Himalaya Technologies, Inc.
Himalaya Technologies, Inc. (HMLA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HMLA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMLA | $0.00 | +40.00% | 272.5K | -0.07 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | +0.00% | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $17.15 | +6.46% | 32.5B | 9.17 | $1.87 | +7.14% |
| PEXNY | $9.76 | +0.00% | 19.4B | 8.13 | $1.20 | +5.42% |
| TRMLF | $44.81 | -1.39% | 17.4B | 18.03 | $2.49 | +4.32% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | +0.00% | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| IPXHY | $14.08 | -0.42% | 16.9B | 5.88 | $2.40 | +3.80% |
| STOSF | $5.10 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 13.42 | $0.38 | +4.60% |
| SSLZY | $5.13 | +0.59% | 16.5B | 13.39 | $0.38 | +1.74% |
| IPXHF | $13.50 | +0.00% | 16.2B | 5.63 | $2.40 | +4.19% |
Stock Comparison
HMLA vs NSTKF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and NSTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSTKF's competition here
HMLA vs WOPEF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while WOPEF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and WOPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WOPEF's competition here
HMLA vs PEXNY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PEXNY trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and PEXNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEXNY's competition here
HMLA vs TRMLF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while TRMLF trades at $44.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check TRMLF's competition here
HMLA vs DETNF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and DETNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETNF's competition here
HMLA vs IPXHY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while IPXHY trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check IPXHY's competition here
HMLA vs STOSF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while STOSF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and STOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STOSF's competition here
HMLA vs SSLZY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while SSLZY trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check SSLZY's competition here
HMLA vs IPXHF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while IPXHF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and IPXHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPXHF's competition here
HMLA vs RGRLF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, RGRLF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while RGRLF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RGRLF's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RGRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to RGRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check RGRLF's competition here
HMLA vs AETUF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while AETUF trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check AETUF's competition here
HMLA vs NOVKY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and NOVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOVKY's competition here
HMLA vs SPGYF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check SPGYF's competition here
HMLA vs PTRRY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PTRRY trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PTRRY's competition here
HMLA vs DKDRF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while DKDRF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and DKDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DKDRF's competition here
HMLA vs MEGEF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while MEGEF trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check MEGEF's competition here
HMLA vs VSOGF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while VSOGF trades at $47.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check VSOGF's competition here
HMLA vs PREKF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PREKF trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PREKF's competition here
HMLA vs DELKY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while DELKY trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check DELKY's competition here
HMLA vs DLKGF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while DLKGF trades at $213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and DLKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLKGF's competition here
HMLA vs PMOIF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PMOIF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and PMOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMOIF's competition here
HMLA vs HBRIY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while HBRIY trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check HBRIY's competition here
HMLA vs OASPW Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and OASPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OASPW's competition here
HMLA vs PEYUF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PEYUF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PEYUF's competition here
HMLA vs EFVIF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check EFVIF's competition here
HMLA vs EERGF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while EERGF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and EERGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EERGF's competition here
HMLA vs BTEGF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and BTEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTEGF's competition here
HMLA vs PRMRF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PRMRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PRMRF's competition here
HMLA vs BEPTF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while BEPTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and BEPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEPTF's competition here
HMLA vs ATHOF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while ATHOF trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check ATHOF's competition here
HMLA vs NUVSF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while NUVSF trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check NUVSF's competition here
HMLA vs PTGIF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PTGIF's competition here
HMLA vs BCHEY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while BCHEY trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and BCHEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHEY's competition here
HMLA vs IPCFF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while IPCFF trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check IPCFF's competition here
HMLA vs MEYYY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and MEYYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEYYY's competition here
HMLA vs JPTXF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while JPTXF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and JPTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPTXF's competition here
HMLA vs FRHLF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while FRHLF trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check FRHLF's competition here
HMLA vs AAVVF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while AAVVF trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -62.38. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check AAVVF's competition here
HMLA vs BIREF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while BIREF trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check BIREF's competition here
HMLA vs CDDRF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while CDDRF trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check CDDRF's competition here
HMLA vs DTNOF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while DTNOF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and DTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTNOF's competition here
HMLA vs CRCQW Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check CRCQW's competition here
HMLA vs WLLAW Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check WLLAW's competition here
HMLA vs KELTF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while KELTF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and KELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KELTF's competition here
HMLA vs PARXF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PARXF trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PARXF's competition here
HMLA vs KRNGF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 916.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while KRNGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and KRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNGF's competition here
HMLA vs UNEGF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and UNEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNEGF's competition here
HMLA vs AOIFF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 878.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while AOIFF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check AOIFF's competition here
