Navigator Global Investments Limited

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, VSTKF has a market cap of 217.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while VSTKF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas VSTKF's P/E ratio is -166.00. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VSTKF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is less volatile compared to VSTKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check VSTKF's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, MMAVX has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while MMAVX trades at $13.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas MMAVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMAVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is more volatile compared to MMAVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check MMAVX's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, ESIFF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while ESIFF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas ESIFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESIFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is less volatile compared to ESIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check ESIFF's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, SOLCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while SOLCF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas SOLCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOLCF's ROE of +8.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is less volatile compared to SOLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check SOLCF's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, EATBF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while EATBF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas EATBF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EATBF's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is less volatile compared to EATBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check EATBF's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, RSCZF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while RSCZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas RSCZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RSCZF's ROE of -6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is less volatile compared to RSCZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check RSCZF's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, GVHIB has a market cap of 7.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while GVHIB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas GVHIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GVHIB's ROE of -19.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is less volatile compared to GVHIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check GVHIB's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, GOOI has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while GOOI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas GOOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOOI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is more volatile compared to GOOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check GOOI's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, 0P0000V0SF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while 0P0000V0SF trades at $118.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas 0P0000V0SF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0P0000V0SF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is more volatile compared to 0P0000V0SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check 0P0000V0SF's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, CMBXF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while CMBXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas CMBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMBXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is more volatile compared to CMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check CMBXF's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, 0P0000ZLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while 0P0000ZLBW trades at $276.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas 0P0000ZLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0P0000ZLBW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is more volatile compared to 0P0000ZLBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check 0P0000ZLBW's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, FRCGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while FRCGF trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas FRCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRCGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is more volatile compared to FRCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check FRCGF's competition here

HFAHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HFAHF stands at 534.2M. In comparison, 0P0000YVM9 has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFAHF is priced at $1.09, while 0P0000YVM9 trades at $32.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HFAHF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas 0P0000YVM9's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFAHF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0P0000YVM9's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFAHF is more volatile compared to 0P0000YVM9. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFAHF.Check 0P0000YVM9's competition here