Hochschild Mining plc

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, PLZL.IL has a market cap of 25.68T. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while PLZL.IL trades at $19,650.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas PLZL.IL's P/E ratio is 3429.41. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLZL.IL's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to PLZL.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, 0R4M.L has a market cap of 104.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while 0R4M.L trades at $435.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas 0R4M.L's P/E ratio is 650.20. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0R4M.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to 0R4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, 0QYZ.L has a market cap of 45.30B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while 0QYZ.L trades at $235.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas 0QYZ.L's P/E ratio is 46.86. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0QYZ.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0QYZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, 0R28.L has a market cap of 42.31B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while 0R28.L trades at $52.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas 0R28.L's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0R28.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to 0R28.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WPM.L has a market cap of 29.08B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while WPM.L trades at $6,410.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas WPM.L's P/E ratio is 72.84. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPM.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to WPM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, EDV.L has a market cap of 5.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while EDV.L trades at $2,258.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas EDV.L's P/E ratio is -72.84. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EDV.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to EDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AUY.L has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while AUY.L trades at $475.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas AUY.L's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUY.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to AUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GGP.L has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while GGP.L trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas GGP.L's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGP.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to GGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CEY.L has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while CEY.L trades at $146.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas CEY.L's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CEY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CEY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, PAF.L has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while PAF.L trades at $49.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas PAF.L's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAF.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to PAF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, RSG.L has a market cap of 615.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while RSG.L trades at $28.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas RSG.L's P/E ratio is -28.90. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RSG.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to RSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AMRQ.L has a market cap of 352.99M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while AMRQ.L trades at $88.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas AMRQ.L's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMRQ.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to AMRQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, THX.L has a market cap of 220.89M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while THX.L trades at $33.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas THX.L's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THX.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to THX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, MTL.L has a market cap of 200.61M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while MTL.L trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas MTL.L's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTL.L's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to MTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CMCL.L has a market cap of 196.81M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while CMCL.L trades at $1,020.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas CMCL.L's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCL.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to CMCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AAZ.L has a market cap of 158.80M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while AAZ.L trades at $139.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas AAZ.L's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAZ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to AAZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SRB.L has a market cap of 138.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while SRB.L trades at $151.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas SRB.L's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to SRB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ALTN.L has a market cap of 106.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while ALTN.L trades at $389.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas ALTN.L's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALTN.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to ALTN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CNR.L has a market cap of 65.86M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while CNR.L trades at $32.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas CNR.L's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNR.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to CNR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, KEFI.L has a market cap of 50.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while KEFI.L trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas KEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEFI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to KEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, HUM.L has a market cap of 45.99M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while HUM.L trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas HUM.L's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUM.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to HUM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, PAT.L has a market cap of 44.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while PAT.L trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas PAT.L's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to PAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CORA.L has a market cap of 41.21M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while CORA.L trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas CORA.L's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORA.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to CORA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, OMI.L has a market cap of 35.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while OMI.L trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas OMI.L's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to OMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AAU.L has a market cap of 24.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while AAU.L trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas AAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to AAU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, 0UH8.L has a market cap of 15.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while 0UH8.L trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas 0UH8.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0UH8.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to 0UH8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, LEX.L has a market cap of 13.47M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while LEX.L trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas LEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEX.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to LEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GDP.L has a market cap of 11.95M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while GDP.L trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas GDP.L's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GDP.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to GDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, 0VLY.L has a market cap of 11.21M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while 0VLY.L trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas 0VLY.L's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0VLY.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0VLY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GRL.L has a market cap of 9.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while GRL.L trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas GRL.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRL.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to GRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, XTR.L has a market cap of 8.14M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while XTR.L trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas XTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XTR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to XTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ORR.L has a market cap of 7.85M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while ORR.L trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas ORR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to ORR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GCAT.L has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while GCAT.L trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas GCAT.L's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GCAT.L's ROE of +5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to GCAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CNG.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while CNG.L trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas CNG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNG.L's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ECR.L has a market cap of 4.94M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while ECR.L trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas ECR.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to ECR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GAL.L has a market cap of 3.62M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while GAL.L trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas GAL.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GAL.L's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to GAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, 0V2Y.L has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while 0V2Y.L trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas 0V2Y.L's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V2Y.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0V2Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WSBN.L has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while WSBN.L trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas WSBN.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSBN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to WSBN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, PALM.L has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while PALM.L trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas PALM.L's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PALM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to PALM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CGNR.L has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while CGNR.L trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas CGNR.L's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGNR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to CGNR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, 0V9B.L has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while 0V9B.L trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas 0V9B.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V9B.L's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to 0V9B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CGH.L has a market cap of 1.05M. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while CGH.L trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas CGH.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to CGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, KAT.L has a market cap of 947504.00. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while KAT.L trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas KAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KAT.L's ROE of +11.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to KAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, HAMA.L has a market cap of 385111.00. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while HAMA.L trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas HAMA.L's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAMA.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to HAMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SHG.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while SHG.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas SHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HOC.L has daily volatility of 2.32 and SHG.L has daily volatility of N/A.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AEXG.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while AEXG.L trades at $40.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas AEXG.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEXG.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to AEXG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, POG.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while POG.L trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas POG.L's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POG.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is less volatile compared to POG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SGZ.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while SGZ.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas SGZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGZ.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HOC.L has daily volatility of 2.32 and SGZ.L has daily volatility of N/A.

HOC.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HOC.L stands at 1.50B. In comparison, PUR.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HOC.L is priced at $290.60, while PUR.L trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HOC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.76, whereas PUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOC.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUR.L's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HOC.L is more volatile compared to PUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOC.L.