HB Estate Developers Limited
HB Estate Developers Limited (HBESD.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HBESD.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBESD.BO | ₹76.25 | -1.10% | 1.8B | 13.62 | ₹5.60 | N/A |
| TBOTEK.NS | ₹1,338.20 | -1.49% | 142.6B | 59.13 | ₹22.63 | N/A |
| THOMASCOOK.BO | ₹109.35 | -1.44% | 50.9B | 20.18 | ₹5.42 | +0.41% |
| THOMASCOOK.NS | ₹109.32 | -1.41% | 50.9B | 20.78 | ₹5.26 | +0.41% |
| EASEMYTRIP.BO | ₹9.18 | -1.29% | 33.4B | -34.00 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| EASEMYTRIP.NS | ₹9.14 | -1.72% | 33.2B | -33.85 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| YATRA.NS | ₹143.30 | -2.67% | 22.5B | 41.78 | ₹3.43 | N/A |
| YATRA.BO | ₹143.15 | -2.72% | 22.5B | 41.73 | ₹3.43 | N/A |
| BENARAS.BO | ₹9,503.15 | +0.01% | 12.4B | 28.08 | ₹338.40 | +0.26% |
| UPHOT.BO | ₹1,503.00 | +9.82% | 8.1B | 26.59 | ₹56.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HBESD.BO vs TBOTEK.NS Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TBOTEK.NS has a market cap of 142.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while TBOTEK.NS trades at ₹1,338.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas TBOTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 59.13. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBOTEK.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to TBOTEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check TBOTEK.NS's competition here
HBESD.BO vs THOMASCOOK.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.BO has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while THOMASCOOK.BO trades at ₹109.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas THOMASCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THOMASCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check THOMASCOOK.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs THOMASCOOK.NS Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.NS has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while THOMASCOOK.NS trades at ₹109.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas THOMASCOOK.NS's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check THOMASCOOK.NS's competition here
HBESD.BO vs EASEMYTRIP.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while EASEMYTRIP.BO trades at ₹9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas EASEMYTRIP.BO's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check EASEMYTRIP.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs EASEMYTRIP.NS Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.NS has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while EASEMYTRIP.NS trades at ₹9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas EASEMYTRIP.NS's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check EASEMYTRIP.NS's competition here
HBESD.BO vs YATRA.NS Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, YATRA.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while YATRA.NS trades at ₹143.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas YATRA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YATRA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to YATRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check YATRA.NS's competition here
HBESD.BO vs YATRA.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, YATRA.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while YATRA.BO trades at ₹143.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas YATRA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YATRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to YATRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check YATRA.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs BENARAS.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BENARAS.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while BENARAS.BO trades at ₹9,503.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas BENARAS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BENARAS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to BENARAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check BENARAS.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs UPHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UPHOT.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while UPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,503.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas UPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPHOT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to UPHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check UPHOT.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs SAYAJIHOTL.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SAYAJIHOTL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while SAYAJIHOTL.BO trades at ₹284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas SAYAJIHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.86. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check SAYAJIHOTL.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs ESPIRE.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ESPIRE.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while ESPIRE.BO trades at ₹302.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas ESPIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 155.36. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESPIRE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to ESPIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check ESPIRE.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs SINCLAIR.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SINCLAIR.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while SINCLAIR.BO trades at ₹73.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas SINCLAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SINCLAIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to SINCLAIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check SINCLAIR.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs EMERALL.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EMERALL.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while EMERALL.BO trades at ₹189.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas EMERALL.BO's P/E ratio is -27.17. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMERALL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to EMERALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check EMERALL.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs GRAVISSHO.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRAVISSHO.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while GRAVISSHO.BO trades at ₹29.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas GRAVISSHO.BO's P/E ratio is -90.70. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRAVISSHO.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to GRAVISSHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check GRAVISSHO.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs PHOENIXTN.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PHOENIXTN.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while PHOENIXTN.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas PHOENIXTN.BO's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PHOENIXTN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to PHOENIXTN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check PHOENIXTN.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs SAVERA.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SAVERA.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while SAVERA.BO trades at ₹151.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas SAVERA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAVERA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to SAVERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check SAVERA.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs CHLLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHLLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while CHLLTD.BO trades at ₹30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas CHLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to CHLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check CHLLTD.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs GUJHOTE.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GUJHOTE.BO has a market cap of 716.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while GUJHOTE.BO trades at ₹189.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas GUJHOTE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GUJHOTE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to GUJHOTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check GUJHOTE.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs RAYALEMA.