Henderson Land Development Company Limited

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, MTSFF has a market cap of 28.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while MTSFF trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas MTSFF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTSFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to MTSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, MTSFY has a market cap of 27.91B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while MTSFY trades at $30.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas MTSFY's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTSFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF and MTSFY have similar daily volatility (1.46).

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, MITEY has a market cap of 22.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while MITEY trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas MITEY's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MITEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to MITEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, MITEF has a market cap of 22.24B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while MITEF trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas MITEF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MITEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to MITEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, HLDCY has a market cap of 14.86B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while HLDCY trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HLDCY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLDCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to HLDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, SPHXF has a market cap of 13.28B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while SPHXF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SPHXF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPHXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to SPHXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, BALDF has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while BALDF trades at $6.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas BALDF's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BALDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to BALDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, PSPSF has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while PSPSF trades at $179.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PSPSF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSPSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to PSPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, CPNNF has a market cap of 8.08B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while CPNNF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas CPNNF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPNNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to CPNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, DIFTY has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while DIFTY trades at $28.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas DIFTY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIFTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to DIFTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, DITTF has a market cap of 6.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while DITTF trades at $102.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas DITTF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DITTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to DITTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, TTUUF has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while TTUUF trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas TTUUF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTUUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to TTUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, TKFOY has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while TKFOY trades at $12.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas TKFOY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKFOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to TKFOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, HHC has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while HHC trades at $78.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HHC's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HHC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to HHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, HHH has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while HHH trades at $71.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HHH's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HHH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to HHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, VESTF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while VESTF trades at $3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas VESTF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VESTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to VESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, AMLLF has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while AMLLF trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas AMLLF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to AMLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, FSRPF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while FSRPF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas FSRPF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to FSRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, LLESF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while LLESF trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas LLESF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LLESF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to LLESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, JOE has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while JOE trades at $44.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas JOE's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JOE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to JOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, HUFAF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while HUFAF trades at $12.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HUFAF's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to HUFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, LLESY has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while LLESY trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas LLESY's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LLESY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to LLESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, UILCF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while UILCF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas UILCF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UILCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to UILCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, HNLGY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while HNLGY trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HNLGY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HNLGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to HNLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, UILCY has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while UILCY trades at $27.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas UILCY's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UILCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to UILCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, HNLGF has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while HNLGF trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HNLGF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HNLGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to HNLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, NWWDF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while NWWDF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas NWWDF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NWWDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to NWWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, NDVLY has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while NDVLY trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas NDVLY's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NDVLY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to NDVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, GEAHF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while GEAHF trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas GEAHF's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEAHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to GEAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, LCOMF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while LCOMF trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas LCOMF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to LCOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, COYJF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while COYJF trades at $6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas COYJF's P/E ratio is 200.53. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COYJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to COYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, PTPKF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while PTPKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PTPKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to PTPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, IRICF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while IRICF trades at $206.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas IRICF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IRICF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to IRICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, MRCBF has a market cap of 900.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while MRCBF trades at $83.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas MRCBF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRCBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to MRCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, GZTGF has a market cap of 597.83M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while GZTGF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas GZTGF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GZTGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to GZTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, NNXXY has a market cap of 574.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while NNXXY trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas NNXXY's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NNXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to NNXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, GDVTZ has a market cap of 546.70M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while GDVTZ trades at $500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas GDVTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GDVTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to GDVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, SIOLF has a market cap of 364.81M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while SIOLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SIOLF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIOLF's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to SIOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, SIOLY has a market cap of 239.64M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while SIOLY trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SIOLY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIOLY's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to SIOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, SHTGF has a market cap of 234.77M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while SHTGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SHTGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHTGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to SHTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, SYYNY has a market cap of 200.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while SYYNY trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SYYNY's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYYNY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to SYYNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, MNPP has a market cap of 181.18M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while MNPP trades at $2,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas MNPP's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to MNPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, DDCCF has a market cap of 179.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while DDCCF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas DDCCF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DDCCF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to DDCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, STRS has a market cap of 156.53M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while STRS trades at $19.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas STRS's P/E ratio is 80.79. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STRS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to STRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, CHCI has a market cap of 112.17M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while CHCI trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas CHCI's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHCI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to CHCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, SNLKF has a market cap of 103.90M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while SNLKF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SNLKF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNLKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to SNLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, LVSDF has a market cap of 72.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while LVSDF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas LVSDF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LVSDF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to LVSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, HGPI has a market cap of 29.22M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while HGPI trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HGPI's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HGPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to HGPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, ECDP has a market cap of 19.91M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while ECDP trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas ECDP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to ECDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, HOOB has a market cap of 7.61M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while HOOB trades at $32.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas HOOB's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HOOB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to HOOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, TRRE has a market cap of 7.54M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while TRRE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas TRRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to TRRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, TPHS has a market cap of 2.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while TPHS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas TPHS's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TPHS's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to TPHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, SNNHF has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while SNNHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SNNHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to SNNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, IDVV has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while IDVV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas IDVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IDVV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to IDVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, VINO has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while VINO trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas VINO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VINO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to VINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, LSIHF has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while LSIHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas LSIHF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSIHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to LSIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, NIHK has a market cap of 527049.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while NIHK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas NIHK's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIHK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to NIHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, TDRK has a market cap of 520231.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while TDRK trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas TDRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to TDRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, FTPM has a market cap of 247564.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while FTPM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas FTPM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTPM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to FTPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, PCLI has a market cap of 226386.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while PCLI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas PCLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PCLI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to PCLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, BRER has a market cap of 164310.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while BRER trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas BRER's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRER's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to BRER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, CRDV has a market cap of 34107.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while CRDV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas CRDV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRDV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is less volatile compared to CRDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, YRIV has a market cap of 17953.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while YRIV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas YRIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YRIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to YRIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, SHIOF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while SHIOF trades at $11.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas SHIOF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to SHIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.

HLDVF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLDVF stands at 14.98B. In comparison, FCCTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, HLDVF is priced at $3.10, while FCCTP trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLDVF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.21, whereas FCCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLDVF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCCTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLDVF is more volatile compared to FCCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLDVF.