Horizons Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF
Horizons Active Ultra-Short Term Investment Grade Bond ETF HFR.TO Peers
See (HFR.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFR.TO | $10.08 | -0.10% | 443.68M | N/A | N/A | +4.11% |
| ZAG.TO | $13.79 | +0.18% | 10.86B | N/A | N/A | +3.48% |
| VAB.TO | $22.96 | +0.22% | 5.52B | N/A | N/A | +3.28% |
| ZST.TO | $49.06 | +0.04% | 4.59B | N/A | N/A | +4.04% |
| ZFL.TO | $12.47 | +0.56% | 3.53B | N/A | N/A | +3.20% |
| HBB.TO | $48.99 | +0.06% | 3.40B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZIC.TO | $17.78 | -0.95% | 3.20B | N/A | N/A | +4.00% |
| ZMU.TO | $12.55 | +0.20% | 3.15B | N/A | N/A | +4.04% |
| NSCB.TO | $22.46 | +0.20% | 2.87B | N/A | N/A | +2.80% |
| FLCP.TO | $17.80 | +0.06% | 2.84B | 15.43 | $1.15 | +3.52% |
Stock Comparison
HFR.TO vs ZAG.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZAG.TO has a market cap of 10.86B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZAG.TO trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZAG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs VAB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, VAB.TO has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while VAB.TO trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to VAB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZST.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZST.TO has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZST.TO trades at $49.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZST.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZST.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ZST.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZFL.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZFL.TO has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZFL.TO trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZFL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZFL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZFL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs HBB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, HBB.TO has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while HBB.TO trades at $48.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to HBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZIC.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZIC.TO has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZIC.TO trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZMU.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZMU.TO has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZMU.TO trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZMU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs NSCB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, NSCB.TO has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while NSCB.TO trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to NSCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs FLCP.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, FLCP.TO has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while FLCP.TO trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLCP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLCP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to FLCP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZCPB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZCPB.TO has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZCPB.TO trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCPB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCPB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ZCPB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs XSB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, XSB.TO has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while XSB.TO trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSB.TO's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to XSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs TDB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, TDB.TO has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while TDB.TO trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to TDB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs PCOR.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, PCOR.TO has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while PCOR.TO trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to PCOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZCM.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZCM.TO has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZCM.TO trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs NHYB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, NHYB.TO has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while NHYB.TO trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHYB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHYB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to NHYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs CAGG.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, CAGG.TO has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while CAGG.TO trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to CAGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZJK.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZJK.TO has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZJK.TO trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZJK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZJK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZJK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs FCGB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, FCGB.TO has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while FCGB.TO trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to FCGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs VSC.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, VSC.TO has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while VSC.TO trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to VSC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs QBB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, QBB.TO has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while QBB.TO trades at $93.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to QBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZHY.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZHY.TO has a market cap of 961.22M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZHY.TO trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZHY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RQO.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RQO.TO has a market cap of 913.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RQO.TO trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to RQO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZDB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZDB.TO has a market cap of 796.86M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZDB.TO trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZDB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RQP.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RQP.TO has a market cap of 732.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RQP.TO trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to RQP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs CBO.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, CBO.TO has a market cap of 723.02M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while CBO.TO trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to CBO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs CLG.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, CLG.TO has a market cap of 700.07M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while CLG.TO trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to CLG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs FGO.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, FGO.TO has a market cap of 617.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while FGO.TO trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO and FGO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.10).
HFR.TO vs IGB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, IGB.TO has a market cap of 612.54M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while IGB.TO trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to IGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RQN.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RQN.TO has a market cap of 573.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RQN.TO trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO and RQN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.10).
