Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited HKXCF Peers
See (HKXCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKXCF | $51.18 | +7.34% | 64.69B | 38.48 | $1.33 | +2.32% |
| ERNXY | $32.18 | -5.30% | 82.67B | 25.34 | $1.27 | +1.50% |
| LNSTY | $37.48 | -1.65% | 79.16B | 87.16 | $0.43 | +1.12% |
| LDNXF | $149.38 | -0.42% | 78.86B | 87.35 | $1.71 | +1.14% |
| HKXCY | $49.12 | +2.78% | 62.08B | 36.93 | $1.33 | +2.27% |
| DBOEY | $31.51 | -3.61% | 57.91B | 26.04 | $1.21 | +1.32% |
| DBOEF | $308.48 | -7.03% | 56.69B | 25.35 | $12.17 | +1.33% |
| EUXTF | $165.00 | -0.12% | 16.96B | 25.90 | $6.37 | +1.63% |
| BOLSY | $7.64 | -0.52% | 13.49B | 17.36 | $0.44 | +2.01% |
| OSCUF | $12.65 | +18.56% | 13.16B | 30.85 | $0.41 | +0.01% |
Stock Comparison
HKXCF vs ERNXY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, ERNXY has a market cap of 82.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while ERNXY trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas ERNXY's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ERNXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to ERNXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs LNSTY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, LNSTY has a market cap of 79.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while LNSTY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas LNSTY's P/E ratio is 87.16. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNSTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to LNSTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs LDNXF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, LDNXF has a market cap of 78.86B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while LDNXF trades at $149.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas LDNXF's P/E ratio is 87.35. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LDNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to LDNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs HKXCY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, HKXCY has a market cap of 62.08B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while HKXCY trades at $49.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas HKXCY's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HKXCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to HKXCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs DBOEY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, DBOEY has a market cap of 57.91B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while DBOEY trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas DBOEY's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DBOEY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to DBOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs DBOEF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, DBOEF has a market cap of 56.69B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while DBOEF trades at $308.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas DBOEF's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DBOEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to DBOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs EUXTF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, EUXTF has a market cap of 16.96B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while EUXTF trades at $165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas EUXTF's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EUXTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to EUXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs BOLSY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, BOLSY has a market cap of 13.49B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while BOLSY trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas BOLSY's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOLSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to BOLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs OSCUF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, OSCUF has a market cap of 13.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while OSCUF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas OSCUF's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OSCUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to OSCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs SPXCF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, SPXCF has a market cap of 12.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while SPXCF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas SPXCF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPXCF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to SPXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs JPXGY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, JPXGY has a market cap of 11.98B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while JPXGY trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas JPXGY's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPXGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to JPXGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs TMXXF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, TMXXF has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while TMXXF trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas TMXXF's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMXXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to TMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs ASXFF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, ASXFF has a market cap of 9.08B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while ASXFF trades at $46.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas ASXFF's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASXFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to ASXFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs ASXFY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, ASXFY has a market cap of 9.00B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while ASXFY trades at $46.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas ASXFY's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASXFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to ASXFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs BOMXF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, BOMXF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while BOMXF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas BOMXF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOMXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to BOMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs BSMAF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, BSMAF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while BSMAF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas BSMAF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSMAF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to BSMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs SPXCY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, SPXCY has a market cap of 794.54M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while SPXCY trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas SPXCY's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPXCY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to SPXCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs OTCM Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, OTCM has a market cap of 595.76M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while OTCM trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas OTCM's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OTCM's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to OTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs JSEJF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, JSEJF has a market cap of 472.71M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while JSEJF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas JSEJF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JSEJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to JSEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs HEXEY Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, HEXEY has a market cap of 371.40M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while HEXEY trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas HEXEY's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HEXEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to HEXEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs HEHSF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, HEHSF has a market cap of 347.10M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while HEHSF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas HEHSF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HEHSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to HEHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs NZSTF Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, NZSTF has a market cap of 284.51M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while NZSTF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas NZSTF's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NZSTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to NZSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs HNOI Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, HNOI has a market cap of 46.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while HNOI trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas HNOI's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HNOI's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to HNOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs QMCI Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, QMCI has a market cap of 14.48M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while QMCI trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas QMCI's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QMCI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to QMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs ITNM Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, ITNM has a market cap of 7.38M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while ITNM trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas ITNM's P/E ratio is -113.64. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ITNM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to ITNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.
HKXCF vs GLBR Comparison
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 64.69B. In comparison, GLBR has a market cap of 1843.00. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $51.18, while GLBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.48, whereas GLBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to GLBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.