Highland Copper Company Inc.
Highland Copper Company Inc. (HDRSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HDRSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDRSF | $0.08 | -8.48% | 59.2M | -2.68 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ANFGF | $25.56 | +0.29% | 25.2B | 30.42 | $0.84 | +2.15% |
| FQVLF | $16.10 | -4.17% | 13.3B | 64.34 | $0.25 | N/A |
| JIAXF | $1.96 | -8.41% | 9B | 6.76 | $0.29 | +4.92% |
| LUNMF | $10.10 | -1.02% | 8.6B | 83.83 | $0.12 | +2.38% |
| KGHPF | $36.00 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 9.63 | $3.74 | N/A |
| OZMLF | $19.00 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 46.34 | $0.41 | N/A |
| MMLTF | $0.44 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 21.99 | $0.02 | N/A |
| CSCCF | $5.91 | +4.60% | 4.5B | 53.36 | $0.11 | N/A |
| AIAGY | $50.07 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 5.42 | $9.23 | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
HDRSF vs ANFGF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while ANFGF trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to ANFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check ANFGF's competition here
HDRSF vs FQVLF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, FQVLF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while FQVLF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas FQVLF's P/E ratio is 64.34. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FQVLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to FQVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check FQVLF's competition here
HDRSF vs JIAXF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while JIAXF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to JIAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check JIAXF's competition here
HDRSF vs LUNMF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, LUNMF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while LUNMF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas LUNMF's P/E ratio is 83.83. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LUNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to LUNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check LUNMF's competition here
HDRSF vs KGHPF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while KGHPF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to KGHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check KGHPF's competition here
HDRSF vs OZMLF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to OZMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check OZMLF's competition here
HDRSF vs MMLTF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while MMLTF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is less volatile compared to MMLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check MMLTF's competition here
HDRSF vs CSCCF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CSCCF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is 53.36. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CSCCF's competition here
HDRSF vs AIAGY Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while AIAGY trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to AIAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check AIAGY's competition here
HDRSF vs AIAGF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, AIAGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while AIAGF trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas AIAGF's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to AIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check AIAGF's competition here
HDRSF vs SFRRF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, SFRRF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while SFRRF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas SFRRF's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SFRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to SFRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check SFRRF's competition here
HDRSF vs IPMLF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, IPMLF has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while IPMLF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas IPMLF's P/E ratio is -16.28. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IPMLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to IPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check IPMLF's competition here
HDRSF vs CAMLF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 357.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CAMLF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CAMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CAMLF's competition here
HDRSF vs ASCUF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, ASCUF has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while ASCUF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas ASCUF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ASCUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to ASCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check ASCUF's competition here
HDRSF vs ARREF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 251.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while ARREF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check ARREF's competition here
HDRSF vs AMRZF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to AMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check AMRZF's competition here
HDRSF vs CPPKF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CPPKF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CPPKF's competition here
HDRSF vs LSANF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 156.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while LSANF trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to LSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check LSANF's competition here
HDRSF vs HLGVF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is less volatile compared to HLGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check HLGVF's competition here
HDRSF vs CPFXF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 104.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CPFXF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CPFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CPFXF's competition here
HDRSF vs HHLKF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while HHLKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to HHLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check HHLKF's competition here
HDRSF vs EMTRF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while EMTRF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.66. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to EMTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check EMTRF's competition here
HDRSF vs ATCUF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while ATCUF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -23.15. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to ATCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check ATCUF's competition here
HDRSF vs CPORF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CPORF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CPORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CPORF's competition here
HDRSF vs CCOXF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CCOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CCOXF's competition here
HDRSF vs NEVDF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is less volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check NEVDF's competition here
HDRSF vs CPPMF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CPPMF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CPPMF's competition here
HDRSF vs DRCMF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to DRCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check DRCMF's competition here
HDRSF vs BZDLF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while BZDLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is less volatile compared to BZDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check BZDLF's competition here
HDRSF vs QCCUF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while QCCUF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to QCCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check QCCUF's competition here
HDRSF vs USCUF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while USCUF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is less volatile compared to USCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check USCUF's competition here
HDRSF vs RKCLF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to RKCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check RKCLF's competition here
HDRSF vs ACMDY Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while ACMDY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to ACMDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check ACMDY's competition here
HDRSF vs PNTZF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while PNTZF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check PNTZF's competition here
HDRSF vs AGLAF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check AGLAF's competition here
HDRSF vs BCUFF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while BCUFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to BCUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check BCUFF's competition here
HDRSF vs SLMFF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while SLMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is less volatile compared to SLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check SLMFF's competition here
HDRSF vs CPCPF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CPCPF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CPCPF's competition here
HDRSF vs WCUFF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while WCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is less volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check WCUFF's competition here
HDRSF vs ANGUF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to ANGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check ANGUF's competition here
HDRSF vs CAEN Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CAEN trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CAEN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is less volatile compared to CAEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CAEN's competition here
HDRSF vs FVVSF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to FVVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check FVVSF's competition here
HDRSF vs BRVRF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to BRVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check BRVRF's competition here
HDRSF vs INUMF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, INUMF has a market cap of 970.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while INUMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas INUMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to INUMF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to INUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check INUMF's competition here
HDRSF vs JUBAF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, JUBAF has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while JUBAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas JUBAF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to JUBAF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to JUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check JUBAF's competition here
HDRSF vs ECMXF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to ECMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check ECMXF's competition here
HDRSF vs AEOMF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, AEOMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while AEOMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas AEOMF's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AEOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to AEOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check AEOMF's competition here
HDRSF vs CROJF Comparison August 2025
HDRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HDRSF stands at 59.2M. In comparison, CROJF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HDRSF is priced at $0.08, while CROJF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HDRSF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.68, whereas CROJF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, HDRSF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CROJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HDRSF is more volatile compared to CROJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HDRSF.Check CROJF's competition here