Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKXCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HKXCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKXCF | $55.33 | +3.16% | 69.9B | 38.96 | $1.42 | +2.17% |
| ERNXY | $32.56 | -0.97% | 83.6B | 22.46 | $1.45 | +2.09% |
| LNSTY | $32.90 | +1.64% | 69.4B | 53.18 | $0.62 | +1.30% |
| HKXCY | $54.05 | +0.56% | 68.4B | 38.07 | $1.42 | +2.08% |
| LDNXF | $127.63 | +0.75% | 67.2B | 51.88 | $2.46 | +1.37% |
| DBOEF | $300.45 | +2.54% | 55.2B | 24.06 | $12.49 | +1.52% |
| DBOEY | $29.48 | -0.74% | 54.2B | 23.97 | $1.23 | +1.53% |
| EUXTF | $163.99 | +0.00% | 16.6B | 22.62 | $7.25 | +1.89% |
| SPXCF | $12.90 | +10.26% | 13.8B | 27.45 | $0.47 | +2.14% |
| BOLSY | $6.87 | -1.72% | 12B | 14.64 | $0.47 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
HKXCF vs ERNXY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, ERNXY has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while ERNXY trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas ERNXY's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERNXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to ERNXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check ERNXY's competition here
HKXCF vs LNSTY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, LNSTY has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while LNSTY trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas LNSTY's P/E ratio is 53.18. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LNSTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to LNSTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check LNSTY's competition here
HKXCF vs HKXCY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, HKXCY has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while HKXCY trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas HKXCY's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HKXCY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to HKXCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check HKXCY's competition here
HKXCF vs LDNXF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, LDNXF has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while LDNXF trades at $127.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas LDNXF's P/E ratio is 51.88. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LDNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to LDNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check LDNXF's competition here
HKXCF vs DBOEF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, DBOEF has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while DBOEF trades at $300.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas DBOEF's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DBOEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to DBOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check DBOEF's competition here
HKXCF vs DBOEY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, DBOEY has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while DBOEY trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas DBOEY's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DBOEY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to DBOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check DBOEY's competition here
HKXCF vs EUXTF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, EUXTF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while EUXTF trades at $163.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas EUXTF's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EUXTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to EUXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check EUXTF's competition here
HKXCF vs SPXCF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, SPXCF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while SPXCF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas SPXCF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPXCF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to SPXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check SPXCF's competition here
HKXCF vs BOLSY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, BOLSY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while BOLSY trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas BOLSY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to BOLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check BOLSY's competition here
HKXCF vs TMXXF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, TMXXF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while TMXXF trades at $41.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas TMXXF's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMXXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to TMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check TMXXF's competition here
HKXCF vs JPXGY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, JPXGY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while JPXGY trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas JPXGY's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JPXGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to JPXGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check JPXGY's competition here
HKXCF vs OSCUF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, OSCUF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while OSCUF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas OSCUF's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSCUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to OSCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check OSCUF's competition here
HKXCF vs ASXFF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, ASXFF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while ASXFF trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas ASXFF's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASXFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to ASXFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check ASXFF's competition here
HKXCF vs ASXFY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, ASXFY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while ASXFY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas ASXFY's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASXFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to ASXFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check ASXFY's competition here
HKXCF vs SPXCY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, SPXCY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while SPXCY trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas SPXCY's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPXCY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to SPXCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check SPXCY's competition here
HKXCF vs BOMXF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, BOMXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while BOMXF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas BOMXF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOMXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to BOMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check BOMXF's competition here
HKXCF vs BSMAF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, BSMAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while BSMAF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas BSMAF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSMAF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to BSMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check BSMAF's competition here
HKXCF vs OTCM Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, OTCM has a market cap of 676.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while OTCM trades at $56.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas OTCM's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTCM's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to OTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check OTCM's competition here
HKXCF vs JSEJF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, JSEJF has a market cap of 472.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while JSEJF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas JSEJF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JSEJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to JSEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check JSEJF's competition here
HKXCF vs HEHSF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, HEHSF has a market cap of 387.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while HEHSF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas HEHSF's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HEHSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to HEHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check HEHSF's competition here
HKXCF vs HEXEY Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, HEXEY has a market cap of 361.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while HEXEY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas HEXEY's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HEXEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to HEXEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check HEXEY's competition here
HKXCF vs NZSTF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, NZSTF has a market cap of 285.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while NZSTF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas NZSTF's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NZSTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to NZSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check NZSTF's competition here
HKXCF vs HNOI Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, HNOI has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while HNOI trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas HNOI's P/E ratio is -20.62. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HNOI's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to HNOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check HNOI's competition here
HKXCF vs QMCI Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, QMCI has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while QMCI trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas QMCI's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QMCI's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is less volatile compared to QMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check QMCI's competition here
HKXCF vs ITNM Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, ITNM has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while ITNM trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas ITNM's P/E ratio is -113.64. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITNM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to ITNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check ITNM's competition here
HKXCF vs GLBR Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, GLBR has a market cap of 614. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while GLBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas GLBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to GLBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check GLBR's competition here
HKXCF vs EMYIF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, EMYIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while EMYIF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas EMYIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMYIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to EMYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check EMYIF's competition here
HKXCF vs UBAZF Comparison August 2025
HKXCF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKXCF stands at 69.9B. In comparison, UBAZF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HKXCF is priced at $55.33, while UBAZF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKXCF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.96, whereas UBAZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKXCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UBAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKXCF is more volatile compared to UBAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKXCF.Check UBAZF's competition here