Haitong Securities Co., Ltd.
Haitong Securities Co., Ltd. (HTNGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HTNGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTNGF | $0.52 | +0.00% | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +0.89% |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 113.5B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.5B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +0.53% |
| CIIHY | $40.00 | +0.00% | 65.1B | 19.05 | $2.10 | +1.81% |
| CIIHF | $4.09 | +0.00% | 60.7B | 19.48 | $0.21 | +1.78% |
| MQBKY | $146.66 | +0.25% | 56.3B | 20.35 | $7.18 | +2.82% |
| MCQEF | $141.94 | -0.98% | 51.8B | 19.74 | $7.19 | +3.41% |
| GUOSF | $2.00 | +0.00% | 50.1B | 6.25 | $0.32 | +3.10% |
| NRSCF | $7.43 | +3.92% | 21.9B | 8.95 | $0.83 | +5.23% |
| CNICF | $2.35 | +0.00% | 21.4B | 16.79 | $0.14 | +1.07% |
Stock Comparison
HTNGF vs IBKKF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 113.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check IBKKF's competition here
HTNGF vs HAITY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAITY's competition here
HTNGF vs CIIHY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CIIHY trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CIIHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIIHY's competition here
HTNGF vs CIIHF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CIIHF trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CIIHF's competition here
HTNGF vs MQBKY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while MQBKY trades at $146.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check MQBKY's competition here
HTNGF vs MCQEF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while MCQEF trades at $141.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and MCQEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCQEF's competition here
HTNGF vs GUOSF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while GUOSF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and GUOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUOSF's competition here
HTNGF vs NRSCF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while NRSCF trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check NRSCF's competition here
HTNGF vs CNICF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CNICF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CNICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNICF's competition here
HTNGF vs HUATF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while HUATF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and HUATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUATF's competition here
HTNGF vs CGXYY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CGXYY trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 379.00. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CGXYY's competition here
HTNGF vs CMSQF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CMSQF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CMSQF's competition here
HTNGF vs CMSQY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CMSQY trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CMSQY's competition here
HTNGF vs DSEEY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while DSEEY trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check DSEEY's competition here
HTNGF vs DSECF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while DSECF trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check DSECF's competition here
HTNGF vs WSOUF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check WSOUF's competition here
HTNGF vs BRPHF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check BRPHF's competition here
HTNGF vs IVTJF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check IVTJF's competition here
HTNGF vs IGGRF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while IGGRF trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check IGGRF's competition here
HTNGF vs IGGHY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while IGGHY trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and IGGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGGHY's competition here
HTNGF vs IVTJY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check IVTJY's competition here
HTNGF vs CLPE Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CLPE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPE's competition here
HTNGF vs FNNTF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while FNNTF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check FNNTF's competition here
HTNGF vs TCAPF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while TCAPF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check TCAPF's competition here
HTNGF vs LTSAP Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while LTSAP trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check LTSAP's competition here
HTNGF vs MAUSY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while MAUSY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check MAUSY's competition here
HTNGF vs PLSQF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLSQF's competition here
HTNGF vs LTSA Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check LTSA's competition here
HTNGF vs NHMAF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and NHMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHMAF's competition here
HTNGF vs MNXBF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while MNXBF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check MNXBF's competition here
HTNGF vs DEFTF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check DEFTF's competition here
HTNGF vs CFNCF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CFNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFNCF's competition here
HTNGF vs CBGPY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CBGPY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CBGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBGPY's competition here
HTNGF vs CBGPF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 836.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CBGPF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CBGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBGPF's competition here
HTNGF vs CCORF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 759.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CCORF trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CCORF's competition here
HTNGF vs LKADF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and LKADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKADF's competition here
HTNGF vs PHIG Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 753.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while PHIG trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and PHIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHIG's competition here
HTNGF vs PHIGW Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 729.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check PHIGW's competition here
HTNGF vs CNSRF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 692.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CNSRF trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CNSRF's competition here
HTNGF vs NAGGF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check NAGGF's competition here
HTNGF vs CSCHF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 377.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CSCHF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -13.16. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CSCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSCHF's competition here
HTNGF vs ABGSF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 341.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while ABGSF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and ABGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABGSF's competition here
HTNGF vs CESTY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CESTY's competition here
HTNGF vs CESTF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CESTF's competition here
HTNGF vs OSHDF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check OSHDF's competition here
HTNGF vs APPCF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while APPCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check APPCF's competition here
