Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited
Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited (HHUSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HHUSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HHUSF | $5.00 | +16.28% | 9.8B | 166.67 | $0.03 | N/A |
| ASMLF | $691.58 | -0.22% | 270.7B | 24.77 | $27.79 | +1.04% |
| SLEGF | $188.10 | +0.00% | 72.3B | 376.19 | $0.50 | N/A |
| TOELY | $73.56 | -5.99% | 67.3B | 18.47 | $3.97 | +1.64% |
| IFNNY | $39.07 | -0.64% | 50.8B | 35.55 | $1.10 | +0.98% |
| IFNNF | $38.95 | -2.67% | 50.6B | 35.41 | $1.10 | +0.94% |
| ADTTF | $67.92 | -9.80% | 49.7B | 46.20 | $1.47 | +0.39% |
| ATEYY | $66.83 | +0.15% | 48.7B | 45.27 | $1.47 | +0.27% |
| RNECY | $6.00 | -0.99% | 43.1B | -33.28 | -$0.18 | +0.93% |
| DISPF | $303.60 | +0.00% | 32.9B | 39.53 | $7.68 | +0.92% |
Stock Comparison
HHUSF vs ASMLF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ASMLF has a market cap of 270.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ASMLF trades at $691.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ASMLF's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASMLF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to ASMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check ASMLF's competition here
HHUSF vs SLEGF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SLEGF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SLEGF trades at $188.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SLEGF's P/E ratio is 376.19. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and SLEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLEGF's competition here
HHUSF vs TOELY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, TOELY has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while TOELY trades at $73.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas TOELY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOELY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to TOELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check TOELY's competition here
HHUSF vs IFNNY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, IFNNY has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while IFNNY trades at $39.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas IFNNY's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFNNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to IFNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check IFNNY's competition here
HHUSF vs IFNNF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, IFNNF has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while IFNNF trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas IFNNF's P/E ratio is 35.41. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to IFNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check IFNNF's competition here
HHUSF vs ADTTF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ADTTF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ADTTF trades at $67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ADTTF's P/E ratio is 46.20. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADTTF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and ADTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTTF's competition here
HHUSF vs ATEYY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ATEYY has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ATEYY trades at $66.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ATEYY's P/E ratio is 45.27. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATEYY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to ATEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check ATEYY's competition here
HHUSF vs RNECY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, RNECY has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while RNECY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas RNECY's P/E ratio is -33.28. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNECY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to RNECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check RNECY's competition here
HHUSF vs DISPF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, DISPF has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while DISPF trades at $303.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas DISPF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DISPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and DISPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DISPF's competition here
HHUSF vs DSCSY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, DSCSY has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while DSCSY trades at $28.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas DSCSY's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DSCSY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to DSCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check DSCSY's competition here
HHUSF vs ASMIY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ASMIY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ASMIY trades at $481.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ASMIY's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASMIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to ASMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check ASMIY's competition here
HHUSF vs ASMXF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ASMXF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ASMXF trades at $478.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ASMXF's P/E ratio is 38.55. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASMXF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and ASMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASMXF's competition here
HHUSF vs STMEF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, STMEF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while STMEF trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas STMEF's P/E ratio is 38.12. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STMEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to STMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check STMEF's competition here
HHUSF vs RNECF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, RNECF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while RNECF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas RNECF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNECF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and RNECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNECF's competition here
HHUSF vs BESVF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BESVF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while BESVF trades at $142.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas BESVF's P/E ratio is 58.24. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BESVF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and BESVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BESVF's competition here
HHUSF vs BESIY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BESIY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while BESIY trades at $134.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas BESIY's P/E ratio is 54.79. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BESIY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to BESIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check BESIY's competition here
HHUSF vs LSRCF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, LSRCF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while LSRCF trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas LSRCF's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSRCF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to LSRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check LSRCF's competition here
HHUSF vs LSRCY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, LSRCY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while LSRCY trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas LSRCY's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSRCY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to LSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check LSRCY's competition here
HHUSF vs DINRF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, DINRF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while DINRF trades at $78.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas DINRF's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DINRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and DINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DINRF's competition here
HHUSF vs ROHCY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ROHCY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ROHCY trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ROHCY's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROHCY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and ROHCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROHCY's competition here
HHUSF vs ROHCF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ROHCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ROHCF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ROHCF's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROHCF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to ROHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check ROHCF's competition here
HHUSF vs ASMVF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ASMVF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ASMVF trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ASMVF's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASMVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to ASMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check ASMVF's competition here
HHUSF vs SUMCF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SUMCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SUMCF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SUMCF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SUMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SUMCF's competition here
HHUSF vs SUOPY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SUOPY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SUOPY trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SUOPY's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUOPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SUOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SUOPY's competition here
HHUSF vs NRSDY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NRSDY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while NRSDY trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas NRSDY's P/E ratio is -225.00. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NRSDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and NRSDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRSDY's competition here
HHUSF vs NDCVF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NDCVF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while NDCVF trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas NDCVF's P/E ratio is -224.33. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NDCVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to NDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check NDCVF's competition here
HHUSF vs MLXSF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, MLXSF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while MLXSF trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas MLXSF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLXSF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to MLXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check MLXSF's competition here
