Hiru Corporation
Hiru Corporation HIRU Peers
See (HIRU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIRU | $0.00 | -5.00% | 7.8M | 0.50 | $0.00 | N/A |
| NNFSF | $5.03 | +0.00% | 54.4B | 32.27 | $0.15 | +4.33% |
| CCHGY | $53.87 | +0.29% | 19.6B | 20.47 | $2.64 | +2.08% |
| EMBVF | $10.63 | +2.06% | 18B | 15.18 | $0.70 | +2.92% |
| CCHBF | $52.65 | -1.20% | 13.3B | 13.77 | $2.65 | +6.19% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.03% |
| YKLTF | $17.79 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 18.04 | $1.05 | +1.19% |
| YKLTY | $9.19 | +4.20% | 5.3B | 16.73 | $0.51 | +1.52% |
| COCSF | $9.18 | -2.24% | 4.6B | 15.04 | $0.61 | +3.60% |
| BTVCF | $16.40 | +15.09% | 4.1B | 26.89 | $0.61 | +2.26% |
Stock Comparison
HIRU vs NNFSF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while NNFSF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs CCHGY Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while CCHGY trades at $53.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs EMBVF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while EMBVF trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs CCHBF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while CCHBF trades at $52.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs BTVCY Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to BTVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs YKLTF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while YKLTF trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs YKLTY Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while YKLTY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs COCSF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while COCSF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs BTVCF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs UNPSF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to UNPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs ITONF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while ITONF trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs CCOJY Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while CCOJY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 101.43. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs CCOJF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 69.05. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to CCOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs ITOEF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to ITOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs OSOPF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to OSOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs FQVTF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while FQVTF trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs LSDAF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while LSDAF trades at $157.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs YNAJF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 807.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while YNAJF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs BAGFF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 778.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to BAGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs NJMVF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 698M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to NJMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs HAATF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while HAATF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs UPCHY Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while UPCHY trades at $116.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs CHFHY Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs PDPG Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while PDPG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is less volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs JSDA Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while JSDA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs MOJO Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while MOJO trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs KRTL Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while KRTL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs RVBR Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while RVBR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs FLWBF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while FLWBF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs APRU Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is less volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs DRNK Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is less volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs PLVFF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to PLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs RMHB Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while RMHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs PURT Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs AQPW Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while AQPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs INKW Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs ALKM Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to ALKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs NBVG Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 768.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs FBEC Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 585.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to FBEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs HSEEF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 414.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while HSEEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs MCHA Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 409.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while MCHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to MCHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs TBEV Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 397.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs VGID Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs NTEI Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 272K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while NTEI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to NTEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs ASII Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 265.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is less volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs FMBV Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 226.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FMBV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs STZU Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 206.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs FHBC Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs HFBG Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 197K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs DNAX Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs GHMP Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to GHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs DNDT Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 142K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while DNDT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs MLHC Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs EQLB Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 71.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs KRED Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 22.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs FGFT Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to FGFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs BGEM Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs BVNNF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to BVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs PPBV Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs HKBV Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs KGKG Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is less volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs SWRI Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to SWRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs AQUI Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 594. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while AQUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs BBDA Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs ABVG Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to ABVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs CLCL Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs RMIL Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, RMIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while RMIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.
HIRU vs GGGRF Comparison
HIRU plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIRU stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HIRU is priced at $0.00, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIRU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.50, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HIRU's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIRU is more volatile compared to GGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIRU.