Heijmans N.V.
Heijmans N.V. (HEIJM.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HEIJM.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEIJM.AS | €77.70 | -3.48% | 2.1B | 16.43 | €4.73 | +2.11% |
| DG.PA | €131.60 | -0.75% | 73.2B | 15.20 | €8.66 | +3.61% |
| EN.PA | €50.34 | -1.33% | 19.3B | 16.84 | €2.99 | +3.97% |
| FGR.PA | €135.70 | -0.33% | 13.1B | 12.68 | €10.70 | +3.46% |
| ACKB.BR | €272.20 | +0.37% | 8.9B | 15.05 | €18.09 | +1.40% |
| SPIE.PA | €44.02 | +0.18% | 7.5B | 42.33 | €1.04 | +2.39% |
| DEME.BR | €190.00 | -0.52% | 4.8B | 13.85 | €13.72 | +1.40% |
| ARCAD.AS | €28.56 | +0.07% | 2.4B | 12.26 | €2.33 | +3.50% |
| BAMNB.AS | €9.03 | -3.01% | 2.3B | 11.28 | €0.80 | +2.77% |
| EGL.LS | €4.73 | +0.17% | 1.4B | 10.74 | €0.44 | +3.17% |
Stock Comparison
HEIJM.AS vs DG.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DG.PA has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while DG.PA trades at €131.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas DG.PA's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DG.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to DG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check DG.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs EN.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EN.PA has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while EN.PA trades at €50.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas EN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EN.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to EN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check EN.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs FGR.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FGR.PA has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while FGR.PA trades at €135.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas FGR.PA's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FGR.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to FGR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check FGR.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs ACKB.BR Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ACKB.BR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while ACKB.BR trades at €272.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas ACKB.BR's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACKB.BR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to ACKB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check ACKB.BR's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs SPIE.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SPIE.PA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while SPIE.PA trades at €44.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas SPIE.PA's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPIE.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to SPIE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check SPIE.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs DEME.BR Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DEME.BR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while DEME.BR trades at €190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas DEME.BR's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DEME.BR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to DEME.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check DEME.BR's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs ARCAD.AS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ARCAD.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while ARCAD.AS trades at €28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas ARCAD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARCAD.AS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to ARCAD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check ARCAD.AS's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs BAMNB.AS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BAMNB.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while BAMNB.AS trades at €9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas BAMNB.AS's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BAMNB.AS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to BAMNB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check BAMNB.AS's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs EGL.LS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EGL.LS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while EGL.LS trades at €4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas EGL.LS's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EGL.LS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is less volatile compared to EGL.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check EGL.LS's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs ASY.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ASY.PA has a market cap of 609.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while ASY.PA trades at €41.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas ASY.PA's P/E ratio is 82.20. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASY.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to ASY.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check ASY.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs MOUR.BR Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MOUR.BR has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while MOUR.BR trades at €720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas MOUR.BR's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOUR.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to MOUR.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check MOUR.BR's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs CFEB.BR Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFEB.BR has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while CFEB.BR trades at €10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas CFEB.BR's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CFEB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is less volatile compared to CFEB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check CFEB.BR's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs MAR.LS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MAR.LS has a market cap of 235.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while MAR.LS trades at €2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas MAR.LS's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MAR.LS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to MAR.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check MAR.LS's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs TDSA.LS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TDSA.LS has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while TDSA.LS trades at €0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas TDSA.LS's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TDSA.LS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is less volatile compared to TDSA.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check TDSA.LS's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs TVRB.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TVRB.PA has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while TVRB.PA trades at €64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas TVRB.PA's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TVRB.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to TVRB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check TVRB.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs INFE.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INFE.PA has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while INFE.PA trades at €71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas INFE.PA's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INFE.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to INFE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check INFE.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs MDF.MC Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MDF.MC has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while MDF.MC trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas MDF.MC's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MDF.MC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is less volatile compared to MDF.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check MDF.MC's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs CDU.LS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CDU.LS has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while CDU.LS trades at €15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas CDU.LS's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDU.LS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to CDU.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check CDU.LS's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs MLHYE.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MLHYE.PA has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while MLHYE.PA trades at €125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas MLHYE.PA's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLHYE.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to MLHYE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check MLHYE.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs SEC.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SEC.PA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while SEC.PA trades at €6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas SEC.PA's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEC.PA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to SEC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check SEC.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs GPA.LS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GPA.LS has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while GPA.LS trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas GPA.LS's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GPA.LS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to GPA.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check GPA.LS's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs MLAGI.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MLAGI.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while MLAGI.PA trades at €0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas MLAGI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLAGI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to MLAGI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check MLAGI.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs MLAMY.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MLAMY.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while MLAMY.PA trades at €3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas MLAMY.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLAMY.PA's ROE of -3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to MLAMY.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check MLAMY.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs ORANW.AS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ORANW.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while ORANW.AS trades at €5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas ORANW.AS's P/E ratio is -16.76. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ORANW.AS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to ORANW.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check ORANW.AS's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs COLP.PA Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, COLP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while COLP.PA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas COLP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COLP.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HEIJM.AS has daily volatility of 4.17 and COLP.PA has daily volatility of N/A.Check COLP.PA's competition here
HEIJM.AS vs BOKA.AS Comparison April 2026
HEIJM.AS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEIJM.AS stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BOKA.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HEIJM.AS is priced at €77.70, while BOKA.AS trades at €32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEIJM.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.43, whereas BOKA.AS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, HEIJM.AS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BOKA.AS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HEIJM.AS is more volatile compared to BOKA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEIJM.AS.Check BOKA.AS's competition here