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RAYALEMA.BO has a market cap of 640.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while RAYALEMA.BO trades at ₹32.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas RAYALEMA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYALEMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to RAYALEMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check RAYALEMA.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs JINDHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JINDHOT.BO has a market cap of 452.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while JINDHOT.BO trades at ₹64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas JINDHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JINDHOT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to JINDHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check JINDHOT.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs PECOS.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PECOS.BO has a market cap of 423.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while PECOS.BO trades at ₹323.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas PECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PECOS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to PECOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check PECOS.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs COX&KINGS.NS Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, COX&KINGS.NS has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while COX&KINGS.NS trades at ₹1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas COX&KINGS.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COX&KINGS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to COX&KINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check COX&KINGS.NS's competition here
HBESD.BO vs PGCRL.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PGCRL.BO has a market cap of 267.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while PGCRL.BO trades at ₹100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas PGCRL.BO's P/E ratio is -111.17. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGCRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to PGCRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check PGCRL.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs ARUNAHTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ARUNAHTEL.BO has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while ARUNAHTEL.BO trades at ₹7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas ARUNAHTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check ARUNAHTEL.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs HOWARHO.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HOWARHO.BO has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while HOWARHO.BO trades at ₹26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas HOWARHO.BO's P/E ratio is 54.49. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOWARHO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to HOWARHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check HOWARHO.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs RELIABVEN.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RELIABVEN.BO has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while RELIABVEN.BO trades at ₹19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas RELIABVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -664.00. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELIABVEN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to RELIABVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check RELIABVEN.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs POLOHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, POLOHOT.BO has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while POLOHOT.BO trades at ₹9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas POLOHOT.BO's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POLOHOT.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to POLOHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check POLOHOT.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs BESTEAST.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BESTEAST.BO has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while BESTEAST.BO trades at ₹11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas BESTEAST.BO's P/E ratio is -82.71. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BESTEAST.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to BESTEAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check BESTEAST.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs HOTLSILV.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HOTLSILV.BO has a market cap of 189M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while HOTLSILV.BO trades at ₹11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas HOTLSILV.BO's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOTLSILV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to HOTLSILV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check HOTLSILV.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs VELHO.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VELHO.BO has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while VELHO.BO trades at ₹5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas VELHO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VELHO.BO's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to VELHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check VELHO.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs CINDHO.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CINDHO.BO has a market cap of 180.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while CINDHO.BO trades at ₹50.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas CINDHO.BO's P/E ratio is 72.77. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CINDHO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to CINDHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check CINDHO.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs RASRESOR.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RASRESOR.BO has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while RASRESOR.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas RASRESOR.BO's P/E ratio is 50.65. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RASRESOR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to RASRESOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check RASRESOR.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs LORDSHOTL.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LORDSHOTL.BO has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while LORDSHOTL.BO trades at ₹14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas LORDSHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LORDSHOTL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to LORDSHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check LORDSHOTL.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs SAILANI.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SAILANI.BO has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while SAILANI.BO trades at ₹18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas SAILANI.BO's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAILANI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to SAILANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check SAILANI.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs WOODSVILA.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WOODSVILA.BO has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while WOODSVILA.BO trades at ₹13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas WOODSVILA.BO's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOODSVILA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is more volatile compared to WOODSVILA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check WOODSVILA.BO's competition here
HBESD.BO vs SILVERPRL.BO Comparison February 2026
HBESD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBESD.BO stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SILVERPRL.BO has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBESD.BO is priced at ₹76.25, while SILVERPRL.BO trades at ₹7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBESD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.62, whereas SILVERPRL.BO's P/E ratio is -181.75. In terms of profitability, HBESD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILVERPRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBESD.BO is less volatile compared to SILVERPRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBESD.BO.Check SILVERPRL.BO's competition here