Hydro One Limited
Hydro One Limited (HRNNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HRNNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRNNF | $35.34 | -0.53% | 21.2B | 23.72 | $1.49 | +3.07% |
| NGGTF | $14.65 | +1.86% | 72.7B | 18.08 | $0.81 | +4.20% |
| ELEZF | $29.71 | -1.13% | 31.4B | 12.33 | $2.41 | +4.23% |
| ELEZY | $14.91 | -0.40% | 31.3B | 12.24 | $1.21 | +3.17% |
| NSARO | $78.00 | +1.30% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.21% |
| AILIO | $69.98 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| AILIP | $69.00 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| NSARP | $70.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.21% |
| CLPHY | $8.58 | +0.94% | 21.6B | 14.47 | $0.59 | +4.45% |
| CLPHF | $7.90 | +0.00% | 20B | 13.39 | $0.59 | +5.12% |
Stock Comparison
HRNNF vs NGGTF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while NGGTF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check NGGTF's competition here
HRNNF vs ELEZF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while ELEZF trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and ELEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELEZF's competition here
HRNNF vs ELEZY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while ELEZY trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ELEZY's competition here
HRNNF vs NSARO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while NSARO trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARO's competition here
HRNNF vs AILIO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while AILIO trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and AILIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIO's competition here
HRNNF vs AILIP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while AILIP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check AILIP's competition here
HRNNF vs NSARP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while NSARP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARP's competition here
HRNNF vs CLPHY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CLPHY trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CLPHY's competition here
HRNNF vs CLPHF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CLPHF trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPHF's competition here
HRNNF vs TNABF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while TNABF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and TNABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNABF's competition here
HRNNF vs TEZNY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while TEZNY trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check TEZNY's competition here
HRNNF vs TERRF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while TERRF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and TERRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TERRF's competition here
HRNNF vs TNABY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while TNABY trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check TNABY's competition here
HRNNF vs CKISF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CKISF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CKISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISF's competition here
HRNNF vs CKISY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CKISY trades at $30.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CKISY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISY's competition here
HRNNF vs EMRAF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EMRAF's competition here
HRNNF vs ELIAF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ELIAF's competition here
HRNNF vs RDEIY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while RDEIY trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RDEIY's competition here
HRNNF vs MAEOY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while MAEOY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check MAEOY's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPCO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while UEPCO trades at $91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and UEPCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCO's competition here
HRNNF vs FTRSF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while FTRSF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and FTRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTRSF's competition here
HRNNF vs EQUEY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while EQUEY trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EQUEY's competition here
HRNNF vs HPIFF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFF's competition here
HRNNF vs FORFF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while FORFF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and FORFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FORFF's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPCN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCN's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPEO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while UEPEO trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check UEPEO's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPEP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while UEPEP trades at $73.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and UEPEP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEP's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPCP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while UEPCP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and UEPCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCP's competition here
HRNNF vs HPIFY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HPIFY trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HPIFY's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPEM Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while UEPEM trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and UEPEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEM's competition here
HRNNF vs EGIEY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while EGIEY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EGIEY's competition here
HRNNF vs UEPEN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while UEPEN trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and UEPEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEN's competition here
HRNNF vs HKCVF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKCVF's competition here
HRNNF vs HKVTY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HKVTY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and HKVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKVTY's competition here
HRNNF vs CPWIF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CPWIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWIF's competition here
HRNNF vs IESFY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while IESFY trades at $119.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check IESFY's competition here
HRNNF vs ABZPF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and ABZPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABZPF's competition here
HRNNF vs ABOIF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and ABOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABOIF's competition here
HRNNF vs WELPM Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPM's competition here
HRNNF vs PGPKY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while PGPKY trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and PGPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGPKY's competition here
HRNNF vs WELPP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while WELPP trades at $65.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and WELPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPP's competition here
HRNNF vs AILLM Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while AILLM trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLM's competition here
HRNNF vs AILLN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while AILLN trades at $77.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and AILLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLN's competition here
HRNNF vs AILIN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while AILIN trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and AILIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIN's competition here
HRNNF vs RGPCF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RGPCF's competition here
HRNNF vs AILLP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while AILLP trades at $63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check AILLP's competition here
HRNNF vs FPHHF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPHHF's competition here
HRNNF vs CUPUF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 552.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CUPUF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUPUF's competition here
HRNNF vs RELFF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RELFF's competition here
HRNNF vs ABTZY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while ABTZY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABTZY's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLPL Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNLPL trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CNLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPL's competition here
HRNNF vs CNTHP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNTHP trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CNTHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHP's competition here
HRNNF vs CNTHO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNTHO trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CNTHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHO's competition here
HRNNF vs CNTHN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNTHN trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CNTHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHN's competition here
HRNNF vs ABZPY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while ABZPY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and ABZPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABZPY's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLHO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNLHO trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLHO's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLHP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNLHP trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CNLHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHP's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLTP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNLTP trades at $36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLTP's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLPM Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNLPM trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CNLPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPM's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLHN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNLHN trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check CNLHN's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLTN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 196.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNLTN trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CNLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTN's competition here
HRNNF vs CNLTL Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while CNLTL trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and CNLTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTL's competition here
HRNNF vs EDCFF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EDCFF's competition here
HRNNF vs NZWFF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZWFF's competition here
HRNNF vs SUME Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while SUME trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUME's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and SUME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUME's competition here
HRNNF vs MCPB Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while MCPB trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and MCPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCPB's competition here
HRNNF vs EUSP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while EUSP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and EUSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EUSP's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWLL Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 768.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HAWLL trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWLL's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWEN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 758.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HAWEN trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and HAWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWEN's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWEM Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 755.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWEM's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWLN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 755.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HAWLN trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWLN's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWLI Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 755.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HAWLI trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check HAWLI's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWLM Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 744K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HAWLM trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLM's competition here
HRNNF vs HAWEL Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 739.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while HAWEL trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and HAWEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWEL's competition here
HRNNF vs RIGH Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RIGH's competition here
HRNNF vs USWF Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USWF's competition here
HRNNF vs RENU Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while RENU trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check RENU's competition here
HRNNF vs EPGRQ Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 16. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and EPGRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPGRQ's competition here
HRNNF vs IPWLP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLP's competition here
HRNNF vs IPWLO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLO's competition here
HRNNF vs ENIAY Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check ENIAY's competition here
HRNNF vs BANGN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BANGN's competition here
HRNNF vs IPWLN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLN's competition here
HRNNF vs EVSO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRNNF.Check EVSO's competition here
HRNNF vs PNMXO Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while PNMXO trades at $75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and PNMXO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNMXO's competition here
HRNNF vs IPWLG Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLG's competition here
HRNNF vs NMPWP Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while NMPWP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and NMPWP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPWP's competition here
HRNNF vs NEWEN Comparison July 2025
HRNNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRNNF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRNNF is priced at $35.34, while NEWEN trades at $98.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRNNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.72, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRNNF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRNNF and NEWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWEN's competition here