HydroGraph Clean Power Inc.
HydroGraph Clean Power Inc. HGCPF Peers
See (HGCPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGCPF | $0.09 | -1.53% | 20.8M | -3.00 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| AIQUY | $41.77 | -0.38% | 120.4B | 32.13 | $1.30 | +1.53% |
| AIQUF | $208.79 | -0.60% | 120.4B | 32.17 | $6.49 | +1.56% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | N/A | 48.4B | -509.09 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| GVDNY | $101.47 | -0.89% | 46.8B | 35.48 | $2.86 | +1.53% |
| GVDBF | $4,967.03 | +3.81% | 45.8B | 34.78 | $142.82 | +1.59% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | N/A | 45.6B | -52.67 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SXYAY | $26.66 | +0.68% | 42.8B | 28.06 | $0.95 | +1.42% |
| SKFOF | $266.25 | +0.15% | 42.7B | 28.54 | $9.33 | +0.77% |
| NVZMY | $72.96 | +1.79% | 34.3B | 64.56 | $1.13 | +1.42% |
Stock Comparison
HGCPF vs AIQUY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while AIQUY trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs AIQUF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while AIQUF trades at $208.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs PTCAY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -509.09. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs GVDNY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while GVDNY trades at $101.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs GVDBF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while GVDBF trades at $4,967.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs PTPIF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SXYAY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SXYAY trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SKFOF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SKFOF trades at $266.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs NVZMY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while NVZMY trades at $72.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 64.56. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs NVZMF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while NVZMF trades at $73.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 64.65. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs AKZOY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while AKZOY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs EMSHF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while EMSHF trades at $796.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs NPCPF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while NPCPF trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SYIEF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SYIEF trades at $123.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SYIEY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SYIEY trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs COVTY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while COVTY trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -28.92. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs NDEKF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while NDEKF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs AKZOF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while AKZOF trades at $69.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs CVVTF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while CVVTF trades at $62.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -26.39. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs CRTSF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs CHYHY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs EVKIY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while EVKIY trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs BNTGY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while BNTGY trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs EVKIF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while EVKIF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs BNTGF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while BNTGF trades at $66.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SCVUF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SCVPY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SCVPY trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 51.08. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs IMDZF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while IMDZF trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs FUPBY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while FUPBY trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs TKKYY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while TKKYY trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ASGLF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ASGLF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -14.84. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ASGLY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ASGLY trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs FUPPF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs TKCBY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs OCLDY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while OCLDY trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 103.08. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs COIHF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while COIHF trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs COIHY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while COIHY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ARKAF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ARKAF trades at $69.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ARKAY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ARKAY trades at $68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs NDEKY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while NDEKY trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs OCLDF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while OCLDF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs MITUF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while MITUF trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs KDSKF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs MITUY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while MITUY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs CLZNY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while CLZNY trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs AZLGF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while AZLGF trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs JMPLF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while JMPLF trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs FUPEF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while FUPEF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs JMPLY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while JMPLY trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs CLZNF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs WKCMF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while WKCMF trades at $71.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs NOFCF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs HXXPY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs HXPLF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while HXPLF trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ICPVF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SASOF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SASOF trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs MBGCF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while MBGCF trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs KPTCY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while KPTCY trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs INCZY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs KSANF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs LNXSY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while LNXSY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs LNXSF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while LNXSF trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs AWTRF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while AWTRF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs KPLIF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while KPLIF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs DACHF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while DACHF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs IRLCF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ZEOOY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ZEOOF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs OCINF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while OCINF trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.19. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs BRRDF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs KANKF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ALZCF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ALZCF trades at $141.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs TKYMY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while TKYMY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ELKEF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ELKEF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs TKCBF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ALPKF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ALPKF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs CSNVY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while CSNVY trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs HUABF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs CSNVF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while CSNVF trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs CUYRF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs EMNSF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while EMNSF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs TKYMF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs LNTEF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs ELMTY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while ELMTY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SKKAF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 984.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SKKAF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs HUIHY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs VTXPF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 920.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while VTXPF trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs AECLY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs HASGF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs DALQF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SYCHF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs VBVBF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 720M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while VBVBF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs DLNDY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 709.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while DLNDY trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs SYHMY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SYHMY has a market cap of 616.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while SYHMY trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SYHMY's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SYHMY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to SYHMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs TYOBY Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs FPLSF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 574.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while FPLSF trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs TNMAF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs FLRAF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 392M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while FLRAF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.
HGCPF vs NOPMF Comparison
HGCPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGCPF stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, HGCPF is priced at $0.09, while NOPMF trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGCPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, HGCPF's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGCPF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGCPF.