Hapag-Lloyd AG
Hapag-Lloyd AG HLAGF Peers
See (HLAGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLAGF | $186.35 | -0.88% | 32.75B | 12.28 | $15.17 | +5.49% |
| CICOF | $1.99 | +7.57% | 37.15B | 4.63 | $0.43 | +5.30% |
| CICOY | $8.95 | +1.94% | 34.01B | 4.18 | $2.14 | +5.84% |
| HPGLY | $94.27 | +2.51% | 33.14B | 12.24 | $7.70 | +4.06% |
| AMKAF | $1,894.76 | +4.39% | 30.06B | 4.21 | $450.01 | +8.63% |
| AMKBY | $9.58 | +0.04% | 29.38B | 4.26 | $2.25 | +11.64% |
| AMKBF | $1,876.00 | -0.49% | 29.32B | 4.17 | $450.00 | +8.72% |
| NPNYY | $7.27 | +2.25% | 15.75B | 11.54 | $0.63 | +4.01% |
| ICTEF | $7.65 | -1.42% | 15.44B | 18.21 | $0.42 | +3.23% |
| NYUKF | $34.20 | N/A | 14.82B | 10.79 | $3.17 | +2.70% |
Stock Comparison
HLAGF vs CICOF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 37.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CICOF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CICOY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 34.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CICOY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HPGLY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 33.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HPGLY trades at $94.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs AMKAF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 30.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while AMKAF trades at $1,894.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs AMKBY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, AMKBY has a market cap of 29.38B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while AMKBY trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas AMKBY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMKBY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to AMKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs AMKBF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 29.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while AMKBF trades at $1,876.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs NPNYY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 15.75B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while NPNYY trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs ICTEF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 15.44B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while ICTEF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs NYUKF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 14.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while NYUKF trades at $34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to NYUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs MSLOY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 12.51B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while MSLOY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs OROVY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 11.64B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while OROVY trades at $88.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs MSLOF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.39B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while MSLOF trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs OROVF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while OROVF trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs KAKKF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 9.62B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while KAKKF trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs PTAUY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while PTAUY trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs KAIKY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while KAIKY trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to KAIKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs QNDPF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 7.60B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while QNDPF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CMHHY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CMHHY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to CMHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs SITIY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while SITIY trades at $26.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs SITIF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while SITIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs MIHDF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to MIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CSDXF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CSDXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CMHHF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CMHHF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs DLPTF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HAFNF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CITAF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CITAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs PTAUF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while PTAUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs TDGMW Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while TDGMW trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to TDGMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HFIAF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to HFIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs BWLLY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to BWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CSPKF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CSPKF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CSPKF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CSPKF's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSPKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to CSPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs BWLLF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to BWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CADLF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CADLF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADLF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HOEGF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HOEGF trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CKNHF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CKNHF trades at $45.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to CKNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HHULF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HHULY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HHULY trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs SOIEF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while SOIEF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to SOIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs PCFBY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while PCFBY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HCTPF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HCTPF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs PCFBF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while PCFBF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to PCFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CITAY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CITAY trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to CITAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs WTSHF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while WTSHF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CHDGF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 949.95M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CHDGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to CHDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs IRCUF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 920.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while IRCUF trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs OKENF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876.00M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs DPBSF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 763.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while DPBSF trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs MPZZF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 749.85M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while MPZZF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to MPZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs LTKBF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 622.96M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to LTKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs TJIPF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 492.64M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while TJIPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs AGMJF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 468.56M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while AGMJF trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to AGMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs DMCOF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 456.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while DMCOF trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs SEMUF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 429.53M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while SEMUF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to SEMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs TSMTF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.95M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to TSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs PSGFF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 289.45M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while PSGFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs JMSFF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.85M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to JMSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs TTBKF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 260.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while TTBKF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs MKOTF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 238.43M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to MKOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs VKGLF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 210.48M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to VKGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs CSPKY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 192.96M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while CSPKY trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HSPPF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.60M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to HSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs SLOFF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 124.34M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while SLOFF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to SLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs BSEAF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 111.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while BSEAF trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to BSEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs JNSTF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 90.14M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while JNSTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs HUPHY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 69.34M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while HUPHY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs WSSTF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 45.72M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while WSSTF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs AWLNF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.52M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to AWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs GEOUF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 41.94M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to GEOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs ADCUF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.36M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to ADCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs ASCJF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 8.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while ASCJF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs GTMAY Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 8.03M. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while GTMAY trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to GTMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs SEAOF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 66076.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs BBLKF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 26980.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to BBLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs ULTRF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 14073.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs TEUFF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3115.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to TEUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs WLOLQ Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 1950.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs PRGNF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1150.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.
HLAGF vs TEUCF Comparison
HLAGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLAGF stands at 32.75B. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, HLAGF is priced at $186.35, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.28, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLAGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLAGF is more volatile compared to TEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLAGF.