Immutable Holdings Inc.
Immutable Holdings Inc. (HOLD.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HOLD.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOLD.NE | CA$0.14 | -20.59% | 13.7M | -4.50 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| GS.NE | CA$34.82 | -1.64% | 305.6B | 15.27 | CA$2.28 | +1.70% |
| GLXY.TO | CA$37.08 | -5.65% | 14.3B | 48.80 | CA$0.76 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | CA$27.30 | -7.24% | 3.1B | -30.00 | -CA$0.91 | N/A |
| DEFI.NE | CA$3.71 | +0.27% | 1.2B | 72.80 | CA$0.05 | N/A |
| CF-PC.TO | CA$23.50 | -0.21% | 1.1B | 10.88 | CA$2.16 | +3.25% |
| CF.TO | CA$10.49 | -2.51% | 1.1B | -34.97 | -CA$0.30 | +3.25% |
| BITF.TO | CA$1.62 | -7.43% | 903.2M | -6.48 | -CA$0.25 | N/A |
| HODL.CN | CA$1.21 | -1.63% | 200.9M | 121.00 | CA$0.01 | N/A |
| PNP.TO | CA$15.68 | +1.42% | 147.2M | 4.72 | CA$3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HOLD.NE vs GS.NE Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 305.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while GS.NE trades at CA$34.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check GS.NE's competition here
HOLD.NE vs GLXY.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while GLXY.TO trades at CA$37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check GLXY.TO's competition here
HOLD.NE vs HUT.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while HUT.TO trades at CA$27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check HUT.TO's competition here
HOLD.NE vs DEFI.NE Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while DEFI.NE trades at CA$3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check DEFI.NE's competition here
HOLD.NE vs CF-PC.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CF-PC.TO trades at CA$23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check CF-PC.TO's competition here
HOLD.NE vs CF.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CF.TO trades at CA$10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -34.97. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check CF.TO's competition here
HOLD.NE vs BITF.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 903.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while BITF.TO trades at CA$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check BITF.TO's competition here
HOLD.NE vs HODL.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 200.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while HODL.CN trades at CA$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check HODL.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs PNP.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while PNP.TO trades at CA$15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check PNP.TO's competition here
HOLD.NE vs RICH.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while RICH.CN trades at CA$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to RICH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check RICH.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs CXI.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CXI.TO trades at CA$19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check CXI.TO's competition here
HOLD.NE vs XAU.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while XAU.TO trades at CA$8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check XAU.TO's competition here
HOLD.NE vs BIGG.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while BIGG.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check BIGG.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs SIX.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, SIX.CN has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SIX.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to SIX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check SIX.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs FRNT.V Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while FRNT.V trades at CA$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check FRNT.V's competition here
HOLD.NE vs DIGI.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, DIGI.CN has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while DIGI.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas DIGI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DIGI.CN's ROE of -4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to DIGI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check DIGI.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs BTC.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while BTC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -8.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check BTC.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs SPIR.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while SPIR.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +10.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check SPIR.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs ARM.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while ARM.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to ARM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check ARM.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs CODE.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while CODE.CN trades at CA$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to CODE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check CODE.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs GBC.CN Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while GBC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to GBC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check GBC.CN's competition here
HOLD.NE vs FXC.TO Comparison August 2025
HOLD.NE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLD.NE stands at 13.7M. In comparison, FXC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLD.NE is priced at CA$0.14, while FXC.TO trades at CA$5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLD.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, HOLD.NE's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLD.NE is more volatile compared to FXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLD.NE.Check FXC.TO's competition here