HHUSF vs AMSSY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AMSSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while AMSSY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas AMSSY's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMSSY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and AMSSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMSSY's competition here
HHUSF vs AIIXY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AIIXY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while AIIXY trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas AIIXY's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIIXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and AIIXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIIXY's competition here
HHUSF vs AIXXF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AIXXF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while AIXXF trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas AIXXF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIXXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and AIXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIXXF's competition here
HHUSF vs SLOIF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SLOIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SLOIF trades at $48.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SLOIF's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLOIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SLOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SLOIF's competition here
HHUSF vs AWEVF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AWEVF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while AWEVF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas AWEVF's P/E ratio is -36.60. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AWEVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to AWEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check AWEVF's competition here
HHUSF vs SLOIY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SLOIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SLOIY trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SLOIY's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLOIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and SLOIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLOIY's competition here
HHUSF vs SSLLF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SSLLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SSLLF trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SSLLF's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SSLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SSLLF's competition here
HHUSF vs AUKUF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AUKUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while AUKUF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas AUKUF's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AUKUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to AUKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check AUKUF's competition here
HHUSF vs OXINF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, OXINF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while OXINF trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas OXINF's P/E ratio is 39.07. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OXINF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and OXINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OXINF's competition here
HHUSF vs SFDMY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SFDMY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SFDMY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SFDMY's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFDMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SFDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SFDMY's competition here
HHUSF vs ASMVY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ASMVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ASMVY trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ASMVY's P/E ratio is 107.80. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASMVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to ASMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check ASMVY's competition here
HHUSF vs XFABF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, XFABF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while XFABF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas XFABF's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XFABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and XFABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XFABF's competition here
HHUSF vs FUJXF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, FUJXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while FUJXF trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas FUJXF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUJXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to FUJXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check FUJXF's competition here
HHUSF vs SANJF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SANJF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SANJF trades at $41.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SANJF's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANJF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SANJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SANJF's competition here
HHUSF vs SESMF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SESMF has a market cap of 692M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SESMF trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SESMF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SESMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and SESMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SESMF's competition here
HHUSF vs PVLYL Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, PVLYL has a market cap of 691.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while PVLYL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas PVLYL's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PVLYL's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and PVLYL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PVLYL's competition here
HHUSF vs SILXF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SILXF has a market cap of 654.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SILXF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SILXF's P/E ratio is -34.37. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SILXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SILXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SILXF's competition here
HHUSF vs SILXY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SILXY has a market cap of 629.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SILXY trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SILXY's P/E ratio is -31.45. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SILXY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SILXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SILXY's competition here
HHUSF vs MITNF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, MITNF has a market cap of 507.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while MITNF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas MITNF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MITNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and MITNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MITNF's competition here
HHUSF vs THPTF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, THPTF has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while THPTF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas THPTF's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THPTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and THPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THPTF's competition here
HHUSF vs BRCHF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BRCHF has a market cap of 278.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while BRCHF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas BRCHF's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRCHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to BRCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check BRCHF's competition here
HHUSF vs WBTNF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, WBTNF has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while WBTNF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas WBTNF's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WBTNF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to WBTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check WBTNF's competition here
HHUSF vs MCRNF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, MCRNF has a market cap of 209.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while MCRNF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas MCRNF's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCRNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to MCRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check MCRNF's competition here
HHUSF vs NLST Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NLST has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while NLST trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas NLST's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NLST's ROE of +6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to NLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check NLST's competition here
HHUSF vs QNCCF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, QNCCF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while QNCCF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas QNCCF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QNCCF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to QNCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check QNCCF's competition here
HHUSF vs IQEPF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, IQEPF has a market cap of 145.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while IQEPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas IQEPF's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IQEPF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to IQEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check IQEPF's competition here
HHUSF vs IQEPY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, IQEPY has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while IQEPY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas IQEPY's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IQEPY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to IQEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check IQEPY's competition here
HHUSF vs FRDSF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, FRDSF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while FRDSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas FRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FRDSF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and FRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRDSF's competition here
HHUSF vs RNWEY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, RNWEY has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while RNWEY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas RNWEY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNWEY's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to RNWEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check RNWEY's competition here
HHUSF vs RNWEF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, RNWEF has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while RNWEF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas RNWEF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNWEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to RNWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check RNWEF's competition here
