Hydro One Limited
Hydro One Limited HRNNF Peers
See (HRNNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRNNF | $35.55 | -0.50% | 21.3B | 24.02 | $1.48 | +3.09% |
| NGGTF | $14.79 | -2.91% | 71.7B | 18.06 | $0.81 | +4.20% |
| ELEZY | $15.68 | -1.51% | 33.8B | 13.40 | $1.19 | +2.94% |
| ELEZF | $31.02 | +0.00% | 29.1B | 11.65 | $2.36 | +4.63% |
| NSARO | $76.60 | +0.00% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.11% |
| NSARP | $69.00 | -2.82% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.12% |
| CLPHY | $8.31 | -1.89% | 21.6B | 14.46 | $0.59 | +4.44% |
| CLPHF | $8.41 | +0.00% | 21.4B | 14.37 | $0.59 | +4.77% |
| TEZNY | $30.49 | -1.15% | 20.7B | 17.30 | $1.79 | +2.77% |
| TNABY | $13.17 | +0.04% | 20.6B | 17.47 | $0.81 | +3.30% |
Stock Comparison
HRNNF vs NGGTF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while NGGTF trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs ELEZY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while ELEZY trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs ELEZF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while ELEZF trades at $31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs NSARO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while NSARO trades at $76.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs NSARP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while NSARP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CLPHY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CLPHY trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CLPHF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CLPHF trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs TEZNY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while TEZNY trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs TNABY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while TNABY trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs TERRF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while TERRF trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs TNABF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while TNABF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs AILIO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while AILIO trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CKISF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CKISF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CKISY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CKISY trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs EMRAF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while EMRAF trades at $45.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs RDEIY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while RDEIY trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs ELIAF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs UEPCO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while UEPCO trades at $97.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs MAEOY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while MAEOY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs EQUEY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while EQUEY trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HPIFF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs FTRSF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while FTRSF trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs UEPCN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs UEPEP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while UEPEP trades at $73.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs FORFF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while FORFF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs UEPEO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while UEPEO trades at $71.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs UEPCP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while UEPCP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HPIFY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs EGIEY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while EGIEY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs UEPEM Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while UEPEM trades at $65.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs UEPEN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while UEPEN trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HKVTY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HKVTY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HKCVF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CPWIF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs IESFY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while IESFY trades at $116.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs ABZPF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while ABZPF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs ABOIF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while ABOIF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs WELPM Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs PGPKY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while PGPKY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs WELPP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while WELPP trades at $64.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs AILLM Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while AILLM trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs AILLN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while AILLN trades at $76.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs AILIN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while AILIN trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs AILLP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while AILLP trades at $65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs RGPCF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs FPHHF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CUPUF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 556.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CUPUF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs RELFF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs ABTZY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while ABTZY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNLPL Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNLPL trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNTHP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNTHP trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs ABZPY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNTHO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNTHO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNTHN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNTHN trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNLHP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNLHP trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNLTP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNLTP trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNLHO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNLHO trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNLPM Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNLPM trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNLTN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNLTN trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNLHN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNLHN trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs CNLTL Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while CNLTL trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs EDCFF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs NZWFF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs SUME Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while SUME trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs EUSP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while EUSP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs MCPB Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HAWEL Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 774.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HAWEL trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HAWLI Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 737.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HAWLI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HAWLM Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 725K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HAWLM trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HAWLN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 725K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HAWLN trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HAWEM Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 724.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HAWEM trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HAWLL Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 723.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HAWLL trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs HAWEN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 700.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while HAWEN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs RIGH Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs USWF Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs EPGRQ Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs RENU Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs IPWLP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs BANGN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs IPWLG Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs AILIP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while AILIP trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs PNMXO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while PNMXO trades at $75.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs NMPWP Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while NMPWP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs IPWLO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs ENIAY Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs EVSO Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs NEWEN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while NEWEN trades at $96.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.
HRNNF vs IPWLN Comparison
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.55, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.02, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.