HMLA vs SQZZF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while SQZZF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and SQZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SQZZF's competition here
HMLA vs CWEGF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check CWEGF's competition here
HMLA vs CRLFF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 853.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while CRLFF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check CRLFF's competition here
HMLA vs BWEFF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 774.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while BWEFF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check BWEFF's competition here
HMLA vs DALXF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 681.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while DALXF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 42.60. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and DALXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DALXF's competition here
HMLA vs KWTEF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 677.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while KWTEF trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and KWTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWTEF's competition here
HMLA vs AAGEF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and AAGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAGEF's competition here
HMLA vs RCKHF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 557.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while RCKHF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check RCKHF's competition here
HMLA vs ZPTAF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while ZPTAF trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check ZPTAF's competition here
HMLA vs GFKSY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and GFKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GFKSY's competition here
HMLA vs GUKYF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while GUKYF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 74.00. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and GUKYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUKYF's competition here
HMLA vs KRNGY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 472.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while KRNGY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check KRNGY's competition here
HMLA vs SHASF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 470M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while SHASF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and SHASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHASF's competition here
HMLA vs PTALF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 469.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PTALF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PTALF's competition here
HMLA vs COPJF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while COPJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check COPJF's competition here
HMLA vs TBNRF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and TBNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBNRF's competition here
HMLA vs PTHRF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PTHRF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -32.70. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PTHRF's competition here
HMLA vs ATUUF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while ATUUF trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -42.79. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check ATUUF's competition here
HMLA vs BKBEF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check BKBEF's competition here
HMLA vs PRYGF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and PRYGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRYGF's competition here
HMLA vs PEGIY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and PEGIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEGIY's competition here
HMLA vs ENQUF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while ENQUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and ENQUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENQUF's competition here
HMLA vs OILSF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 323.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while OILSF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check OILSF's competition here
HMLA vs CEIEF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while CEIEF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check CEIEF's competition here
HMLA vs FECCF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while FECCF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check FECCF's competition here
HMLA vs TUWLF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while TUWLF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and TUWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUWLF's competition here
HMLA vs EXCE Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 260.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while EXCE trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check EXCE's competition here
HMLA vs PESAF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PESAF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and PESAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PESAF's competition here
HMLA vs TUWOY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while TUWOY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check TUWOY's competition here
HMLA vs GEGYF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while GEGYF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check GEGYF's competition here
HMLA vs ZNOG Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while ZNOG trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check ZNOG's competition here
HMLA vs HZNFF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and HZNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZNFF's competition here
HMLA vs IPOOF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while IPOOF trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check IPOOF's competition here
HMLA vs ITEEF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check ITEEF's competition here
HMLA vs CRNZF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check CRNZF's competition here
HMLA vs PIFYF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PIFYF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PIFYF's competition here
HMLA vs PSHIF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PSHIF's competition here
HMLA vs GASXF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while GASXF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check GASXF's competition here
HMLA vs EEGUF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 184.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while EEGUF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check EEGUF's competition here
HMLA vs HRCXF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and HRCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRCXF's competition here
HMLA vs SEUSF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 181.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while SEUSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -15.98. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check SEUSF's competition here
HMLA vs RECWF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and RECWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RECWF's competition here
HMLA vs ALVOF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 158.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while ALVOF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check ALVOF's competition here
HMLA vs GEGYY Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check GEGYY's competition here
HMLA vs SVNNF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while SVNNF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and SVNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVNNF's competition here
HMLA vs PNWRF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check PNWRF's competition here
HMLA vs KGEIF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check KGEIF's competition here
HMLA vs LNDNF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while LNDNF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA is less volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLA.Check LNDNF's competition here
HMLA vs PTRUF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while PTRUF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 107.29. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and PTRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTRUF's competition here
HMLA vs RUBLF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while RUBLF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and RUBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RUBLF's competition here
HMLA vs SLGYF Comparison July 2025
HMLA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLA stands at 272.5K. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLA is priced at $0.00, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, HMLA's ROE is +1.31%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLA and SLGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLGYF's competition here