L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

HRS.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRS.DE stands at 42.85B. In comparison, PAE.DE has a market cap of 51.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HRS.DE is priced at $225.90, while PAE.DE trades at $98.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas PAE.DE's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, HRS.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAE.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HRS.DE is less volatile compared to PAE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRS.DE.

HRS.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRS.DE stands at 42.85B. In comparison, SWF.DE has a market cap of 12.71B. Regarding current trading prices, HRS.DE is priced at $225.90, while SWF.DE trades at $82.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas SWF.DE's P/E ratio is -121.41. In terms of profitability, HRS.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWF.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HRS.DE is less volatile compared to SWF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRS.DE.

HRS.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRS.DE stands at 42.85B. In comparison, AGJ.DE has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HRS.DE is priced at $225.90, while AGJ.DE trades at $89.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas AGJ.DE's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, HRS.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGJ.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRS.DE is more volatile compared to AGJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRS.DE.

HRS.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRS.DE stands at 42.85B. In comparison, WB2.DE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HRS.DE is priced at $225.90, while WB2.DE trades at $93.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas WB2.DE's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, HRS.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WB2.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRS.DE is less volatile compared to WB2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRS.DE.

HRS.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HRS.DE stands at 42.85B. In comparison, F03.DE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HRS.DE is priced at $225.90, while F03.DE trades at $76.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HRS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 39.49, whereas F03.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRS.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to F03.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRS.DE is more volatile compared to F03.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRS.DE.