Tekla Life Sciences Investors

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VOO trades at $590.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VOO's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VFINX trades at $595.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VFINX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VITSX trades at $153.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VITSX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VTSAX trades at $153.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VTSAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 680.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while FXAIX trades at $224.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check FXAIX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 655.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VTI trades at $316.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VTI's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 655.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while IVV trades at $645.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check IVV's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 589.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while SPY trades at $642.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check SPY's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 510.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VXUS trades at $71.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VXUS's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 505.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VTSNX trades at $152.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VTSNX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 354.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VMCPX trades at $385.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VMCPX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 325.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VIMAX trades at $353.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VIMAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VINIX trades at $524.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VINIX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VIIIX trades at $524.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VIIIX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 298.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RGAGX trades at $85.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RGAGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 297.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while GAFFX trades at $85.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check GAFFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 297.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AGTHX trades at $85.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AGTHX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 294.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while GFAFX trades at $84.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check GFAFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 263.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RGABX trades at $75.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RGABX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 259.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RGAAX trades at $74.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RGAAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 253.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while GFACX trades at $72.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check GFACX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while BALFX trades at $37.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check BALFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AFMBX trades at $37.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AFMBX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RLBGX trades at $37.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RLBGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AMBFX trades at $37.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AMBFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 252.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while ABALX trades at $37.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check ABALX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 232.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VEA trades at $58.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VEA's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 230.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VTMNX trades at $18.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VTMNX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 229.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VDIPX trades at $29.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VDIPX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 228B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while QQQ trades at $580.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check QQQ's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 216.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VB trades at $245.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VB's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 208.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while BX trades at $173.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 46.82. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check BX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 198.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VTV trades at $179.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VTV's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 194.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VO trades at $285.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VO's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 179.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while BLK trades at $1,159.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check BLK's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while C-PN trades at $29.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check C-PN's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 173.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while FCNKX trades at $24.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check FCNKX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 173B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while FCNTX trades at $24.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check FCNTX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while FCTDX trades at $18.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check FCTDX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RICAX trades at $64.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RICAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AIVSX trades at $65.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AIVSX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AICCX trades at $64.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AICCX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AICFX trades at $64.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AICFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 168.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RICBX trades at $64.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RICBX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while ANWPX trades at $71.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check ANWPX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while FNPFX trades at $71.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check FNPFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RNPGX trades at $71.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RNPGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while NPFFX trades at $70.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check NPFFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while CFNAX trades at $90.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check CFNAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 154B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AFIFX trades at $90.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AFIFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 154B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while ANCFX trades at $90.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check ANCFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 145.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AWSHX trades at $65.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AWSHX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RWMFX trades at $65.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RWMFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while FWMIX trades at $65.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check FWMIX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 144.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while CWMAX trades at $65.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check CWMAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while WSHFX trades at $65.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check WSHFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 142.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while IEFA trades at $85.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check IEFA's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 142.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while WSHCX trades at $64.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check WSHCX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RWMBX trades at $63.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RWMBX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while KKR trades at $147.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 69.12. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check KKR's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AEGFX trades at $61.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AEGFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AEPFX trades at $61.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AEPFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RERHX trades at $61.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RERHX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 130.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RERGX trades at $61.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RERGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AEPGX trades at $61.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AEPGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AGG trades at $99.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 126.26. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AGG's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while IWF trades at $450.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check IWF's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while JLGMX trades at $93.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check JLGMX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while SEEGX trades at $88.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check SEEGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while JLGRX trades at $92.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check JLGRX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VGT trades at $706.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 39.60. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VGT's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 115.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VWENX trades at $80.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VWENX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 115.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VWELX trades at $46.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VWELX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VITAX trades at $361.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VITAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while FSKAX trades at $177.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check FSKAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VUG trades at $462.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VUG's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VTTHX trades at $26.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VTTHX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VSCIX trades at $117.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VSCIX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while NAESX trades at $117.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check NAESX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VIG trades at $208.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VIG's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 109.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VDADX trades at $56.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VDADX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while BN trades at $65.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 149.01. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check BN's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while TBCIX trades at $212.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check TBCIX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while TRBCX trades at $210.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check TRBCX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VTHRX trades at $41.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VTHRX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while BAM trades at $62.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check BAM's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while PABGX trades at $203.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check PABGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VFORX trades at $48.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VFORX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VTIVX trades at $33.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VTIVX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while IJH trades at $63.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check IJH's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RRBGX trades at $189.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RRBGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while DODGX trades at $270.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check DODGX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while PRUFX trades at $117.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 41.28. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check PRUFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while PRGFX trades at $116.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 40.62. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check PRGFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while RAFFX trades at $47.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check RAFFX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VIEIX trades at $152.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VIEIX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while VEMAX trades at $42.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check VEMAX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while AMCPX trades at $45.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check AMCPX's competition here

HQL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HQL stands at 386.6M. In comparison, TRSAX has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HQL is priced at $13.36, while TRSAX trades at $111.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HQL currently has a P/E ratio of -27.90, whereas TRSAX's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, HQL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRSAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HQL is more volatile compared to TRSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HQL.Check TRSAX's competition here