HTNGF vs CYFRF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CYFRF trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 121.33. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CYFRF's competition here
HTNGF vs OZFRY Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 127.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while OZFRY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and OZFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OZFRY's competition here
HTNGF vs CAGPF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CAGPF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is 68.33. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CAGPF's competition here
HTNGF vs STGC Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check STGC's competition here
HTNGF vs NPPTF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while NPPTF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is -76.90. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check NPPTF's competition here
HTNGF vs CURN Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CURN trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CURN's competition here
HTNGF vs PNPFF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while PNPFF trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and PNPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNPFF's competition here
HTNGF vs XAUMF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while XAUMF trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check XAUMF's competition here
HTNGF vs ABIT Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while ABIT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check ABIT's competition here
HTNGF vs ARCNF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while ARCNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check ARCNF's competition here
HTNGF vs GEVI Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while GEVI trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -8.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check GEVI's competition here
HTNGF vs DGTLF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while DGTLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check DGTLF's competition here
HTNGF vs HAFG Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while HAFG trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and HAFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAFG's competition here
HTNGF vs UFFRF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UFFRF's competition here
HTNGF vs FDCT Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while FDCT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check FDCT's competition here
HTNGF vs CBTTF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CBTTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CBTTF's competition here
HTNGF vs DMGGF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while DMGGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check DMGGF's competition here
HTNGF vs BULT Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BULT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check BULT's competition here
HTNGF vs CMZZF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMZZF's competition here
HTNGF vs BBKCF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BBKCF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check BBKCF's competition here
HTNGF vs DBKSF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while DBKSF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check DBKSF's competition here
HTNGF vs CFLSF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CFLSF's competition here
HTNGF vs EBML Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check EBML's competition here
HTNGF vs CRMZ Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CRMZ trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CRMZ's competition here
HTNGF vs SMURF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check SMURF's competition here
HTNGF vs ARBKF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check ARBKF's competition here
HTNGF vs FWAV Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +7.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FWAV's competition here
HTNGF vs DYNA Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and DYNA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DYNA's competition here
HTNGF vs HYHDF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while HYHDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check HYHDF's competition here
HTNGF vs BCNWF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BCNWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check BCNWF's competition here
HTNGF vs IHLDF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while IHLDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and IHLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IHLDF's competition here
HTNGF vs AVFCF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while AVFCF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check AVFCF's competition here
HTNGF vs MATEF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while MATEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check MATEF's competition here
HTNGF vs BZRD Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check BZRD's competition here
HTNGF vs DPXCF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check DPXCF's competition here
HTNGF vs TRAA Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check TRAA's competition here
HTNGF vs FFTTF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check FFTTF's competition here
HTNGF vs BLVDF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check BLVDF's competition here
HTNGF vs HIPH Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and HIPH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HIPH's competition here
HTNGF vs ABSOF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while ABSOF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check ABSOF's competition here
HTNGF vs ITEX Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while ITEX trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check ITEX's competition here
HTNGF vs BTCWF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BTCWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check BTCWF's competition here
HTNGF vs CCPUF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CCPUF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and CCPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCPUF's competition here
HTNGF vs AAMTF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while AAMTF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check AAMTF's competition here
HTNGF vs PHIL Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check PHIL's competition here
HTNGF vs CSTXF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CSTXF's competition here
HTNGF vs CRKR Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check CRKR's competition here
HTNGF vs BKBLF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check BKBLF's competition here
HTNGF vs BIDCF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while BIDCF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and BIDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIDCF's competition here
HTNGF vs GBCHF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +32506.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check GBCHF's competition here
HTNGF vs PIHG Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while PIHG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and PIHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIHG's competition here
HTNGF vs GRNBF Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while GRNBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF and GRNBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRNBF's competition here
HTNGF vs FNDM Comparison August 2025
HTNGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTNGF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTNGF is priced at $0.52, while FNDM trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTNGF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.04, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTNGF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HTNGF is less volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTNGF.Check FNDM's competition here