Home Loan Financial Corporation
Home Loan Financial Corporation HLFN Peers
See (HLFN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLFN | $32.45 | -0.15% | 45.5M | 7.10 | $4.57 | +5.93% |
| UNCRY | $32.09 | +1.81% | 205.8B | 9.36 | $3.43 | +2.40% |
| CAIXY | $2.80 | +0.36% | 179.1B | 9.03 | $0.31 | +5.90% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.3B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.52 | -0.01% | 155.3B | 8.06 | $3.91 | +4.31% |
| CIHHF | $6.32 | +16.59% | 155B | 8.10 | $0.78 | +5.44% |
| UNCFF | $64.50 | +0.80% | 100.5B | 9.42 | $6.85 | +3.64% |
| BNPQY | $43.99 | +1.78% | 99.4B | 8.18 | $5.38 | +5.14% |
| DBSDY | $138.51 | +0.08% | 98.5B | 6.37 | $21.74 | +4.07% |
| IITSF | $5.51 | +1.57% | 98B | 9.67 | $0.57 | +6.84% |
Stock Comparison
HLFN vs UNCRY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while UNCRY trades at $32.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CAIXY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CAIXY trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BKAYY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CIHKY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CIHKY trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CIHHF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 155B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CIHHF trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs UNCFF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while UNCFF trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BNPQY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BNPQY trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs DBSDY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while DBSDY trades at $138.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs IITSF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while IITSF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs DBSDF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while DBSDF trades at $34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BNPQF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BNPQF trades at $83.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SBKFF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs KBCSY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while KBCSY trades at $49.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs PBCRF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while PBCRF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs PBCRY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while PBCRY trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs MZHOF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while MZHOF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs AKSJF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs PSBKF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs EBKDY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while EBKDY trades at $40.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CIXPF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CIXPF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs LLOBF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while LLOBF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs LLDTF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while LLDTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CRARF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CRARF trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs OVCHF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while OVCHF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CHCJY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CHCJY trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs OVCHY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while OVCHY trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CRARY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CRARY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CHBJF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CHBJF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs NBNKF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while NBNKF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs NRDBY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while NRDBY trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs UOVEF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs STNDF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs UOVEY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while UOVEY trades at $55.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BHKLY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BHKLY trades at $86.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SCGLY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SCGLY trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BNKHF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BNKHF trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs DNBBF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while DNBBF trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BKRKF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BKRKF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs DNBBY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while DNBBY trades at $27.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BKRKY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BKRKY trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SCGLF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SCGLF trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs KBCSF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while KBCSF trades at $97.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CRZBY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CRZBY trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SVKEF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SVKEF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CWESF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CRZBF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CRZBF trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs JPSTF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs JPPTY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs DNKEY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while DNKEY trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs EBKOF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while EBKOF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CEBCF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs PPERY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while PPERY trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SWDBY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SWDBY trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs MLYBY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while MLYBY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SWDBF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SWDBF trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs JPHLF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs MLYNF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs DNSKF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs JPPHY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while JPPHY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs PPERF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while PPERF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs HSNGY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while HSNGY trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs PSZKF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while PSZKF trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BDORY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BDORY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs GBOOY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while GBOOY trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CMAKY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CMAKY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs PSZKY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while PSZKY trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs HSNGF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs GBOOF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while GBOOF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs FCNCB Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while FCNCB trades at $1,626.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BLMIF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BLMIF trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CGMBF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CKHGY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CKHGY trades at $96.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BPXXY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BKHYY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BKHYY trades at $79.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SGBLY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SGBLY trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SBGOF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SBGOF trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs RSNHF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while RSNHF trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CKHGF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs MDIBY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while MDIBY trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CMTDF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CMTDF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SUTNY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SUTNY trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs CRDIY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs PBLOF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BKHPF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs GPFOF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs ISNPY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while ISNPY trades at $33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs AIBGY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while AIBGY trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs AIBRF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while AIBRF trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BDOUF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs GPFOY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SKCBY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs VLYPN Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while VLYPN trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BNCZF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs OTPBF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs SUGBY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BKRIY Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BKRIY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs MDIBF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BKRIF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BKRIF trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.
HLFN vs BKPKF Comparison
HLFN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLFN stands at 45.5M. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLFN is priced at $32.45, while BKPKF trades at $44.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLFN currently has a P/E ratio of 7.10, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, HLFN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLFN is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLFN.