Cypherpunk Holdings Inc.
Cypherpunk Holdings Inc. HODL.CN Peers
See (HODL.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
HODL.CN vs GS.NE Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 242.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while GS.NE trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs GLXY.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while GLXY.TO trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is 35.12. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs HUT.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while HUT.TO trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs DEFI.NE Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while DEFI.NE trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is -42.69. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs CF.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 911.48M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while CF.TO trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -24.69. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs CF-PC.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 896.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while CF-PC.TO trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs BITF.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 714.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while BITF.TO trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs PNP.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 198.63M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while PNP.TO trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is less volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs RICH.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while RICH.CN trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to RICH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs CXI.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 125.66M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while CXI.TO trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs XAU.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 110.94M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while XAU.TO trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs BIGG.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while BIGG.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs FRNT.V Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 15.63M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while FRNT.V trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs SPIR.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 12.99M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while SPIR.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is less volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs HOLD.NE Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 11.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while HOLD.NE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is less volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs BTC.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while BTC.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs ARM.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while ARM.CN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to ARM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs CODE.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while CODE.CN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to CODE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs GBC.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while GBC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to GBC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs SIX.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, SIX.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while SIX.CN trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HODL.CN has daily volatility of 9.34 and SIX.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
HODL.CN vs FXC.TO Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, FXC.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while FXC.TO trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HODL.CN is more volatile compared to FXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HODL.CN.
HODL.CN vs DIGI.CN Comparison
HODL.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HODL.CN stands at 565.14M. In comparison, DIGI.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HODL.CN is priced at $3.69, while DIGI.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HODL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 92.25, whereas DIGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HODL.CN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DIGI.CN's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HODL.CN has daily volatility of 9.34 and DIGI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS.NE | $27.92 | +0.11% | 242.11B | 12.93 | $2.16 | +2.91% |
| GLXY.TO | $26.69 | -3.54% | 9.24B | 35.12 | $0.76 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | $19.35 | -1.88% | 2.02B | 4.12 | $4.70 | N/A |
| DEFI.NE | $5.55 | +20.65% | 1.82B | -42.69 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| CF.TO | $8.89 | +0.91% | 911.48M | -24.69 | -$0.36 | +3.83% |
| CF-PC.TO | $22.80 | +0.57% | 896.09M | 10.56 | $2.16 | +3.83% |
| BITF.TO | $1.49 | +0.34% | 714.73M | -8.28 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| HODL.CN | $3.69 | +11.82% | 565.14M | 92.25 | $0.04 | N/A |
| PNP.TO | $21.16 | +11.96% | 198.63M | 6.22 | $3.40 | N/A |
| RICH.CN | $2.85 | N/A | 142.73M | -28.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |