Hochschild Mining plc
Hochschild Mining plc HOC.L Peers
See (HOC.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOC.L | £265.00 | -1.92% | 1.4B | 19.24 | £0.14 | +0.30% |
| PLZL.IL | £19,650.50 | +4.07% | 25.7T | 3429.41 | £5.73 | N/A |
| 0R4M.L | £492.40 | -1.72% | 123.3B | 762.69 | £0.67 | +13.19% |
| 0QYZ.L | £226.00 | +0.69% | 43.5B | 45.03 | £5.02 | +1.07% |
| 0R28.L | £52.11 | +0.00% | 42.3B | 39.39 | £1.32 | +2.16% |
| GGP.L | £307.50 | -3.00% | 37.1B | -315.00 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| WPM.L | £6,440.00 | -3.59% | 28.9B | 64.24 | £0.99 | +0.95% |
| EDV.L | £2,186.00 | -4.54% | 5.4B | -76.34 | -£0.29 | +3.40% |
| AUY.L | £475.00 | +1.06% | 4.6B | -5.72 | -£0.83 | N/A |
| CEY.L | £146.00 | N/A | 1.7B | 24.33 | £0.06 | +0.90% |
Stock Comparison
HOC.L vs PLZL.IL Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLZL.IL has a market cap of 25.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while PLZL.IL trades at £19,650.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas PLZL.IL's P/E ratio is 3429.41. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLZL.IL's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to PLZL.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs 0R4M.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0R4M.L has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while 0R4M.L trades at £492.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas 0R4M.L's P/E ratio is 762.69. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0R4M.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0R4M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs 0QYZ.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0QYZ.L has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while 0QYZ.L trades at £226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas 0QYZ.L's P/E ratio is 45.03. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0QYZ.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0QYZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs 0R28.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0R28.L has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while 0R28.L trades at £52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas 0R28.L's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0R28.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0R28.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs GGP.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GGP.L has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while GGP.L trades at £307.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas GGP.L's P/E ratio is -315.00. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGP.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to GGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs WPM.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WPM.L has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while WPM.L trades at £6,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas WPM.L's P/E ratio is 64.24. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to WPM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs EDV.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EDV.L has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while EDV.L trades at £2,186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas EDV.L's P/E ratio is -76.34. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EDV.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to EDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs AUY.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AUY.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while AUY.L trades at £475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas AUY.L's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUY.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to AUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs CEY.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CEY.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while CEY.L trades at £146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas CEY.L's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CEY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CEY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs PAF.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PAF.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while PAF.L trades at £48.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas PAF.L's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAF.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to PAF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs RSG.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RSG.L has a market cap of 690.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while RSG.L trades at £30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas RSG.L's P/E ratio is -32.45. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RSG.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to RSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs MTL.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MTL.L has a market cap of 434.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while MTL.L trades at £15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas MTL.L's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTL.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to MTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs AMRQ.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMRQ.L has a market cap of 349.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while AMRQ.L trades at £74.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas AMRQ.L's P/E ratio is -25.67. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMRQ.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to AMRQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs CMCL.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMCL.L has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while CMCL.L trades at £1,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas CMCL.L's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCL.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CMCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs THX.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, THX.L has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while THX.L trades at £41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas THX.L's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THX.L's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to THX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs AAZ.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AAZ.L has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while AAZ.L trades at £168.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas AAZ.L's P/E ratio is -15.41. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAZ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to AAZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs SHG.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHG.L has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while SHG.L trades at £14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas SHG.L's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to SHG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs ALTN.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALTN.L has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while ALTN.L trades at £520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas ALTN.L's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALTN.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to ALTN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs SRB.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SRB.L has a market cap of 130.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while SRB.L trades at £175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas SRB.L's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRB.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to SRB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs CNR.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CNR.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while CNR.L trades at £32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas CNR.L's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CNR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs KEFI.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KEFI.L has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while KEFI.L trades at £0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas KEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEFI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to KEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs HUM.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HUM.L has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while HUM.L trades at £2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas HUM.L's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUM.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to HUM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs PAT.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PAT.L has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while PAT.L trades at £14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas PAT.L's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to PAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs CORA.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CORA.L has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while CORA.L trades at £7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas CORA.L's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORA.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CORA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs 0UH8.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0UH8.L has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while 0UH8.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas 0UH8.L's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0UH8.L's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to 0UH8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs AAU.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AAU.L has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while AAU.L trades at £1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas AAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to AAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs OMI.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OMI.L has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while OMI.L trades at £7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas OMI.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to OMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs LEX.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LEX.L has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while LEX.L trades at £3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas LEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEX.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to LEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs 0VLY.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0VLY.L has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while 0VLY.L trades at £0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas 0VLY.L's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0VLY.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0VLY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs GDP.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GDP.L has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while GDP.L trades at £6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas GDP.L's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GDP.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to GDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs SGZ.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SGZ.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while SGZ.L trades at £12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas SGZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGZ.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to SGZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs WSBN.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WSBN.L has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while WSBN.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas WSBN.L's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSBN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to WSBN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs ORR.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ORR.L has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while ORR.L trades at £0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas ORR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to ORR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs GCAT.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GCAT.L has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while GCAT.L trades at £0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas GCAT.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GCAT.L's ROE of +5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to GCAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs XTR.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, XTR.L has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while XTR.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas XTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XTR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to XTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs GRL.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GRL.L has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while GRL.L trades at £0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas GRL.L's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRL.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to GRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs 0V9B.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0V9B.L has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while 0V9B.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas 0V9B.L's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V9B.L's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0V9B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs CNG.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CNG.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while CNG.L trades at £1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas CNG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNG.L's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs 0V2Y.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0V2Y.L has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while 0V2Y.L trades at £0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas 0V2Y.L's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V2Y.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0V2Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs ECR.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ECR.L has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while ECR.L trades at £0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas ECR.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to ECR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs PALM.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PALM.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while PALM.L trades at £58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas PALM.L's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PALM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to PALM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs GAL.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GAL.L has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while GAL.L trades at £3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas GAL.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GAL.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to GAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs HAMA.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HAMA.L has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while HAMA.L trades at £2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas HAMA.L's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAMA.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to HAMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs CGNR.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CGNR.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while CGNR.L trades at £7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas CGNR.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to CGNR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs CGH.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CGH.L has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while CGH.L trades at £0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas CGH.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs KAT.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KAT.L has a market cap of 947.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while KAT.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas KAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KAT.L's ROE of +11.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to KAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs AEXG.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AEXG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while AEXG.L trades at £40.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas AEXG.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEXG.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to AEXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs POG.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, POG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while POG.L trades at £1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas POG.L's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POG.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to POG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.
HOC.L vs PUR.L Comparison
HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PUR.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at £265.00, while PUR.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.24, whereas PUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUR.L's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to PUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.