades at £1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas POG.L's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to POG.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is less volatile compared to POG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs PUR.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, PUR.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while PUR.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PUR.L's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to PUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.
HUM.L vs AEXG.L Comparison
HUM.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUM.L stands at 46M. In comparison, AEXG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUM.L is priced at £2.70, while AEXG.L trades at £40.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUM.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AEXG.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HUM.L's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AEXG.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUM.L is more volatile compared to AEXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUM.L.