Helios Towers plc
Helios Towers plc (HTWS.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HTWS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTWS.L | £134.00 | +5.35% | 1.4B | 22.63 | £0.06 | N/A |
| 0R15.L | £16,300.00 | +6.36% | 23.2T | N/A | N/A | +0.27% |
| 0R2L.L | £250.49 | -2.75% | 281.9B | 111.83 | £2.24 | +1.31% |
| 0LQQ.L | £11.88 | +0.34% | 28.7B | 15.84 | £0.75 | +3.87% |
| VOD.L | £87.90 | -0.66% | 21.4B | -6.33 | -£0.14 | +3.99% |
| BT-A.L | £215.40 | +1.60% | 20.8B | 19.37 | £0.11 | +3.83% |
| SKMD.IL | £19.91 | -1.04% | 12.8B | 10.42 | £1.91 | N/A |
| 0XHR.L | £15.91 | +1.31% | 12B | 0.68 | £23.52 | N/A |
| ZEG.L | £1,165.00 | +4.02% | 8.8B | 128.33 | £0.09 | N/A |
| SKMD.L | £22.10 | -1.60% | 8.7B | 11.57 | £1.91 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HTWS.L vs 0R15.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0R15.L has a market cap of 23.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0R15.L trades at £16,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0R15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0R15.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to 0R15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0R15.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0R2L.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0R2L.L has a market cap of 281.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0R2L.L trades at £250.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0R2L.L's P/E ratio is 111.83. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0R2L.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to 0R2L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0R2L.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0LQQ.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0LQQ.L has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0LQQ.L trades at £11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0LQQ.L's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0LQQ.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to 0LQQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0LQQ.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs VOD.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VOD.L has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while VOD.L trades at £87.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas VOD.L's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to VOD.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to VOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check VOD.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs BT-A.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BT-A.L has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while BT-A.L trades at £215.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas BT-A.L's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BT-A.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to BT-A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check BT-A.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs SKMD.IL Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SKMD.IL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while SKMD.IL trades at £19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas SKMD.IL's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SKMD.IL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to SKMD.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check SKMD.IL's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0XHR.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0XHR.L has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0XHR.L trades at £15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0XHR.L's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0XHR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HTWS.L has daily volatility of 2.39 and 0XHR.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0XHR.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs ZEG.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZEG.L has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while ZEG.L trades at £1,165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas ZEG.L's P/E ratio is 128.33. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ZEG.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is less volatile compared to ZEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check ZEG.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs SKMD.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SKMD.L has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while SKMD.L trades at £22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas SKMD.L's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SKMD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is less volatile compared to SKMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check SKMD.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs AAF.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AAF.L has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while AAF.L trades at £216.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas AAF.L's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AAF.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to AAF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check AAF.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0QAL.IL Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0QAL.IL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0QAL.IL trades at £2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0QAL.IL's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0QAL.IL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to 0QAL.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0QAL.IL's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0HVP.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0HVP.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0HVP.L trades at £4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0HVP.L's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0HVP.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is less volatile compared to 0HVP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0HVP.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0JDO.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0JDO.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0JDO.L trades at £24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0JDO.L's P/E ratio is -2489.24. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0JDO.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to 0JDO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0JDO.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs RKMD.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RKMD.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while RKMD.L trades at £4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas RKMD.L's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to RKMD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to RKMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check RKMD.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0MDS.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0MDS.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0MDS.L trades at £8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0MDS.L's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0MDS.L's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is less volatile compared to 0MDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0MDS.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0IYQ.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0IYQ.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0IYQ.L trades at £11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0IYQ.L's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0IYQ.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to 0IYQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0IYQ.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs GAMA.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GAMA.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while GAMA.L trades at £1,086.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas GAMA.L's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to GAMA.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to GAMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check GAMA.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs OIH.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OIH.L has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while OIH.L trades at £0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas OIH.L's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to OIH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to OIH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check OIH.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs 0FQ8.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0FQ8.L has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while 0FQ8.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas 0FQ8.L's P/E ratio is -21.13. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to 0FQ8.L's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is less volatile compared to 0FQ8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check 0FQ8.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs ADT.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADT.L has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while ADT.L trades at £200.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas ADT.L's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ADT.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to ADT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check ADT.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs MAI.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MAI.L has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while MAI.L trades at £185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas MAI.L's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to MAI.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to MAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check MAI.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs BBB.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BBB.L has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while BBB.L trades at £20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas BBB.L's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BBB.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is less volatile compared to BBB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check BBB.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs TOOP.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TOOP.L has a market cap of 431K. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while TOOP.L trades at £0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas TOOP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TOOP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to TOOP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check TOOP.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs ORNT.L Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ORNT.L has a market cap of 350K. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while ORNT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas ORNT.L's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ORNT.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is more volatile compared to ORNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check ORNT.L's competition here
HTWS.L vs SSA.IL Comparison August 2025
HTWS.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTWS.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SSA.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTWS.L is priced at £134.00, while SSA.IL trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTWS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.63, whereas SSA.IL's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, HTWS.L's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SSA.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HTWS.L is less volatile compared to SSA.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTWS.L.Check SSA.IL's competition here