HFR.TO vs QUIG.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, QUIG.TO has a market cap of 513.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while QUIG.TO trades at $84.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to QUIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZLC.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZLC.TO has a market cap of 486.62M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZLC.TO trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZLC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs XQB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, XQB.TO has a market cap of 469.52M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while XQB.TO trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XQB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to XQB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZFS.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZFS.TO has a market cap of 456.90M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZFS.TO trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZFS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZFS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZFS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs HTB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, HTB.TO has a market cap of 435.96M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while HTB.TO trades at $57.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to HTB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs TCLB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, TCLB.TO has a market cap of 423.47M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while TCLB.TO trades at $115.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to TCLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs VCB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, VCB.TO has a market cap of 407.69M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while VCB.TO trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to VCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZMP.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZMP.TO has a market cap of 396.00M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZMP.TO trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZMP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZPS.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZPS.TO has a market cap of 353.38M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZPS.TO trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ZPS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZPL.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZPL.TO has a market cap of 305.84M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZPL.TO trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZPL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs TUHY.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, TUHY.TO has a market cap of 290.48M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while TUHY.TO trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to TUHY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs QEBH.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, QEBH.TO has a market cap of 260.90M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while QEBH.TO trades at $77.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QEBH.TO's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QEBH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to QEBH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs XRB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, XRB.TO has a market cap of 254.22M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while XRB.TO trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to XRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs XIG.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, XIG.TO has a market cap of 240.54M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while XIG.TO trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to XIG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs TCSB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, TCSB.TO has a market cap of 238.96M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while TCSB.TO trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to TCSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs XHB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, XHB.TO has a market cap of 214.48M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while XHB.TO trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to XHB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs FSB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, FSB.TO has a market cap of 205.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while FSB.TO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to FSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs XSAB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, XSAB.TO has a market cap of 186.69M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while XSAB.TO trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSAB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to XSAB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZCB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZCB.TO has a market cap of 155.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZCB.TO trades at $47.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RBO.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RBO.TO has a market cap of 137.19M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RBO.TO trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to RBO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZSB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZSB.TO has a market cap of 133.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZSB.TO trades at $48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ZSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs PTB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, PTB.TO has a market cap of 121.76M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while PTB.TO trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to PTB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs XSTB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, XSTB.TO has a market cap of 119.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while XSTB.TO trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to XSTB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RLB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RLB.TO has a market cap of 118.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RLB.TO trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to RLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs VGV.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, VGV.TO has a market cap of 112.36M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while VGV.TO trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to VGV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs DCG.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, DCG.TO has a market cap of 110.55M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while DCG.TO trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to DCG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs HBND.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, HBND.TO has a market cap of 105.25M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while HBND.TO trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to HBND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs FLCI.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, FLCI.TO has a market cap of 98.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while FLCI.TO trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLCI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLCI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to FLCI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ONEB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ONEB.TO has a market cap of 94.02M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ONEB.TO trades at $49.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ONEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs TULB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, TULB.TO has a market cap of 79.50M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while TULB.TO trades at $105.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TULB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TULB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to TULB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZRR.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZRR.TO has a market cap of 77.63M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZRR.TO trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZRR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ZRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs DXO.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, DXO.TO has a market cap of 76.08M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while DXO.TO trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to DXO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ESGB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ESGB.TO has a market cap of 74.10M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ESGB.TO trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to ESGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ICPB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ICPB.TO has a market cap of 62.95M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ICPB.TO trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICPB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICPB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ICPB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs QHY.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, QHY.TO has a market cap of 59.56M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while QHY.TO trades at $81.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to QHY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZMSB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZMSB.TO has a market cap of 56.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZMSB.TO trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ZMSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs CXF.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, CXF.TO has a market cap of 50.31M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while CXF.TO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to CXF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs DRCU.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, DRCU.TO has a market cap of 45.50M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while DRCU.TO trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRCU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to DRCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs HAD.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, HAD.TO has a market cap of 44.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while HAD.TO trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to HAD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs BXF.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, BXF.TO has a market cap of 43.62M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while BXF.TO trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to BXF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs QSB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, QSB.TO has a market cap of 40.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while QSB.TO trades at $99.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to QSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs CMAR.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, CMAR.TO has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while CMAR.TO trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMAR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to CMAR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs QEBL.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, QEBL.TO has a market cap of 34.66M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while QEBL.TO trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QEBL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QEBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to QEBL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ZQB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ZQB.TO has a market cap of 33.93M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ZQB.TO trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZQB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ZQB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs XEB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, XEB.TO has a market cap of 33.62M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while XEB.TO trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to XEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RQG.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RQG.TO has a market cap of 25.86M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RQG.TO trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to RQG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs ESGF.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, ESGF.TO has a market cap of 24.33M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while ESGF.TO trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to ESGF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs DCS.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, DCS.TO has a market cap of 19.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while DCS.TO trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to DCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RQI.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RQI.TO has a market cap of 18.40M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RQI.TO trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to RQI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RQH.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RQH.TO has a market cap of 17.70M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RQH.TO trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to RQH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs FGB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, FGB.TO has a market cap of 17.70M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while FGB.TO trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to FGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs TUSB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, TUSB.TO has a market cap of 14.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while TUSB.TO trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to TUSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs RPSB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, RPSB.TO has a market cap of 11.03M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while RPSB.TO trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to RPSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs HTH.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, HTH.TO has a market cap of 9.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while HTH.TO trades at $54.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to HTH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs DCC.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, DCC.TO has a market cap of 7.15M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while DCC.TO trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to DCC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs HUIB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, HUIB.TO has a market cap of 5.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while HUIB.TO trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUIB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUIB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to HUIB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs SFIX.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, SFIX.TO has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while SFIX.TO trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFIX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is less volatile compared to SFIX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs FLB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, FLB.TO has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while FLB.TO trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to FLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs HMA.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, HMA.TO has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while HMA.TO trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to HMA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs USB.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, USB.TO has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while USB.TO trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to USB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.
HFR.TO vs CORP.TO Comparison
HFR.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFR.TO stands at 443.68M. In comparison, CORP.TO has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, HFR.TO is priced at $10.08, while CORP.TO trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFR.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFR.TO is more volatile compared to CORP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFR.TO.