Haier Smart Home Co., Ltd.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, QIHCF has a market cap of 31.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while QIHCF trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas QIHCF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QIHCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and QIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, HSHCY has a market cap of 30.60B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while HSHCY trades at $11.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HSHCY's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HSHCY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to HSHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.68B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while TPX trades at $65.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 12.95B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while SN trades at $92.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, RINIY has a market cap of 8.27B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while RINIY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas RINIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RINIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to RINIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, HWDJY has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while HWDJY trades at $52.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HWDJY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HWDJY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to HWDJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while MHK trades at $106.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, BVILY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while BVILY trades at $43.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas BVILY's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BVILY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to BVILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, HWDJF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while HWDJF trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HWDJF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HWDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to HWDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, HISEF has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while HISEF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HISEF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HISEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to HISEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, SEBYF has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while SEBYF trades at $82.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SEBYF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEBYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and SEBYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while WHR trades at $80.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 615.69. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, RINIF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while RINIF trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas RINIF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RINIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to RINIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, BVILF has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while BVILF trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas BVILF's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BVILF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and BVILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while PATK trades at $82.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, MAWHY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while MAWHY trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MAWHY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAWHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and MAWHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, ACKAY has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while ACKAY trades at $17.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ACKAY's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACKAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to ACKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, MAWHF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while MAWHF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MAWHF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAWHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to MAWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, ELUXY has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while ELUXY trades at $12.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ELUXY's P/E ratio is -127.90. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELUXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to ELUXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while LZB trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, ELRXF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while ELRXF trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ELRXF's P/E ratio is -125.60. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to ELRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while LEG trades at $9.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, RHUHF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while RHUHF trades at $22.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas RHUHF's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RHUHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to RHUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while MBC trades at $9.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while TILE trades at $20.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while MLKN trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 39.02. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 869.61M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while AMWD trades at $58.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, JGLCF has a market cap of 770.86M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while JGLCF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas JGLCF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JGLCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to JGLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 663.21M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while ETD trades at $26.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, CFSKF has a market cap of 647.44M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while CFSKF trades at $19.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas CFSKF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CFSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to CFSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, RYLHF has a market cap of 576.88M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while RYLHF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas RYLHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RYLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and RYLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, VLBOF has a market cap of 533.90M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while VLBOF trades at $26.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas VLBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and VLBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, SEBYY has a market cap of 524.59M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while SEBYY trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SEBYY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEBYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to SEBYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 298.39M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while LOVE trades at $20.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 200.34M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while HBB trades at $14.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 187.93M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while COOK trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 181.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while SNBR trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 165.05M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while FLXS trades at $31.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 153.37M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while BSET trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 141.08M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while VIRC trades at $8.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, WTWGF has a market cap of 131.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while WTWGF trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WTWGF's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WTWGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to WTWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, VCCTF has a market cap of 120.01M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while VCCTF trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas VCCTF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VCCTF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to VCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, WKGBF has a market cap of 104.03M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while WKGBF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WKGBF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WKGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and WKGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 100.71M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while KEQU trades at $35.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 98.89M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while HOFT trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 85.45M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while PRPL trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, IPGGF has a market cap of 81.74M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while IPGGF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas IPGGF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IPGGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to IPGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 79.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while IRBT trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 72.40M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while LCUT trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 38.80M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while NCL trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCL's ROE of -4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, DIIBF has a market cap of 38.77M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while DIIBF trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas DIIBF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIIBF's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to DIIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 32.01M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while CRWS trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 30.01M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while VIOT trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, RGBD has a market cap of 26.45M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while RGBD trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas RGBD's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGBD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to RGBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 17.76M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while ATER trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 14.00M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while NVFY trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 8.70M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while EFOI trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 8.15M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while NTZ trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 7.39M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while FGI trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, DGIX has a market cap of 6.21M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while DGIX trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas DGIX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DGIX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to DGIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, LUVU has a market cap of 3.45M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while LUVU trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas LUVU's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUVU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to LUVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while AUVI trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 431620.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while FGIWW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, KMFI has a market cap of 197266.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while KMFI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas KMFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to KMFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, ROWC has a market cap of 3985.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while ROWC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ROWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROWC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and ROWC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, DIAAF has a market cap of 3692.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while DIAAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas DIAAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIAAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and DIAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, DEER has a market cap of 3359.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while DEER trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas DEER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DEER's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and DEER have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, THBD has a market cap of 1134.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while THBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas THBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THBD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and THBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, PWNX has a market cap of 677.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while PWNX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PWNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to PWNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, VUOC has a market cap of 570.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while VUOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas VUOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VUOC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and VUOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, PFWIQ has a market cap of 506.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while PFWIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PFWIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PFWIQ's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and PFWIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, FTDL has a market cap of 478.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while FTDL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas FTDL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to FTDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, AUVIQ has a market cap of 467.00. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while AUVIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AUVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUVIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and AUVIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, ICPBF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while ICPBF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ICPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ICPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF and ICPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, KBAL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while KBAL trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.

HRSHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRSHF stands at 28.45B. In comparison, WEBR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HRSHF is priced at $2.72, while WEBR trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HRSHF is less volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRSHF.