Hydro One Limited
Hydro One Limited (HRNNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HRNNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRNNF | $42.27 | +2.18% | 25.2B | 25.77 | $1.63 | +2.24% |
| NGGTF | $18.72 | +4.62% | 93.1B | 23.11 | $0.81 | +3.36% |
| ELEZY | $20.00 | +4.49% | 42.5B | 16.58 | $1.23 | +3.27% |
| ELEZF | $40.00 | +12.83% | 41.7B | 16.33 | $2.45 | +3.57% |
| NSARO | $83.00 | -2.35% | 30.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.76% |
| NSARP | $71.90 | -0.14% | 29.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.76% |
| AILIO | $69.89 | +1.14% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.56% |
| AILIP | $66.98 | -0.81% | 25.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.56% |
| CLPHY | $9.92 | -0.55% | 25B | 17.09 | $0.58 | +3.74% |
| TERRF | $12.06 | +9.34% | 24.2B | 18.84 | $0.64 | +3.82% |
Stock Comparison
HRNNF vs NGGTF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while NGGTF trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check NGGTF's competition here
HRNNF vs ELEZY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ELEZY trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ELEZY's competition here
HRNNF vs ELEZF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ELEZF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ELEZF's competition here
HRNNF vs NSARO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while NSARO trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check NSARO's competition here
HRNNF vs NSARP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while NSARP trades at $71.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check NSARP's competition here
HRNNF vs AILIO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while AILIO trades at $69.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check AILIO's competition here
HRNNF vs AILIP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while AILIP trades at $66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check AILIP's competition here
HRNNF vs CLPHY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CLPHY trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CLPHY's competition here
HRNNF vs TERRF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while TERRF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check TERRF's competition here
HRNNF vs CLPHF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CLPHF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CLPHF's competition here
HRNNF vs TEZNY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while TEZNY trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check TEZNY's competition here
HRNNF vs TNABF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while TNABF trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check TNABF's competition here
HRNNF vs CKISY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CKISY trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CKISY's competition here
HRNNF vs TNABY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while TNABY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check TNABY's competition here
HRNNF vs CKISF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CKISF trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CKISF's competition here
HRNNF vs ELIAF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ELIAF trades at $142.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ELIAF's competition here
HRNNF vs EMRAF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EMRAF's competition here
HRNNF vs MAEOY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while MAEOY trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check MAEOY's competition here
HRNNF vs ENEAY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ENEAY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ENEAY trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ENEAY's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENEAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ENEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ENEAY's competition here
HRNNF vs EQUEY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while EQUEY trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EQUEY's competition here
HRNNF vs RDEIY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while RDEIY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RDEIY's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPCO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while UEPCO trades at $98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check UEPCO's competition here
HRNNF vs FTRSF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while FTRSF trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check FTRSF's competition here
HRNNF vs FORFF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while FORFF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check FORFF's competition here
HRNNF vs IESFY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while IESFY trades at $194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check IESFY's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPCN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while UEPCN trades at $77.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check UEPCN's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPEP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while UEPEP trades at $74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check UEPEP's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPEO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while UEPEO trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check UEPEO's competition here
HRNNF vs HPIFF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HPIFF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HPIFF's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPCP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while UEPCP trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check UEPCP's competition here
HRNNF vs HKVTY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HKVTY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HKVTY's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPEM Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while UEPEM trades at $65.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check UEPEM's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPEN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while UEPEN trades at $62.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check UEPEN's competition here
HRNNF vs HPIFY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HPIFY trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HPIFY's competition here
HRNNF vs HKCVF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HKCVF's competition here
HRNNF vs EGIEY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while EGIEY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EGIEY's competition here
HRNNF vs CPWIF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CPWIF's competition here
HRNNF vs ABZPF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ABZPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ABZPF's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWEM Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HAWEM trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWEM's competition here
HRNNF vs WELPM Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while WELPM trades at $107.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check WELPM's competition here
HRNNF vs ABOIF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ABOIF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ABOIF's competition here
HRNNF vs PGPKY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while PGPKY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check PGPKY's competition here
HRNNF vs WELPP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while WELPP trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check WELPP's competition here
HRNNF vs AILLM Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while AILLM trades at $81.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check AILLM's competition here
HRNNF vs AILLN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while AILLN trades at $79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check AILLN's competition here
HRNNF vs AILIN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while AILIN trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check AILIN's competition here
HRNNF vs AILLP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while AILLP trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check AILLP's competition here
HRNNF vs RGPCF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RGPCF's competition here
HRNNF vs FPHHF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check FPHHF's competition here
HRNNF vs CUPUF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 567.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CUPUF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CUPUF's competition here
HRNNF vs RELFF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RELFF's competition here
HRNNF vs CNTHP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNTHP trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNTHP's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLPL Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 318.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNLPL trades at $52.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLPL's competition here
HRNNF vs CNTHO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNTHO trades at $46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNTHO's competition here
HRNNF vs ABTZY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ABTZY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ABTZY's competition here
HRNNF vs CNTHN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNTHN trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNTHN's competition here
HRNNF vs ABZPY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ABZPY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ABZPY's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLHO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNLHO trades at $37.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLHO's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLHP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNLHP trades at $37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLHP's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLTP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNLTP trades at $36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLTP's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLPM Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNLPM trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLPM's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLTN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNLTN trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLTN's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLHN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNLHN trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLHN's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLTL Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while CNLTL trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLTL's competition here
HRNNF vs EDCFF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EDCFF's competition here
HRNNF vs NZWFF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check NZWFF's competition here
HRNNF vs SUME Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while SUME trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUME's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check SUME's competition here
HRNNF vs EUSP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while EUSP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EUSP's competition here
HRNNF vs MCPB Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while MCPB trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check MCPB's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWEN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HAWEN trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWEN's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWLM Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HAWLM trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWLM's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWEL Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HAWEL trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWEL's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWLI Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HAWLI trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWLI's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWLL Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HAWLL trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWLL's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWLN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 999.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while HAWLN trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWLN's competition here
HRNNF vs RIGH Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RIGH's competition here
HRNNF vs USWF Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check USWF's competition here
HRNNF vs RENU Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RENU's competition here
HRNNF vs EPGRQ Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 15. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EPGRQ's competition here
HRNNF vs IPWLO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check IPWLO's competition here
HRNNF vs EVSO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EVSO's competition here
HRNNF vs IPWLG Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check IPWLG's competition here
HRNNF vs NMPWP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while NMPWP trades at $56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check NMPWP's competition here
HRNNF vs PNMXO Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while PNMXO trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check PNMXO's competition here
HRNNF vs NEWEN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while NEWEN trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check NEWEN's competition here
HRNNF vs ENIAY Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ENIAY's competition here
HRNNF vs IPWLN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check IPWLN's competition here
HRNNF vs IPWLP Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check IPWLP's competition here
HRNNF vs BANGN Comparison February 2026
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $42.27, while BANGN trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.77, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check BANGN's competition here