HHUSF vs BUGLF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BUGLF has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while BUGLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas BUGLF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BUGLF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and BUGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BUGLF's competition here
HHUSF vs PAGDF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, PAGDF has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while PAGDF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas PAGDF's P/E ratio is -56.40. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and PAGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAGDF's competition here
HHUSF vs CYBL Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CYBL has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while CYBL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas CYBL's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CYBL's ROE of -23.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to CYBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check CYBL's competition here
HHUSF vs ARRXF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ARRXF has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ARRXF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ARRXF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARRXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to ARRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check ARRXF's competition here
HHUSF vs OBDCF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, OBDCF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while OBDCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas OBDCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OBDCF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and OBDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OBDCF's competition here
HHUSF vs NNOCF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NNOCF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while NNOCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas NNOCF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NNOCF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to NNOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check NNOCF's competition here
HHUSF vs SODI Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SODI has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SODI trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SODI's P/E ratio is -329.00. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SODI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and SODI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SODI's competition here
HHUSF vs PRKR Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, PRKR has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while PRKR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas PRKR's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRKR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to PRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check PRKR's competition here
HHUSF vs MMTIF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, MMTIF has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while MMTIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas MMTIF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMTIF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to MMTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check MMTIF's competition here
HHUSF vs MYBUF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, MYBUF has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while MYBUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas MYBUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MYBUF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to MYBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check MYBUF's competition here
HHUSF vs NXTBF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NXTBF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while NXTBF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas NXTBF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXTBF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and NXTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXTBF's competition here
HHUSF vs SCIA Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SCIA has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SCIA trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SCIA's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCIA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SCIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SCIA's competition here
HHUSF vs WSKEF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, WSKEF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while WSKEF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas WSKEF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WSKEF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to WSKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check WSKEF's competition here
HHUSF vs GUER Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, GUER has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while GUER trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas GUER's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GUER's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to GUER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check GUER's competition here
HHUSF vs RBCN Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, RBCN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while RBCN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas RBCN's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RBCN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to RBCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check RBCN's competition here
HHUSF vs BCHPY Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BCHPY has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while BCHPY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas BCHPY's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCHPY's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to BCHPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check BCHPY's competition here
HHUSF vs PSFT Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, PSFT has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while PSFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas PSFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and PSFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSFT's competition here
HHUSF vs MANZF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, MANZF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while MANZF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas MANZF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and MANZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MANZF's competition here
HHUSF vs NMGC Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NMGC has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while NMGC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas NMGC's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMGC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to NMGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check NMGC's competition here
HHUSF vs SPVNF Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SPVNF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SPVNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SPVNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPVNF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to SPVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check SPVNF's competition here
HHUSF vs STRI Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, STRI has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while STRI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas STRI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STRI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and STRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STRI's competition here
HHUSF vs ITCJ Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ITCJ has a market cap of 335K. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ITCJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ITCJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITCJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to ITCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check ITCJ's competition here
HHUSF vs ODII Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ODII has a market cap of 292K. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while ODII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas ODII's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ODII's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and ODII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODII's competition here
HHUSF vs CXCQ Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CXCQ has a market cap of 255K. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while CXCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas CXCQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CXCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to CXCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check CXCQ's competition here
HHUSF vs GSTX Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, GSTX has a market cap of 211.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while GSTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas GSTX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GSTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and GSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSTX's competition here
HHUSF vs TXCCQ Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, TXCCQ has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while TXCCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas TXCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TXCCQ's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and TXCCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TXCCQ's competition here
HHUSF vs MTNX Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, MTNX has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while MTNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas MTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTNX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and MTNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTNX's competition here
HHUSF vs STRB Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, STRB has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while STRB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas STRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STRB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to STRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check STRB's competition here
HHUSF vs SRII Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SRII has a market cap of 350. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while SRII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas SRII's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF and SRII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRII's competition here
HHUSF vs HSCO Comparison August 2025
HHUSF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHUSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, HSCO has a market cap of 200. Regarding current trading prices, HHUSF is priced at $5.00, while HSCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHUSF currently has a P/E ratio of 166.67, whereas HSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHUSF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HSCO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HHUSF is less volatile compared to HSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHUSF.Check HSCO's competition here