HUMBL, Inc.
HUMBL, Inc. HMBL Peers
See (HMBL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMBL | $0.00 | -33.33% | 8M | -0.02 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $300.97 | +1.62% | 351.1B | 54.23 | $5.55 | +0.87% |
| CNSWF | $3,582.33 | +1.18% | 75.9B | 102.53 | $34.94 | +0.11% |
| NEMKY | $26.00 | +26.83% | 75.1B | 74.29 | $0.35 | +0.46% |
| OBIIF | $127.00 | +336.43% | 55.9B | 123.30 | $1.03 | +0.18% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.1B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTY | $37.37 | -0.85% | 49.1B | 37.00 | $1.01 | +0.70% |
| DASTF | $37.34 | +0.08% | 49B | 36.97 | $1.01 | +0.67% |
| WTCHF | $70.63 | +2.62% | 23.4B | 115.79 | $0.61 | +0.15% |
| WIGBY | $64.01 | -9.71% | 21.2B | 106.68 | $0.60 | +0.20% |
Stock Comparison
HMBL vs SAPGF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 351.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SAPGF trades at $300.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 54.23. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs CNSWF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while CNSWF trades at $3,582.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 102.53. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs NEMKY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while NEMKY trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 74.29. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and NEMKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs OBIIF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while OBIIF trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 123.30. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and OBIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs INVUP Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and INVUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs DASTY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while DASTY trades at $37.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs DASTF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while DASTF trades at $37.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs WTCHF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while WTCHF trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 115.79. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs WIGBY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while WIGBY trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 106.68. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs DIDIY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while DIDIY trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 115.38. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs XROLF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while XROLF trades at $117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 136.74. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and XROLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs SGGEF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SGGEF trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and SGGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs SGPYY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SGPYY trades at $65.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 35.03. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs OCLCF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while OCLCF trades at $117.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and OCLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs NEMTF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while NEMTF trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 71.61. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and NEMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs LQAVF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, LQAVF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while LQAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LQAVF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to LQAVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to LQAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs NCSYF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while NCSYF trades at $165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and NCSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs ALMFF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs THNOF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs TMNSF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TMNSF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and TMNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs HOILF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and HOILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs TMSNY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TMSNY trades at $74.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs KGDEY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while KGDEY trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -263.18. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and KGDEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs LIFX Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while LIFX trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 491.25. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs FNOXF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while FNOXF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs SMCYY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and SMCYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs SICRF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and SICRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs KXSCF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while KXSCF trades at $143.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 421.35. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs SRBEF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SRBEF trades at $213.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -75.07. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs ASOZY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ASOZY trades at $48.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and ASOZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs TMIX Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TMIX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TMIX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMIX's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TMIX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to TMIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs ZEUCF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ZEUCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and ZEUCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs ASOZF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs ISDSF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ISDSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ISDSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ISDSF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ISDSF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to ISDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs QTGPF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while QTGPF trades at $90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and QTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs WEMXF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while WEMXF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs TMVWF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TMVWF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs UBMRF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs TMVWY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TMVWY trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs KHOTF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs ESKEF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and ESKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs FREKF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while FREKF trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -22.75. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and FREKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs TMOAY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TMOAY trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -57.80. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and TMOAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs MAGTF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and MAGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs KNNNF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while KNNNF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and KNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs IPEU Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while IPEU trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs SWONF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SWONF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -797.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs GBGPF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while GBGPF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 113.75. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and GBGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs VOBIF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and VOBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs EGHSF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while EGHSF trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and EGHSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs LTTHF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and LTTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs ESIGF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs BTRCF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 804.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while BTRCF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs SLVFF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs BVSFF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and BVSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs TTMZF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs TMOAF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TMOAF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and TMOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs NPACY Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while NPACY trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and NPACY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs RWWI Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while RWWI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and RWWI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs PSSWF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 503.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while PSSWF trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and PSSWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs NXLLF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 496.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while NXLLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and NXLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs NSWEF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and NSWEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs CHNVF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and CHNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs BLKLF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 468.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while BLKLF trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -79.39. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs TCYSF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 465.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while TCYSF trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 209.33. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and TCYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs BRDLF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and BRDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs NPACF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while NPACF trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs IQGLF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs BHPA Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while BHPA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs CMDXF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while CMDXF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs RPGHF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs LCHTF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while LCHTF trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and LCHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs PLDIF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 362.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while PLDIF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and PLDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs JAPPF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and JAPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs ELMFF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and ELMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs BCTCF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 320.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while BCTCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and BCTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs RLLMF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while RLLMF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 207.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and RLLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs PXPHF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while PXPHF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs DOTDF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs PTRRF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, PTRRF has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while PTRRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PTRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to PTRRF's ROE of +2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to PTRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs IVUFF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs CIGMF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and CIGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs ABXXF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while ABXXF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs GBUX Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while GBUX trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -60.60. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs LOQPF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while LOQPF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and LOQPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs SMTEF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SMTEF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and SMTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs EXMXF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and EXMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs MCAP Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while MCAP trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and MCAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs BAINF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while BAINF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and BAINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs DAHLF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and DAHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs LUPGF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, LUPGF has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while LUPGF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LUPGF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to LUPGF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to LUPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs FXSRF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and FXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs NEOJF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while NEOJF trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and NEOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs FBSFF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while FBSFF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and FBSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs WONDF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs SYZLF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 157.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while SYZLF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -168.25. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.
HMBL vs IARGF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and IARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs EXSPF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL and EXSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HMBL vs CBSZF Comparison
HMBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMBL stands at 8M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMBL is priced at $0.00, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, HMBL's ROE is +6.43%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMBL is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMBL.