Huadian Power International Corporation Limited
Huadian Power International Corporation Limited HPIFY Peers
See (HPIFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPIFY | $15.70 | +4.60% | 227.9B | 8.40 | $1.87 | +6.18% |
| NGGTF | $14.11 | -4.27% | 69.2B | 17.42 | $0.81 | +5.26% |
| ELEZY | $15.69 | +2.21% | 33.2B | 13.53 | $1.16 | +3.18% |
| ELEZF | $29.95 | -5.13% | 31.7B | 12.85 | $2.33 | +3.65% |
| NSARO | $79.00 | +0.01% | 29B | N/A | N/A | +6.05% |
| NSARP | $71.00 | N/A | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| HRNNF | $36.63 | -0.22% | 22B | 24.75 | $1.48 | +2.33% |
| CLPHF | $8.41 | -0.83% | 21.2B | 14.25 | $0.59 | +4.81% |
| CLPHY | $8.37 | +0.12% | 21.1B | 14.19 | $0.59 | +4.52% |
| TNABY | $14.09 | +17.42% | 20.5B | 17.40 | $0.81 | +3.31% |
Stock Comparison
HPIFY vs NGGTF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while NGGTF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs ELEZY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while ELEZY trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs ELEZF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while ELEZF trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs NSARO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while NSARO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs NSARP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while NSARP trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HRNNF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HRNNF trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CLPHF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CLPHF trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CLPHY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CLPHY trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs TNABY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while TNABY trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs TERRF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while TERRF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs TNABF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while TNABF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs MAEOY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs AILIO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while AILIO trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CKISF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CKISF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CKISY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CKISY trades at $31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs EMRAF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while EMRAF trades at $45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs ELIAF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs RDEIY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while RDEIY trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs UEPCO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while UEPCO trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs EQUEY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while EQUEY trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HPIFF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs FTRSF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs UEPCN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs UEPEP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while UEPEP trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs UEPEO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while UEPEO trades at $71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs UEPCP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while UEPCP trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs FORFF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while FORFF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs TEZNY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while TEZNY trades at $30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs UEPEM Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while UEPEM trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HKVTY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs UEPEN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while UEPEN trades at $61.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs EGIEY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while EGIEY trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HKCVF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CPWIF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs IESFY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while IESFY trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs ABOIF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs WELPM Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while WELPM trades at $110.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs RGPCF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs WELPP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while WELPP trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs AILLM Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while AILLM trades at $78.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs AILLN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while AILLN trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HAWLM Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HAWLM trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs AILIN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while AILIN trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs PGPKY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs AILLP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while AILLP trades at $63.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs FPHHF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CUPUF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CUPUF trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs RELFF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs ABTZY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 352.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while ABTZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNLPL Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNLPL trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNTHP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNTHP trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs ABZPF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNTHO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNTHO trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs ABZPY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HAWEL Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 240.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HAWEL trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNTHN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNTHN trades at $39.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNLHO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNLHO trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNLHP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNLHP trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HAWLN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HAWLN trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNLTP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNLTP trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNLPM Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNLTN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNLTN trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNLHN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNLHN trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HAWEN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HAWEN trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs CNLTL Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 188.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while CNLTL trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs EDCFF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs NZWFF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs SUME Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while SUME trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs EUSP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while EUSP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs MCPB Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HAWEM Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 742.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HAWEM trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs RIGH Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs USWF Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs EPGRQ Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs RENU Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs IPWLP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs IPWLG Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HAWLL Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HAWLL trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs HAWLI Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while HAWLI trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs BANGN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs NMPWP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while NMPWP trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs ENIAY Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs EVSO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs AILIP Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while AILIP trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs IPWLN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs NEWEN Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while NEWEN trades at $126.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs IPWLO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.
HPIFY vs PNMXO Comparison
HPIFY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HPIFY stands at 227.9B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HPIFY is priced at $15.70, while PNMXO trades at $74.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HPIFY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.40, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HPIFY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HPIFY is more volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HPIFY.